Who are influential in Q&A communities? A measure of V-Constraint based on knowledge diffusion capability

Recent years have witnessed a surge of research on the identification of key users in online communities. However, seldom research has focused on their knowledge diffusion capabilities. The purpose of this study is to propose a new measure to find key users who perform well in knowledge diffusion in order to promote users’ active participation in Q&A communities. In particular, this article develops an improved measure consolidating both users’ structural hole and knowledge diffusion capability and evaluates its performance through a field study involving 230,000 users and more than 132 million network relations of users. Our results show that our proposed measure can be used to detect key users who occupy structural holes’ advantages in social networks. In addition, key users detected by our proposed measure generally perform well on nearly all dimensions of knowledge diffusion capability compared with other measures of key users. Our study entails important theoretical and practical contributions.

[1]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[2]  Wei Wei,et al.  Knowledge transmission model with consideration of self-learning mechanism in complex networks , 2017, Appl. Math. Comput..

[3]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Bin Cao,et al.  Modeling of knowledge transmission by considering the level of forgetfulness in complex networks , 2016 .

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[6]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  Corrigendum: Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation , 2015, Nature.

[7]  Xiao Ma,et al.  Understanding Members’ Active Participation in Online Question-and-Answer Communities: A Theory and Empirical Analysis , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Pnina Fichman,et al.  A comparative assessment of answer quality on four question answering sites , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Duanbing Chen,et al.  Vital nodes identification in complex networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[10]  Peng Liu,et al.  A study on coevolutionary dynamics of knowledge diffusion and social network structure , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Samee Ullah Khan,et al.  Analysis of Online Social Network Connections for Identification of Influential Users , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[12]  Christian Scheunert,et al.  Using LTI Dynamics to Identify the Influential Nodes in a Network , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Li Zhai,et al.  Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[16]  J. Spencer,et al.  Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks , 2003 .

[17]  Hung-Yu Kao,et al.  Finding Hard Questions by Knowledge Gap Analysis in Question Answer Communities , 2010, AIRS.

[18]  Li Zhao,et al.  Sharing Knowledge in Social Q&A Sites: The Unintended Consequences of Extrinsic Motivation , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[20]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[22]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[23]  Min Lin,et al.  Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer , 2010 .

[24]  Zhu Zhang Weighing Stars: Aggregating Online Product Reviews for Intelligent E-commerce Applications , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[25]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[26]  Chiu-Chi Wei,et al.  Knowledge management: modeling the knowledge diffusion in community of practice , 2007, Kybernetes.

[27]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[28]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[29]  Chih-Ming Tsai,et al.  Integrating intra-firm and inter-firm knowledge diffusion into the knowledge diffusion model , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.