Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences

This research addresses three questions: (1) Why are some organizations more market-oriented than others? (2) What effect does a market orientation have on employees and business performance? (3) Does the linkage between a market orientation and business performance depend on the environmental context? The findings from two national samples suggest that a market orientation is related to top management emphasis on the orientation, risk aversion of top managers, interdepartmental conflict and connectedness, centralization, and reward system orientation. Furthermore, the findings suggest that a market orientation is related to overall (judgmental) business performance (but not market share), employees’ organizational commitment, and esprit de corps. Finally, the linkage between a market orientation and performance appears to be robust across environmental contexts that are characterized by varying degrees of market turbulence, competitive intensity, and technological turbulence.

[1]  Robert Elias,et al.  Conflict and power , 1993 .

[2]  J. Farley,et al.  Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis , 1993 .

[3]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Becoming more market oriented : an exploratory study of the programmatic and market-back approaches , 1991 .

[4]  Richard Staelin,et al.  Environment, Market Share, and Market Power , 1990 .

[5]  George S. Day,et al.  Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value , 1990 .

[6]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. , 1990 .

[7]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[8]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[9]  F. Webster,et al.  Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda: , 1989 .

[10]  E. Rogers,et al.  Innovations and Organizations , 1988 .

[11]  Bernard J. Jaworski Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[12]  F. Webster The rediscovery of the marketing concept , 1988 .

[13]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[14]  Frederick E. Webster,et al.  Rediscovering the marketing concept , 1988 .

[15]  D. Aaker,et al.  The Strategic Role of Product Quality , 1987 .

[16]  Gene R. Laczniak,et al.  The Evolving Marketing Concept, Competitive Intensity and Organizational Performance: , 1987 .

[17]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework , 1987 .

[18]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence , 1987 .

[19]  Franklin S. Houston The Marketing Concept: What it is and What it is Not , 1986 .

[20]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[21]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[22]  J. F. Gaski The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution , 1984 .

[23]  P. F. Anderson,et al.  A Reward/Measurement Model of Organizational Buying Behavior , 1985 .

[24]  Alvin J. Silk,et al.  Measuring Influence in Organizational Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[25]  H. J. Arnold Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues , 1982 .

[26]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis , 1982 .

[27]  J. Millman,et al.  Toward Reform of Program Evaluation , 1981 .

[28]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Beyond the marketing concept , 1979 .

[29]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[30]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[31]  E. Lawler,et al.  Information and control in organizations , 1978 .

[32]  Gene R. Laczniak,et al.  The future of marketing strategy , 1976 .

[33]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Accounting and human behaviour , 1976 .

[34]  Edward M. Tauber,et al.  How market research discourages major innovation , 1974 .

[35]  R. Oaxaca Another Look at Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions , 1974 .

[36]  I. Parket,et al.  The practice of business: The current status of corporate social responsibility , 1973 .

[37]  Carlton P. Mcnamara The Present Status of the Marketing Concept , 1972 .

[38]  H. Barksdale,et al.  Marketers’ Attitudes toward the Marketing Concept , 1971 .

[39]  A. Kaldor Imbricative Marketing , 1971 .

[40]  Craig C. Lundberg,et al.  Social change in complex organizations , 1970 .

[41]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[42]  R. Hall,et al.  Organizational Size, Complexity, and Formalization , 1967 .

[43]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis , 1966 .

[44]  R. T. Hise Have Manufacturing Firms Adopted the Marketing Concept? , 1965 .

[45]  G. Weckel The marketing management concept , 1964 .

[46]  A. Felton,et al.  Making the marketing concept work , 1959 .