Automated Tuning of Double Quantum Dots into Specific Charge States Using Neural Networks

While quantum dots are at the forefront of quantum device technology, tuning multi-dot systems requires a lengthy experimental process as multiple parameters need to be accurately controlled. This process becomes increasingly time-consuming and difficult to perform manually as the devices become more complex and the number of tuning parameters grows. In this work, we present a crucial step towards automated tuning of quantum dot qubits. We introduce an algorithm driven by machine learning that uses a small number of coarse-grained measurements as its input and tunes the quantum dot system into a pre-selected charge state. We train and test our algorithm on a GaAs double quantum dot device and we consistently arrive at the desired state or its immediate neighborhood.

[1]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[2]  Jacob M. Taylor,et al.  Quantum-dot-based resonant exchange qubit. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[3]  Easwar Magesan,et al.  Machine Learning for Discriminating Quantum Measurement Trajectories and Improving Readout. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[4]  Fei Yan,et al.  A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits , 2019, Applied Physics Reviews.

[5]  T. Ihn,et al.  Spin and Valley States in Gate-Defined Bilayer Graphene Quantum Dots , 2018, Physical Review X.

[6]  K. W. Chan,et al.  Autonomous Tuning and Charge-State Detection of Gate-Defined Quantum Dots , 2019, Physical Review Applied.

[7]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Soundness and completeness of quantum root-mean-square errors , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[8]  M. Manfra,et al.  Scaling of Majorana Zero-Bias Conductance Peaks. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[9]  W. V. D. Wiel,et al.  Electron transport through double quantum dots , 2002, cond-mat/0205350.

[10]  H. Neven,et al.  Physical qubit calibration on a directed acyclic graph , 2018, 1803.03226.

[11]  Werner Wegscheider,et al.  Microwave Photon-Mediated Interactions between Semiconductor Qubits , 2018, Physical Review X.

[12]  J. R. Petta,et al.  Long-Range Microwave Mediated Interactions Between Electron Spins , 2019 .

[13]  C. K. Andersen,et al.  Coherent microwave photon mediated coupling between a semiconductor and a superconductor qubit , 2018 .

[14]  R. Schirhagl,et al.  Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: nanoscale sensors for physics and biology. , 2014, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[15]  D. Loss,et al.  From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowires , 2019, 1911.04512.

[16]  C. K. Andersen,et al.  Quantum parameter estimation with a neural network , 2017, 1711.05238.

[17]  G. Burkard,et al.  Quadrupolar Exchange-Only Spin Qubit. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[18]  Morten Kjaergaard,et al.  Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play , 2019, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.

[19]  K. Mølmer,et al.  Conditioned spin and charge dynamics of a single electron quantum dot , 2017, 1708.06680.

[20]  L. Vandersypen,et al.  Automated tuning of inter-dot tunnel coupling in double quantum dots , 2018, Applied Physics Letters.

[21]  Andreas D. Wieck,et al.  A machine learning approach for automated fine-tuning of semiconductor spin qubits , 2019, Applied Physics Letters.

[22]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  Efficiently measuring a quantum device using machine learning , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[23]  Mark Friesen,et al.  Electrical control of a long-lived spin qubit in a Si/SiGe quantum dot. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[24]  L. Vandersypen,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Coherent Control of a Single Electron Spin with Electric Fields Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 and S2 References , 2022 .

[25]  Xuedong Hu,et al.  Fast hybrid silicon double-quantum-dot qubit. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[26]  Sophie Shermer Training Schrödinger’s cat: quantum optimal control , 2015 .

[27]  A. Wallraff,et al.  Coherent spin–photon coupling using a resonant exchange qubit , 2017, Nature.

[28]  J. Koski,et al.  Virtual-photon-mediated spin-qubit–transmon coupling , 2019, Nature Communications.

[29]  Y. Oreg,et al.  Majorana zero modes in superconductor–semiconductor heterostructures , 2017, Nature Reviews Materials.

[30]  B. P. Wuetz,et al.  Quantum dot arrays in silicon and germanium , 2019, Applied Physics Letters.

[31]  Jacob M. Taylor,et al.  Machine learning techniques for state recognition and auto-tuning in quantum dots , 2017, npj Quantum Information.

[32]  J. Koski,et al.  Coherent long-distance spin-qubit-transmon coupling , 2019, 1903.04022.

[33]  E. R. MacQuarrie,et al.  Autotuning of double dot devices in situ with machine learning. , 2020, Physical review applied.

[34]  T. Ihn,et al.  Fully automated identification of 2D material samples. , 2019, 1911.00066.

[35]  D. J. Twitchen,et al.  A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quantum Memory up to One Minute , 2019, Physical Review X.

[36]  L. Deng,et al.  The MNIST Database of Handwritten Digit Images for Machine Learning Research [Best of the Web] , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[37]  Aurélien Géron,et al.  Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems , 2017 .

[38]  Xuedong Hu,et al.  Tunable Hybrid Qubit in a GaAs Double Quantum Dot. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[39]  M. Y. Simmons,et al.  A two-qubit gate between phosphorus donor electrons in silicon , 2019, Nature.