Black border, mask 3D effects: covering challenges of EUV mask architecture for 22nm node and beyond

Photomask is at the heart of a lithographic scanner’s optical path. It cannot be left non-optimized from the imaging point of view. In this work we provide new insights on two critical aspects of EUV mask architecture: optimization of absorber for 16 nm half-pitch imaging and a systematic approach to black border EUV and DUV reflectance specifications. Good 16 nm imaging is demonstrated on ASML NXE:3300 EUV scanner. Currently a relatively high dose resist is used for imaging and the dose reduction is desired. Optimization (reduction) of absorber height and mask CD bias can allow for up to 30% dose reduction without essential contrast loss. Disadvantages of absorber height reduction are ~7 nm increase of best focus range through pitch and tighter absorber height mean to target and uniformity requirements. A disadvantage of a smaller reticle CD (down to 14 nm 1x) is manufacturing process uniformity over the reticle. A systematic approach of black border reflections impact on imaging is established. The image border is a pattern free dark area surrounding the image field and preventing exposure of the image field neighborhood on wafer. Currently accepted design of the black border on EUV reticle is an image border where the absorber and multilayer stack are etched down to the substrate and EUV reflectance is reduced to <0.05%. DUV reflectance of such a black border is about 5%. It is shown that a tighter DUV reflectance specification <1.5% is required driven by the impact of DUV reflections from the black border on imaging. NXE:3300 and NXE:3100 experimental imaging results are shown. The need of low DUV wavelength reflectance metrology (in the range 100-300 nm) is demonstrated using an estimated NXE scanner out-of-band DUV spectrum. Promising results of low DUV reflectance of the black border are shown.

[1]  John Zimmerman,et al.  EUVL mask performance and optimization , 2012, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[2]  Naoya Hayashi,et al.  Direct phase-shift measurement of thin and thick absorber EUV masks , 2012, Other Conferences.

[3]  Shinpei Kondo,et al.  Impact of an etched EUV mask black border on imaging: part II , 2013, Photomask Technology.

[4]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  Imaging performance and challenges of 10nm and 7nm logic nodes with 0.33 NA EUV , 2014, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[5]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Mask aspects of EUVL imaging at 27nm node and below , 2011, Photomask Technology.

[6]  Bruce W. Smith,et al.  Feasibility of compensating for EUV field edge effects through OPC , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Natalia Davydova,et al.  Imaging performance improvements by EUV mask stack optimization , 2011, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[8]  Takeshi Isogawa,et al.  Black border with etched multilayer on EUV mask , 2012, Other Conferences.

[9]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  Achievements and challenges of EUV mask imaging , 2014, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[10]  Paul van Adrichem,et al.  EUV source-mask optimization for 7nm node and beyond , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Vicky Philipsen,et al.  Actinic characterization and modeling of the EUV mask stack , 2013, Other Conferences.

[12]  Norihito Fukugami,et al.  Experimental approach to EUV imaging enhancement by mask absorber height optimization , 2013, Other Conferences.

[13]  Shinpei Kondo,et al.  Impact of an etched EUV mask black border on imaging and overlay , 2012, Photomask Technology.

[14]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Study of CD variation caused by the black border effect and out-of-band radiation in extreme ultraviolet lithography , 2014 .

[15]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  EUV lithography: NXE platform performance overview , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Eric Hendrickx,et al.  Deep ultraviolet out-of-band characterization of EUVL scanners and resists , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Theodore H. Fedynyshyn,et al.  Deep ultraviolet out-of-band contribution in extreme ultraviolet lithography: predictions and experiments , 2011, Advanced Lithography.