Science on Television in the 21st Century

Twenty-five years after George Gerbner and colleagues’ seminal report on television and science attitudes, there is a need to update the data on television’s portrayals of science and to revisit the cultivation question. We address this need by analyzing 21st-century television depictions of science and examining the relationships between exposure to television and attitudes toward science with an analysis of 2006 General Social Survey data. Content results show that scientists appear infrequently in prime-time dramatic programs, are typically White males, and are frequently cast in good or mixed roles rather than as evil scientists. Regarding the cultivation effect, we do not find a significant direct relationship between television viewing and negative attitudes toward science after relevant controls are taken into account. Additional results, however, indicate a displacement effect of television viewing on science attitudes and show significant interaction effects consistent with mainstreaming.

[1]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[2]  W. Schramm,et al.  THE MASS MEDIA AS SOURCES OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, SCIENCE, AND HEALTH KNOWLEDGE , 1969 .

[3]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Diversity of Television Exposure and its Association with the Cultivation of Concern for Environmental Risks , 2010 .

[4]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation , 2000 .

[5]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Scientists on the TV screen , 1981 .

[6]  Steven Miller,et al.  Public understanding of science at the crossroads , 2001 .

[7]  D. Pearl,et al.  Television and behavior : ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties , 1982 .

[8]  J Shrum,et al.  Mainstreaming, resonance, and impersonal impact : Testing moderators of the cultivation effect for estimates of crime risk , 2001 .

[9]  L. Gross,et al.  Growing Up with Television: Cultivation Processes , 2002 .

[10]  James Shanahan,et al.  Television and its Viewers: Cultivation Theory and Research , 1999 .

[11]  Robert A. Logan,et al.  Science Mass Communication , 2001 .

[12]  James Shanahan,et al.  Television and Authoritarianism: Exploring the Concept of Mainstreaming , 1998 .

[13]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[14]  Sidney Perkowitz,et al.  Hollywood Science: Movies, Science, and the End of the World , 2007 .

[15]  B. Davis,et al.  Science and engineering indicators—1996 , 1997 .

[16]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Violence in Television Programs: Ten Years Later , 1982 .

[17]  J. Durant,et al.  The public understanding of science , 1989, Nature.

[18]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Television viewing, IQ and academic achievement , 1980 .

[19]  Charles T. Salmon Communication Yearbook 34 , 2010 .

[20]  Shinichi Saito,et al.  Television and the Cultivation of Gender‐Role Attitudes in Japan: Does Television Contribute to the Maintenance of the Status Quo? , 2007 .

[21]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[22]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Science TV news exposure predicts science beliefs: Real world effects , 2009 .

[23]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Emerging Agendas at the Intersection of Political and Science Communication The Case of Nanotechnology , 2010 .

[24]  Chris Mooney,et al.  Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future , 2009 .

[25]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology , 2006 .

[26]  Kieran Walsh,et al.  Everything bad is good for you , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  S. Chaffee,et al.  How Americans Get Political Information: Print Versus Broadcast News , 1996 .

[28]  J. Besley,et al.  Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology , 2005 .

[29]  Patrick Sturgis,et al.  Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis , 2008 .

[30]  M. Morgan,et al.  Television and its Viewers: List of figures , 1999 .

[31]  JoEllen Fisherkeller,et al.  Growing Up with Television , 2002 .

[32]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects : advances in theory and research , 2002 .

[33]  Karyn Riddle,et al.  Personality Traits, Television Viewing, and the Cultivation Effect , 2008 .

[34]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[35]  William P. Eveland Interactions and Nonlinearity in Mass Communication: Connecting Theory and Methodology , 1997 .

[36]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Green or brown? Television and the cultivation of environmental concern , 1997 .

[37]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[38]  Jennifer Ellen Good,et al.  The Cultivation, Mainstreaming, and Cognitive Processing of Environmentalists Watching Television , 2009 .

[39]  Jon D. Miller Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2004 .

[40]  George Gerbner,et al.  Science on Television: How It Affects Public Conceptions. , 1987 .

[41]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[42]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  Cultivation Effects on Quality of Life Indicators: Exploring the Effects of American Television Consumption on Feelings of Relative Deprivation in South Korea and India , 2008 .

[43]  Karl Erik Rosengren,et al.  Cultural indicators : an International Symposium , 1987 .

[44]  Anders Hansen,et al.  The mass media and environmental issues , 1993 .

[45]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Television and its Viewers: Index , 1999 .

[46]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic—survey research divide , 2007 .