Review: Precision nutrition of ruminants: approaches, challenges and potential gains.

A plethora of sensors and information technologies with applications to the precision nutrition of herbivores have been developed and continue to be developed. The nutritional processes start outside of the animal body with the available feed (quantity and quality) and continue inside it once the feed is consumed, degraded in the gastrointestinal tract and metabolised by organs and tissues. Finally, some nutrients are wasted via urination, defecation and gaseous emissions through breathing and belching whereas remaining nutrients ensure maintenance and production. Nowadays, several processes can be monitored in real-time using new technologies, but although these provide valuable data 'as is', further gains could be obtained using this information as inputs to nutrition simulation models to predict unmeasurable variables in real-time and to forecast outcomes of interest. Data provided by sensors can create synergies with simulation models and this approach has the potential to expand current applications. In addition, data provided by sensors could be used with advanced analytical techniques such as data fusion, optimisation techniques and machine learning to improve their value for applications in precision animal nutrition. The present paper reviews technologies that can monitor different nutritional processes relevant to animal production, profitability, environmental management and welfare. We discussed the model-data fusion approach in which data provided by sensor technologies can be used as input of nutrition simulation models in near-real time to produce more accurate, certain and timely predictions. We also discuss some examples that have taken this model-data fusion approach to complement the capabilities of both models and sensor data, and provided examples such as predicting feed intake and methane emissions. Challenges with automatising the nutritional management of individual animals include monitoring and predicting of the flow of nutrients including nutrient intake, quantity and composition of body growth and milk production, gestation, maintenance and physical activities at the individual animal level. We concluded that the livestock industries are already seeing benefits from the development of sensor and information technologies, and this benefit is expected to grow exponentially soon with the integration of nutrition simulation models and techniques for big data analysis. However, this approach may need re-evaluating or performing new empirical research in both fields of animal nutrition and simulation modelling to accommodate a new type of data provided by the sensor technologies.

[1]  P. Koerkamp,et al.  Automated body weight prediction of dairy cows using 3-dimensional vision. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  Jean-Marie Aerts,et al.  Is precision livestock farming an engineer's daydream or nightmare, an animal's friend or foe, and a farmer's panacea or pitfall? , 2008 .

[3]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  A review of applications of model–data fusion to studies of terrestrial carbon fluxes at different scales , 2009 .

[4]  Valerie O. Snow,et al.  The challenges - and some solutions - to process-based modelling of grazed agricultural systems , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Cawkwell,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of grasslands : from observation to management , 2016 .

[6]  Matthias Rothmund,et al.  Precision agriculture on grassland : Applications, perspectives and constraints , 2008 .

[7]  P. Valencia,et al.  Intra-ruminal gas-sensing in real time: a proof-of-concept , 2016 .

[8]  Frank Rosner,et al.  The agreement between two next-generation laser methane detectors and respiration chamber facilities in recording methane concentrations in the spent air produced by dairy cows , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[9]  John M. Antle,et al.  Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Information and communication technology , 2017, Agricultural systems.

[10]  W. Paterson,et al.  Estimating metabolic heat loss in birds and mammals by combining infrared thermography with biophysical modelling. , 2011, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[11]  M. M. Campos,et al.  Phenotypically divergent classification of preweaned heifer calves for feed efficiency indexes and their correlations with heat production and thermography. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J M Bewley,et al.  Short communication: Measuring feed volume and weight by machine vision. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  A. D. Mitchell,et al.  Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[14]  B. Henry,et al.  Modelling methane emissions from remotely collected liveweight data and faecal near-infrared spectroscopy in beef cattle , 2014 .

[15]  M. Endres,et al.  Technical note: Validation of an ear-tag accelerometer sensor to determine rumination, eating, and activity behaviors of grazing dairy cattle. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  S. Moore,et al.  Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[17]  K. Chon,et al.  Monitoring of Heart and Breathing Rates Using Dual Cameras on a Smartphone , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Luciano A. González,et al.  Wireless sensor networks to study, monitor and manage cattle in grazing systems , 2014 .

