Governing the Interplay between Industrial Ecosystems and Environmental Regulation

Many scholars of industrial ecology have focused on the institutional and organizational challenges of building and maintaining regional industrial symbiosis through the synergistic integration of material and energy flows. Despite the promise that these intellectual developments hold for the future dematerialization of industrial production, they rarely address the actual regulatory obstacles of turning wastes into raw materials. In this article we introduce a potential future industrial symbiosis around the Gulf of Bothnia between Finland and Sweden, and assess the regulatory bottlenecks related to waste by‐product consideration. We find that although the Gulf of Bothnia region has technological and economic potential for industrial symbiosis, the regulatory support for this is insufficient. We suggest a common pool resource‐based governance system that could utilize market and regulatory mechanisms in a regional‐level cross‐border system of governance. Importantly, the suggested governance system would protect the users of potential raw materials from unpredictable waste regulation, market risks related to large‐scale material flows, and societal risks of hazardous waste treatment.

[1]  J. Bergh.  Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics , 1999 .

[2]  J. Golub.  The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. By Oran R. Young. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. 221p. $55.00 cloth, $21.95 paper , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[3]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[4]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  The metrics of material and metal ecology : Harmonizing the resource, technology and environmental cycles , 2005 .

[5]  Marian Chertow,et al.  The Eco‐industrial Park Model Reconsidered , 1998 .

[6]  M. Bertram,et al.  Where has all the copper gone: The stocks and flows project, part 1 , 2002 .

[7]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[8]  J. McClelland.  FASTMET ® : Proven Process for Steel Mill Waste Recovery , 2003 .

[9]  J. Prins.  Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[10]  Environmental instruments and institutions , 1999 .

[11]  I. Costa,et al.  Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. , 2010 .

[12]  M. Chertow.  “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[13]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  A critical appraisal of an UK county waste minimisation programme: The requirement for regional facilitated development of industrial symbiosis/ecology , 2006 .

[14]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[15]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[16]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[17]  Robert B. Gordon,et al.  The Multilevel Cycle of Anthropogenic Zinc , 2005 .

[18]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[19]  Hiroshi Ichikawa,et al.  Effective use of steelmaking dust and sludge by use of rotary hearth furnace , 2002 .