London Patient Choice Project Evaluation: A model of patients’ choices of hospital from stated and revealed preference choice data

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. Limited Electronic Distribution Rights For More Information CHILD POLICY CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world.

[1]  A. Daly,et al.  MODELS USING MIXED STATED-PREFERENCE AND REVEALED-PREFERENCE INFORMATION. , 1991 .

[2]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis , 2002, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[3]  A. Bissell,et al.  The Jackknife--Toy, Tool or Two-Edged Weapon? , 1975 .

[4]  N. Devlin,et al.  Measuring in the NHS Using patient-assessed health outcomes to manage the performance of healthcare providers , 2004 .

[5]  I. Bateman Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[6]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  M. Ryan,et al.  A ROLE FOR CONJOINT ANALYSIS IN TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE? , 1999, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  M A Cunningham,et al.  Using choice-based conjoint to determine the relative importance of dental benefit plan attributes. , 1999, Journal of dental education.

[9]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study. , 2010, Thorax.

[10]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  External validity tests of laboratory studies of information integration , 1983 .

[11]  A Ludbrook,et al.  Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[12]  T. Morikawa Correcting state dependence and serial correlation in the RP/SP combined estimation method , 1994 .

[13]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY OF A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT WITHIN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[14]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[15]  M Ryan,et al.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[16]  H Meister,et al.  Using Conjoint Analysis to Examine the Importance of Hearing Aid Attributes , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[17]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  PATIENTS' PREFERENCES REGARDING THE PROCESS AND OUTCOMES OF LIFE-SAVING TECHNOLOGY , 1999, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[18]  E. McIntosh,et al.  Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[19]  Rupert G. Miller The jackknife-a review , 1974 .

[20]  P. Shackley,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: an application to the patient health card , 1998, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[21]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. , 1997, Health economics.

[22]  J. Cairns,et al.  Establishing Patient Preferences for Blood Transfusion Support: An Application of Conjoint Analysis , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[23]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  Investigating women's preferences for intrapartum care: home versus hospital births. , 2001, Health & social care in the community.

[24]  Cinzia Cirillo,et al.  ELIMINATING BIAS DUE TO THE REPEATED MEASUREMENTS PROBLEM IN SP DATA , 1996 .

[25]  John O. Summers,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison , 1984 .

[26]  P. Shackley,et al.  Quantifying Patient Preferences for Out-of-Hours Primary Care , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[27]  C. Propper Contingent Valuation of Time Spent on NHS Waiting Lists , 1990 .

[28]  P. Zweifel,et al.  Measuring willingness-to-pay for risk reduction: an application of conjoint analysis. , 2002, Health economics.

[29]  C. Propper The Disutility of Time Spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service Waiting Lists , 1995 .

[30]  M Ryan,et al.  Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. , 1998, Health economics.