[19]  W. Wales,et al.  Invited review: An evaluation of the likely effects of individualized feeding of concentrate supplements to pasture-based dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  G. Dryden,et al.  Prediction of diet quality for sheep from faecal characteristics: comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy and conventional chemistry predictive models , 2015 .

[21]  F. Schenkel,et al.  Assessing feed efficiency in beef steers through feeding behavior, infrared thermography and glucocorticoids. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[22]  A. Dolev,et al.  Energy cost of cows' grazing activity: Use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[23]  Nils Zehner,et al.  System specification and validation of a noseband pressure sensor for measurement of ruminating and eating behavior in stable-fed cows , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[24]  Toby Mottram,et al.  Technical note: A wireless telemetric method of monitoring clinical acidosis in dairy cows , 2008 .

[25]  R. Hegarty Applicability of short-term emission measurements for on-farm quantification of enteric methane. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[26]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  Evaluation of an electronic cowside test to detect subclinical ketosis in dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  Andrea Pezzuolo,et al.  On-barn pig weight estimation based on body measurements by a Kinect v1 depth camera , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[28]  A. Brosh,et al.  Heart rate measurements as an index of energy expenditure and energy balance in ruminants: a review. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[29]  T. Stokol,et al.  Method comparison and validation of a prototype device for measurement of ionized calcium concentrations cow-side against a point-of-care instrument and a benchtop blood-gas analyzer reference method. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  Tim A. McAllister,et al.  Validation of a radio frequency identification system for monitoring the feeding patterns of feedlot cattle , 1999 .

[31]  R. S. Swingle,et al.  Nutrient requirements of beef cattle , 1986 .

[32]  M. Shepherd,et al.  Evaluation of urine excretion from dairy cows under two farm systems using urine sensors , 2017 .

[33]  Luis Orlindo Tedeschi,et al.  Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models , 2006 .

[34]  G. J. Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Use of sensor-determined behaviours to develop algorithms for pasture intake by individual grazing cattle , 2017, Crop and Pasture Science.

[35]  Ilan Halachmi,et al.  Automatic assessment of dairy cattle body condition score using thermal imaging , 2013 .

[36]  J. Goopy,et al.  Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[37]  Ilias Kyriazakis,et al.  Automated tracking to measure behavioural changes in pigs for health and welfare monitoring , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[38]  I Kyriazakis,et al.  The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  D. Coates,et al.  Review: Near Infrared Spectroscopy of Faeces to Evaluate the Nutrition and Physiology of Herbivores , 2009 .

[40]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Evaluation of the laser methane detector to estimate methane emissions from ewes and steers. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[41]  T Mottram,et al.  Animal board invited review: precision livestock farming for dairy cows with a focus on oestrus detection. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[42]  K. Umemura,et al.  Technical note: Estimation of feed intake while grazing using a wireless system requiring no halter. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[44]  R. Hand,et al.  Individual intake of mineral and molasses supplements by cows, heifers and calves , 2000 .

[45]  J. D. Oldham,et al.  The Ruminant Nutrition System: An Applied Model for Predicting Nutrient Requirements and Feed Utilization in Ruminants , eds L. O. TEDESCHI & D. G. FOX . 578 pp. Ann Arbor, MI: XanEdu (2016). US $104.69 (hardback). ISBN 978-1-58390-236-3 , 2017, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[46]  Diego H. Milone,et al.  Acoustic monitoring of short-term ingestive behavior and intake in grazing sheep , 2011 .

[47]  Greg Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Behavioral classification of data from collars containing motion sensors in grazing cattle , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[48]  P. Faverdin,et al.  Rear shape in 3 dimensions summarized by principal component analysis is a good predictor of body condition score in Holstein dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[49]  G. Cronin,et al.  The Behavioural Responses of Beef Cattle (Bos taurus) to Declining Pasture Availability and the Use of GNSS Technology to Determine Grazing Preference , 2017 .

