A device for in vivo measurements of quantitative ultrasound variables at the human proximal femur

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the calcaneus has similar power as a bone mineral density (BMD)- measurement using DXA for the prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk. Ultrasound equipment is less expensive than DXA and free of ionizing radiation. As a mechanical wave, QUS has the potential of measuring different bone properties than dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA,) which depends on X-ray attenuation and might be developed into a tool of comprehensive assessment of bone strength. However, site- specific DXA at the proximal femur shows best performance in the prediction of hip fractures. To combine the potential of QUS with measurements directly at the femur, we developed a device for in vivo QUS measurements at this site. Methods comprise ultrasound transmission through the bone, reflection from the bone surface, and backscat- ter from the inner trabecular structure. The complete area of the proximal femur can be scanned except at the femoral head, which interferes with the ilium. To avoid edge artifacts, a subregion of the proximal femur in the trochanteric region was selected as measurement region. First, in vivo measurements demonstrate a good signal to noise ratio and proper depiction of the proximal femur on an attenuation image. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo measurements. Further improvements can be expected by refinement of the scanning technique and data evaluation method to enhance the potential of the new method for the estimation of bone strength.

[1]  C C Glüer,et al.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. , 2000, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[2]  C-C Glüer,et al.  In vitro speed of sound measurement at intact human femur specimens. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Tommi Kärkkäinen,et al.  Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[4]  F. Padilla,et al.  In Vitro Ultrasound Measurement at the Human Femur , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[5]  V Bousson,et al.  In vitro ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous femoral bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: relationships to bone mineral density. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. Stampa,et al.  Assessment of the Geometry of Human Finger Phalanges Using Quantitative Ultrasound In Vivo , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  O. Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures , 1996 .

[8]  P. Laugier,et al.  A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur. , 2007, Bone.

[9]  J. Cauley,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1997, Archives of Internal Medicine.

[10]  Mark R Holland,et al.  Anomalous negative dispersion in bone can result from the interference of fast and slow waves. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C-C Glüer,et al.  [Quantitative ultrasound]. , 2006, Der Radiologe.

[12]  J. Kanis,et al.  An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis with Densitometry , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  C. Glüer,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current Status , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Silman,et al.  Predictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  Glüer Cc Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group. , 1997 .

[17]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[18]  F. Padilla,et al.  Effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and velocity dispersion on in vitro ultrasound velocity measurements in intact human femur specimens , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status , 1999 .

[20]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.