Swell Noise Suppression by Wiener Prediction Filter

Abstract The conventional method to remove swell noise from raw seismic data is band–pass filtering (BPF). It ideally removes whole low frequency band of the spectral content, which results in a total loss of the amplitudes concerning the low frequency reflections from deeper reflectors, and hence lower resolution in the deeper reflection events. The procedure described here attenuates swell noise from seismic data while preserving the reflection amplitudes at low frequency band. The proposed Wiener prediction filter (WPF) method is used to estimate the swell noise embedded in the raw marine seismic data and then the estimated noise is subtracted from shots by a trace–by–trace basis. It is observed that the deeper reflections have significantly higher amplitudes and show better trace–by–trace consistency in the final migration sections obtained by the WPF application. The WPF method removes most of the swell noise and may be an alternative filtering technique to the conventional BPF method. It can be used with high resolution marine seismic data which may have weaker reflection amplitudes from deeper reflectors. It also improves the lateral continuity of the events which may be useful for auto–picking tools such as automatic event tracking. We propose that the method can effectively be used to remove any type of coherent noise providing that a suitable noise model can be determined from the data itself.

[1]  S. Treitel PREDICTIVE DECONVOLUTION: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1969 .

[2]  Yusuf Bayrak,et al.  Using the Wiener-Levinson algorithm to suppress ground-roll , 2004 .

[3]  Doyle R. Watts,et al.  Attenuation of marine wave swell noise by stacking in the wavelet packet domain , 1999 .

[4]  D. R. Martinez,et al.  Resolution performance of Wiener filters , 1983 .

[5]  E. Robinson,et al.  OPTIMUM DIGITAL FILTERS FOR SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO ENHANCEMENT , 1969 .

[6]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  LEAST‐SQUARES INVERSE FILTERING AND WAVELET DECONVOLUTION , 1977 .

[7]  Tadeusz J. Ulrych,et al.  Signal and noise separation: Art and science , 1999 .

[8]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  A Statistical Technique For High Amplitude Noise Detection: Application to Swell Noise Attenuation , 2008 .

[9]  Thomas Elboth,et al.  Time‐frequency seismic data de‐noising , 2010 .

[10]  Robert G. Clapp,et al.  (t,x) domain, pattern‐based ground roll removal , 2000 .

[11]  James G. Smith Amplitude and phase effects of weather noise , 1999 .

[12]  Alan Ryder,et al.  Swell-noise Attenuation Using an Iterative FX Prediction Filtering Approach , 2008 .

[13]  E. Robinson Predictive decomposition of time series with application to seismic exploration , 1967 .

[14]  Guillaume Cambois,et al.  Can We Surgically Remove Swell Noise , 1995 .

[15]  P. Schultz,et al.  Fundamentals of geophysical data processing , 1979 .

[16]  Jiuying Guo,et al.  High-amplitude Noise Attenuation , 2003 .

[17]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Separation of signal and coherent noise by migration filtering , 2000 .

[18]  A. Ozbek Coherent Noise Attenuation by Adaptive Filtering and Beamforming , 2000 .

[19]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  High-amplitude noise detection by the expectation-maximization algorithm with application to swell-noise attenuation , 2010 .

[20]  Thomas Elboth,et al.  Flow and swell noise in marine seismic data , 2009 .

[21]  Stephen K. Chiu,et al.  Attenuation of Coherent Noise Using Localized-adaptive Eigenimage Filter , 2008 .