[50]  David W. Lamb,et al.  A Combination of Plant NDVI and LiDAR Measurements Improve the Estimation of Pasture Biomass in Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea var. Fletcher) , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[51]  K. Schwartzkopf-Genswein,et al.  Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review) , 2012 .

[52]  S. McGinn Developments in micrometeorological methods for methane measurements. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[53]  J M Bewley,et al.  Potential for estimation of body condition scores in dairy cattle from digital images. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[54]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Estimation of grass intake on pasture for dairy cows using tightly and loosely mounted di- and tri-axial accelerometers combined with bite count , 2013 .

[55]  M Brandt,et al.  Invited review: technical solutions for analysis of milk constituents and abnormal milk. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[56]  Xiangzheng Deng,et al.  Quantitative measurements of the interaction between net primary productivity and livestock production in Qinghai Province based on data fusion technique , 2017 .

[57]  Mirjam Holinger,et al.  Intake estimation in dairy cows fed roughage-based diets: An approach based on chewing behaviour measurements , 2016 .

[58]  Jarett P. Spinhirne,et al.  Sampling and analysis of volatile organic compounds in bovine breath by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[59]  M. Weisbjerg,et al.  Energy balance of individual cows can be estimated in real-time on farm using frequent liveweight measures even in the absence of body condition score. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[60]  J. Coetzee,et al.  Effect of Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia on behavior and physiologic responses of calves during high ambient environmental temperatures. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[61]  E. Davidson,et al.  Using model‐data fusion to interpret past trends, and quantify uncertainties in future projections, of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling , 2012 .

[62]  A Alempijevic,et al.  Live animal assessments of rump fat and muscle score in Angus cows and steers using 3-dimensional imaging. , 2017, Journal of animal science.

[63]  D W Pethick,et al.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry accurately predicts carcass composition from live sheep and chemical composition of live and dead sheep. , 2009, Meat science.

[64]  Luis Orlindo Tedeschi,et al.  A decision support system to improve individual cattle management. 1. A mechanistic, dynamic model for animal growth , 2004 .

[65]  J. Thompson,et al.  Video image analysis in the Australian meat industry - precision and accuracy of predicting lean meat yield in lamb carcasses. , 2004, Meat science.

[66]  L. Tedeschi,et al.  Using real-time ultrasound and carcass measurements to estimate total internal fat in beef cattle over different breed types and managements. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[67]  D. Stilmant,et al.  Effect of cattle diet and manure storage conditions on carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from tie-stall barns and stored solid manure , 2012 .

[68]  C J Rutten,et al.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[69]  G. Horn,et al.  Technical Note: Daily variation in intake of a salt-limited supplement by grazing steers , 2017 .

[70]  Leslie Overs,et al.  New ways of measuring intake, efficiency and behaviour of grazing livestock , 2014 .

[71]  H. Dove,et al.  Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants. , 2007 .

[72]  L. Tedeschi Integrating Genomics with Nutrition Models to Improve the Prediction of Cattle Performance and Carcass Composition under Feedlot Conditions , 2015, PloS one.

[73]  Dermot Diamond,et al.  Advances in wearable chemical sensor design for monitoring biological fluids , 2015 .

[74]  C. Pomar,et al.  Use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in non-ruminant nutrition research , 2017 .

[75]  E. Dwyer,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management—a review , 2016 .

[76]  A. Ausseil,et al.  Estimating pasture quality using Landsat ETM + : application for the greenhouse gas inventory of New Zealand , 2011 .

[77]  Luciano A. González,et al.  Development and application of a livestock phenomics platform to enhance productivity and efficiency at pasture , 2016 .

[78]  Rebecca N. Handcock,et al.  A pilot project combining multispectral proximal sensors and digital camerasfor monitoring tropical pastures , 2016 .