Embedded blended learning within an Algebra classroom: a multimedia capture experiment

This two-group, pretest-posttest, quasi-experimental study compared secondary students' learning of Algebra II materials over a 4-week period when identical instruction by the same teacher was delivered through either embedded blended learning treatment group; n=32 or a live-lecture classroom control group; n=24. For both groups, instruction was delivered in a normal classroom setting. A math test and a student survey were used to measure students' learning of Algebra II and satisfaction with the instruction. Students in the treatment group showed significantly greater gains in Algebra II test scores and evaluated their learning experiences significantly more positively than did the control group. The great majority 80% of students in the treatment group preferred the embedded blended learning over traditional live lectures for future learning of math. Students' responses to open-ended survey questions suggested that students in the treatment group appreciated the: a ability to control the pace of instruction; b new role of the classroom teacher; c lack of distraction in the blended learning environment; and d accessibility of the embedded multimedia lessons outside the classroom. This study suggests that screen-capture instructional technology can be used towards establishing a teacher-based, embedded blended learning environment within a secondary algebraic classroom.

[1]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  An evaluation study of the use of a cognitive tool in a one-to-one classroom for promoting classroom-based dialogic interaction , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[3]  J. Sweller Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[4]  A. Freeman,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2013 K-12 Edition. , 2009 .

[5]  Karen J. Graham,et al.  Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making in Algebra , 2010 .

[6]  Simon J. Thompson,et al.  Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: What are the pedagogical benefits? , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[7]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[8]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[9]  Anthony G. Picciano,et al.  K–12 ONLINE LEARNING: A SURVEY OF U.S. SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS , 2019, Online Learning.

[10]  Karla V. Kingsley,et al.  Effects of Multimedia Software on Achievement of Middle School Students in an American History Class , 2008 .

[11]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[13]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[14]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[16]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[17]  Jeffrey George Smith Screen-Capture Instructional Technology: A Cognitive Tool for Blended Learning. , 2012 .

[18]  Heather Staker,et al.  Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. , 2012 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[20]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[21]  Michael K. Barbour,et al.  Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2014: Politics, Performance, Policy, and Research Evidence. , 2015 .

[22]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[23]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. , 2010 .

[24]  Peter D. Hart,et al.  The Silent Epidemic Perspectives of High School Dropouts , 2006 .

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns , 2008 .

[26]  Blanche W. O'Bannon,et al.  Using podcasts to replace lecture: Effects on student achievement , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[28]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[29]  Sam Stringfield Why Is It so Hard to Get Good Schools? , 2004 .

[30]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Laptops and Fourth-Grade Literacy: Assisting the Jump over the Fourth-Grade Slump. , 2010 .

[31]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[32]  Matt Dunleavy,et al.  What added value does a 1: 1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[33]  Huib K. Tabbers,et al.  Learner control in animated multimedia instructions , 2010 .

[34]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[35]  Jeffrey George Smith,et al.  Screen-Capture Instructional Technology: A Cognitive Tool for Designing a Blended Multimedia Curriculum , 2012 .

[36]  Anita Woolfolk Educational psychology / Anita Woolfolk , 2007 .

[37]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social and Health Science Research , 2007 .

[38]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention Cueing as a Means to Enhance Learning from an Animation , 2007 .

[39]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[40]  James J. Appleton,et al.  Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument , 2006 .

[41]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Investigation of users’ preferences in interactive multimedia learning systems: a data mining approach , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..