New Self Curing Root Canal Filling Material : Gutta flow 2

Aim: To evaluate the apical microleakage with Gutta Flow 2 as an obturating material with or without use of master gutta percha cone as compared to lateral compaction with gutta percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer. Methods: A total of thirty extracted human mandibular molars were decoronated, sectioned and instrumented with r otary protapers size F1. Teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 10 each labelled as Group G1 (lateral compaction), G2 (guttaflow 2 with master cone), and G3 (guttaflow 2 without master cone). All the teeth were given two coats of nail varnish leav ing 2 mm at the apex. Teeth were immersed in India ink for 48 hrs, demineralized and cleared with methyl salicylate using Robertson’s technique. The apical dye penetration was examined using a stereomicroscope. Results: The mean dye penetration was recorded to be maximum for guttaflow 2 without master cone i.e. 0.69 mm whereas the mean dye penetration value for all canals obturated with guttaflow 2 with master cone was found to be minimum i.e. 0.35 mm w hich was comparable to that of lateral compaction technique i.e. 0.36. On statistical anal ysis, no statistical significant differences were revealed in terms of sealing ability of guttaflow 2 with master cone and lateral compaction whereas it was statistical significant between gutt aflow 2 without master cone and guttaflow 2 with master cone, and guttaflow 2 without master co ne and lateral compaction. Conclusion: The apical sealing ability of Guttaflow 2 with mast er cone was comparable to the gold standard of lateral compaction.

[1]  Harpreet Singh,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative comparative evaluation of sealing ability of guttaflow, thermoplasticized gutta percha and lateral compaction for root canal obturation: a cohort, controlled, ex-vivo study. , 2013 .

[2]  Bansal Rajinder,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative comparative evaluation of sealing ability of guttaflow, thermoplasticized gutta percha and lateral compaction for root canal obturation: a cohort, controlled, ex-vivo study. , 2013, Oral health and dental management.

[3]  Yu-Hsiung Wang,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[4]  Vikas Punia,et al.  An in vitro assessment of apical microleakage in root canals obturated with gutta-flow, resilon, thermafil and lateral condensation: A stereomicroscopic study , 2011, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[5]  M. Parande,et al.  A comparative evaluation of 3 root canal filling systems. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  K. Kodonas,et al.  Short- and long-term sealing ability of Gutta-flow and AH-Plus using an ex vivo fluid transport model. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[7]  J. Wataha,et al.  Long-term sealing ability of Pulp Canal Sealer, AH-Plus, GuttaFlow and Epiphany. , 2008, International endodontic journal.

[8]  G. De-Deus,et al.  The sealing ability of GuttaFlow in oval-shaped canals: an ex vivo study using a polymicrobial leakage model. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[9]  F. Tay,et al.  Water sorption and solubility of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  K. Bekes,et al.  Apical sealing ability of 2 epoxy resin-based sealers used with root canal obturation techniques based on warm gutta-percha compared to cold lateral condensation. , 2007, Quintessence International.

[11]  Mônica Sampaio do Vale,et al.  Methodologies for assessment of apical and coronal leakage of endodontic filling materials: a critical review. , 2006, Journal of oral science.

[12]  A. Aptekar,et al.  Comparative analysis of microleakage and seal for 2 obturation materials: Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha. , 2006, Journal.

[13]  R. Weiger,et al.  Homogeneity and adaptation of a new gutta-percha paste to root canal walls. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  V. Gopikrishna,et al.  In-vitro evaluation of apical micro leakage of thermafil and Obtura II sheated gutta percha in comparison with cold lateral condensation using fluid filtration system , 2005, Endodontology.

[15]  A. Khayat,et al.  AN IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF APICAL SEAL ABILITY OF THERMAFIL OBTURATION VERSUS LATERAL CONDENSATION , 2004 .

[16]  N. Gençoḡlu Comparison of 6 different gutta-percha techniques (part II): Thermafil, JS Quick-Fill, Soft Core, Microseal, System B, and lateral condensation. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  M. L. Hicks,et al.  Comparison of laterally condensed .06 and .02 tapered Gutta-Percha and sealer in vitro. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  K. Fox,et al.  An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root-canal-treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[19]  D. Edmunds,et al.  Variation in the microleakage produced by four different techniques in root fillings in a simulated root canal model. , 1996, International endodontic journal.

[20]  L. Spångberg,et al.  Comparison of apical leakage in root canals obturated with various gutta percha techniques using a dye vacuum tracing method. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  E. Brewer,et al.  A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. , 1980, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  R E Walton,et al.  The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. , 1979, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  Stephen Cohen,et al.  Pathways of the Pulp , 1976 .

[24]  P. Machtou,et al.  Chapter 13 OUTCOME OF ENDODONTIC TREATMENT AND RETREATMENT , 2022 .