The Motivational and Academic Consequences of Elementary Mathematics Environments: Do Constructivist Innovations and Reforms Make a Difference?

This study examined the effects of a videodisc-based mathematical problem-solving series known as The Adventures of Jasper Woodbury, as implemented by one school district within a constructivist-inspired reform of its math curricula. The motivational and academic consequences of both the specific innovation and the broader reforms were examined in 19 fifth-grade classrooms in two pairs of closely matched schools. One pair of schools served higher-achieving high-socioeconomic status (SES) students while the other pair served relatively lower-achieving low-SES students. Significantly larger gains on the Mathematical Problem-solving subtest of the ITBS were documented in the 10 classrooms where the Jasper activities were implemented, and in the 10 classrooms that were ranked as relatively more consistent with the broader curricular reform goals. The largest relative gains were found in the five classrooms that both used the Jasper activities and were ranked more consistent with the broader reforms. The positive consequences of both the Jasper activities and the broader reforms were documented in both pairs of schools. The implications of these results are discussed relative to current proposals for curricular reform and research on educational innovations

[1]  D. Schunk,et al.  Risk Taking: Theoretical, Empirical, and Educational Considerations , 1991 .

[2]  Sandra Graham,et al.  Motivation in African Americans , 1994 .

[3]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[4]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Learning and Instruction: European Research in an International Context: Volume 1 , 1987 .

[5]  Barbara Means,et al.  Teaching advanced skills to at-risk students : views from research and practice , 1991 .

[6]  Gerard Seegers,et al.  Task Motivation and Mathematics Achievement in Actual Task Situations. , 1993 .

[7]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[9]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[10]  E. Pellicer.  Anchored Instruction and Its Relationship to Situated Cognition , 1990 .

[11]  Walter Dick,et al.  An Instructional Designer's View of Constructivism. , 1991 .

[12]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Motivation and contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives , 1997 .

[13]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[14]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development , 1997 .

[15]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  When researchers swim upstream: reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media , 1991 .

[16]  K. Sheingold,et al.  Restructuring for Learning with Technology: The Potential for Synergy. , 1991 .

[17]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[18]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[19]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[20]  Donald R. Brown,et al.  Student motivation, cognition, and learning : essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie , 1994 .

[21]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  The Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education , 1989 .

[22]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Intentional Learning as a Goal of Instruction , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[23]  Samuel Richmond.  Report to the President on the Use of Technology to Strengthen K-12 Education in the United States , 1998 .

[24]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. , 1994 .