A novel forest state assessment methodology to support conservation and forest management planning

A new forest state assessment methodology to complement existing conservation and forestry data has been developed. The aim is to provide tools for strategic planning including spatial distribution of conservation priorities. The method is point-based using a dense systematic sampling grid and provides more detailed information than vegetation maps or forest subcompartment descriptions, but requires less effort than forest inventories. Indicators include canopy composition and structure, deadwood, herbs, microhabitats, disturbances, shrubs and regeneration. The results can inform managers about the structural and compositional diversity of forest stands in the form of thematic maps and can provide the basis for analysis of habitat suitability for forest-dwelling organisms. A smartphone application has been developed to enable electronic data collection. PostGIS and Python scripts were used in the data flow. In this paper, we outline the development of the assessment protocol, and present the sampling design and the variables recorded. The main advantages of the survey methodology are also shown by case-studies based on data collected during the first field season in 2014. The protocol has been designed for low mountain forests in Hungary, but it can be modified to fit other forest types.

[1]  Phillip B. Gibbons,et al.  Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement , 2005 .

[2]  Jörg Müller,et al.  A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  Desiré Paelinckx,et al.  Implementing the Habitats Directive: How science can support decision making , 2015 .

[4]  J. Parviainen,et al.  Strict forest reserves in Europe: efforts to enhance biodiversity and research on forests left for free development in Europe (EU-COST-Action E4) , 2000 .

[5]  M. Brambilla,et al.  Defining favourable reference values for bird populations in Italy: setting long-term conservation targets for priority species , 2011 .

[6]  Martin Kent,et al.  Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach , 2011 .

[7]  Adrian C. Newton,et al.  Towards cost-effective indicators to maintain Natura 2000 sites in favourable conservation status. Preliminary results from Cansiglio and New Forest , 2008 .

[8]  P. Ódor,et al.  Preferences of dead wood inhabiting bryophytes for decay stage, log size and habitat types in Hungarian beech forests , 2004 .

[9]  Y. Paillet,et al.  A quantitative assessment of the ecological value of sycamore maple habitats in the French Alps , 2008, Annals of Forest Science.

[10]  P. Meyer,et al.  Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves , 2005 .

[11]  T. Vuorisalo,et al.  Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success , 2007 .

[12]  Y. Paillet,et al.  Deadwood and tree microhabitat dynamics in unharvested temperate mountain mixed forests: A life-cycle approach to biodiversity monitoring , 2014 .

[13]  G. Tímár,et al.  Relationship of Tree Stand Heterogeneity and Forest Naturalness , 2006 .

[14]  Ana Belen Garcia Hernando,et al.  Environmental diagnosis: Integrating biodiversity conservation in management of Natura 2000 forest spaces , 2010 .

[15]  M. Christensenc,et al.  Diversity of dead wood inhabiting fungi and bryophytes in semi-natural beech forests in Europe , 2006 .

[16]  A. V. Hees,et al.  Recommendations for data collection in forest reserves, with an emphasis on regeneration and stand structure , 2000 .

[17]  P. Corona,et al.  Background, main results and conclusions from a test phase for biodiversity assessments on intensive forest monitoring plots in Europe. , 2009 .

[18]  F. B. Goldsmith,et al.  Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain , 1998 .

[19]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  A grid-based, satellite-image supported, multi-attributed vegetation mapping method (MÉTA) , 2007, Folia Geobotanica.

[20]  J. Liira,et al.  Indicators of Structural and Habitat Natural Quality in Boreo-Nemoral Forests along the Management Gradient , 2009 .

[21]  Rosario Tejera,et al.  Quantitatively defining the conservation status of Natura 2000 forest habitats and improving management options for enhancing biodiversity , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[22]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  Assessing Forest Naturalness , 2012 .

[23]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  National Forest Inventory contributions to forest biodiversity monitoring , 2012 .

[24]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive, Multiscaled Approach , 2002 .

[25]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  Designing and Conducting a Forest Inventory - case: 9th National Forest Inventory of Finland , 2011 .

[26]  A. Brin,et al.  Habitat requirements of the violet click beetle (Limoniscus violaceus), an endangered umbrella species of basal hollow trees , 2015 .

[27]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  Possibilities for harmonizing national forest inventory data for use in forest biodiversity assessments , 2008 .

[28]  S. Winter.  Forest naturalness assessment as a component of biodiversity monitoring and conservation management , 2012 .

[29]  Doug Evans,et al.  THE HABITATS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS DIRECTIVE , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.