Selection priority for harvested trees according to stand structural indices

Abstract: The selection of trees to be harvested is a core tenet of uneven-aged forest management; however, few studies have focused on the process of tree selection. A set of stand structural parameters (uniform angle index, W; mingling index, M; dominance index, U) based on tree neighbor-spatial relationships, are particularly suitable for expressing the structural characteristics of forest stands. Such indices were used to parameterize thinning in three plots (a-c, each 100 × 100 m2) in a Korean pine broad-leaved forest in northeastern China and one plot (h, 70 × 70 m2) in a pine-oak mixed forest in northwest China. Low-intensity single-tree selection was applied according to the principles of structure-based forest management (SBFM), i.e., to promote high mixture, obvious size differentiation, and random pattern with the aim of improving the overall structure of the managed plots. A group of thinning priority indices (v_ij, k_ij and z_ij) were calculated according to the bivariate distributions of the structural characteristics of harvested trees and stands before harvest. Our results demonstrated that v_ij, k_ij and z_ij adequately describe the spatial relationship between each tree and its nearest neighbors, and their combinations can be efficiently used to set thinning priorities on harvested trees with different structural characteristics. Their application can reduce the subjectivity of the selection process and improve the speed and accuracy of the choice of trees to be harvested in uneven-aged mixed forests.

[1]  A. D’Amato,et al.  The influence of cutting cycle and stocking level on the structure and composition of managed old-growth northern hardwoods. , 2010 .

[2]  Lieven Nachtergale,et al.  Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis , 2003 .

[3]  K. Klepzig,et al.  The southern pine beetle prevention initiative: working for healthier forests , 2008 .

[4]  H. Mayer,et al.  Soluble N compound profiles and concentrations in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) are influenced by local climate and thinning , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[5]  J. R.,et al.  Quantitative analysis , 1892, Nature.

[6]  Thinning effect on light regime and growth of underplanted red oak and black cherry in post-agricultural forests of south-eastern Canada , 2012, New Forests.

[7]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Effects of uneven-aged silviculture on the stand structure, species composition, and economic returns of loblolly pine stands , 1998 .

[8]  M. Swaine,et al.  Effect of light on the germination of forest trees in Ghana , 1999 .

[9]  J. N. Long,et al.  A comprehensive framework of forest stand property–density relationships: perspectives for plant population ecology and forest management , 2014, Annals of Forest Science.

[10]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Thinning intensity and long-term changes in increment and stem form of Scots pine trees , 2004 .

[11]  Klaus Von Gadow,et al.  Modelling Forest Development , 1998, Forestry Sciences.

[12]  R. Bell,et al.  Overstorey and juvenile response to thinning and drought in a jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm.) forest of southwestern Australia , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[13]  Antti Penttinen,et al.  Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: An example from boreal spruce forest in southern Finland , 1996 .

[14]  J. Franklin,et al.  Natural Disturbance and Stand Development Principles for Ecological Forestry , 2015 .

[15]  The essential oil components of Cinnamomum cassia: an analysis under different thinning models of plantation Pinus massoniana , 2016, Journal of Forestry Research.

[16]  Yuichi Onda,et al.  Runoff responses to forest thinning at plot and catchment scales in a headwater catchment draining Japanese cypress forest , 2012 .

[17]  B. Wilson,et al.  Soil and vegetation response to thinning White Cypress Pine (Callitris glaucophylla) on the North Western Slopes of New South Wales, Australia , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[18]  A. Cutini,et al.  The influence of thinning on rainfall interception by Pinus pinea L. in Mediterranean coastal stands (Castel Fusano—Rome) , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[19]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[20]  Mykola Korol,et al.  Forest Structure and Diversity , 2012 .

[21]  Yuanfa Li,et al.  Spatial structure of timber harvested according to structure-based forest management , 2014 .

[22]  Yuanfa Li,et al.  Spatial structural characteristics of three hardwood species in Korean pine broad-leaved forest—Validating the bivariate distribution of structural parameters from the point of tree population , 2014 .

[23]  A. Newton,et al.  The influence of canopy gap size on natural regeneration of Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) in Bolivia. , 2000 .

[24]  Mark W. Schwartz,et al.  Rare Species and Ecosystem Functioning , 2005 .

[25]  R. Motta,et al.  Effects of forest management on ground beetle diversity in alpine beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands , 2014 .

[26]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Thinning intensity and growth of Scots pine stands in Finland , 2004 .

[27]  Yuanfa Li,et al.  The bivariate distribution characteristics of spatial structure in natural Korean pine broad-leaved forest , 2012 .

[28]  J. Henning,et al.  Understory light regimes following silvicultural treatments in central hardwood forests in Kentucky, USA , 2012 .

[29]  I. Cañellas,et al.  Thinning intensity and growth response in SW-European Scots pine stands , 2008, Annals of Forest Science.

[30]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Structural features of old-growth Australian montane ash forests. , 2000 .

[31]  A. Paletto,et al.  Stand structure indices as tools to support forest management: an application in Trentino forests (Italy) , 2018 .