Cardiac Biomarkers Are Associated With an Increased Risk of Stroke and Death in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) Substudy

Background— Cardiac biomarkers are strong predictors of adverse outcomes in several patient populations. We evaluated the prevalence of elevated troponin I and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and their association to cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial. Methods and Results— Biomarkers at randomization were analyzed in 6189 patients. Outcomes were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors and the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores. Patients were stratified based on troponin I concentrations: <0.010 &mgr;g/L, n=2663; 0.010 to 0.019 &mgr;g/L, n=2006; 0.020 to 0.039 &mgr;g/L, n=1023; ≥0.040 &mgr;g/L, n=497; and on NT-proBNP concentration quartiles: <387; 387 to 800; 801 to 1402; >1402 ng/L. Rates of stroke were independently related to levels of troponin I with 2.09%/year in the highest and 0.84%/year in the lowest troponin I group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.17–3.39]; P=0.0040), and to NT-proBNP with 2.30%/year versus 0.92% in the highest versus lowest NT-proBNP quartile groups, (HR, 2.40 [95% CI, 1.41–4.07]; P=0.0014). Vascular mortality was also independently related to biomarker levels with 6.56%/year in the highest and 1.04%/year the lowest troponin I group (HR, 4.38 [95% CI, 3.05–6.29]; P<0.0001), and 5.00%/year in the highest and 0.61%/year in the lowest NT-proBNP quartile groups (HR, 6.73 [3.95–11.49]; P<0.0001). Biomarkers increased the C-statistic from 0.68 to 0.72, P<0.0001, for a composite of thromboembolic events. Conclusions— Elevations of troponin I and NT-proBNP are common in patients with AF and independently related to increased risks of stroke and mortality. Cardiac biomarkers seem useful for improving risk prediction in AF beyond currently used clinical variables. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

[1]  Robby Nieuwlaat,et al.  Revised A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess one-year risk of major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: The Euro Heart Survey , 2012 .

[2]  A. Camm,et al.  Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2010, European heart journal.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[5]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  A sensitive cardiac troponin T assay in stable coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Richard A. Kronmal,et al.  N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Is a Major Predictor of the Development of Atrial Fibrillation: The Cardiovascular Health Study , 2009, Circulation.

[8]  G. Novo,et al.  Biomarkers in heart failure. , 2009, Frontiers in bioscience.

[9]  L. Lind,et al.  Prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in a population-based sample of elderly subjects. , 2008, European heart journal.

[10]  Anders Larsson,et al.  Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Michael J. Pencina,et al.  Comments on ‘Integrated discrimination and net reclassification improvements—Practical advice’ , 2008 .

[12]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  A. Maisel,et al.  State-of-the-Art PaperNatriuretic Peptides , 2007 .

[14]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Persistent Cardiac Troponin I Elevation in Stabilized Patients After an Episode of Acute Coronary Syndrome Predicts Long-Term Mortality , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  C. Phillips,et al.  Admission B-type natriuretic peptide levels and in-hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  M. Al-mallah,et al.  Predictors and outcomes associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes , 2007, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[17]  A. Rigby,et al.  The diagnostic utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for the detection of major structural heart disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2006, European heart journal.

[18]  J. Rehfeld,et al.  Atrial secretion of B-type natriuretic peptide. , 2006, European Heart Journal.

[19]  M. Hirai,et al.  Plasma atrial natriuretic Peptide and brain natriuretic Peptide levels after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  P. Venge,et al.  Troponin I as a Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease and Mortality in 70-Year-Old Men: A Community-Based Cohort Study , 2006, Circulation.

[21]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Narrative Review: Alternative Causes for Elevated Cardiac Troponin Levels when Acute Coronary Syndromes Are Excluded , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  L. Køber,et al.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in stable coronary heart disease. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  B. Wożakowska-Kapłon Effect of sinus rhythm restoration on plasma brain natriuretic peptide in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  A. Larsson,et al.  Biochemical indicators of cardiac and renal function in a healthy elderly population. , 2004, Clinical biochemistry.

[25]  Daniel Levy,et al.  Plasma natriuretic peptide levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and death. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Wu,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of the Roche NT-proBNP assay and comparison to the Biosite Triage BNP assay. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[27]  G. Fonarow,et al.  Cardiac Troponin I Is Associated With Impaired Hemodynamics, Progressive Left Ventricular Dysfunction, and Increased Mortality Rates in Advanced Heart Failure , 2003, Circulation.

[28]  R. Califf,et al.  N‐Terminal Pro‐Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Other Risk Markers for the Separate Prediction of Mortality and Subsequent Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Unstable Coronary Artery Disease: A Global Utilization of Strategies To Open occluded arteries (GUSTO)‐IV Substudy , 2003, Circulation.

[29]  R. Califf,et al.  Troponin and C-reactive protein have different relations to subsequent mortality and myocardial infarction after acute coronary syndrome: a GUSTO-IV substudy. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Pedro Lozano Natriuretic peptides. , 2020, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.

[31]  G. Lip,et al.  Plasma von Willebrand Factor and Soluble P-Selectin as Indices of Endothelial Damage and Platelet Activation in 1321 Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Relationship to Stroke Risk Factors , 2002, Circulation.

[32]  Douglas W Mahoney,et al.  Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  A. Wu,et al.  Multicenter Evaluation of an Automated Assay for Troponin I , 2022 .

[34]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Clinical performance of three cardiac troponin assays in patients with unstable coronary artery disease (a FRISC II substudy). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  Nader Rifai,et al.  Multimarker Approach to Risk Stratification in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Simultaneous Assessment of Troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide , 2002, Circulation.

[36]  M. Rich,et al.  Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. , 2001, JAMA.

[37]  M. Sabatine,et al.  The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  F. Boomsma,et al.  Plasma A- and B-type natriuretic peptides: physiology, methodology and clinical use. , 2001, Cardiovascular research.

[39]  D. Singer,et al.  Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. , 2001, JAMA.

[40]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  Y. Murakami,et al.  Atrium as a source of brain natriuretic polypeptide in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2000, Journal of cardiac failure.

[42]  Eorge,et al.  CARDIAC-SPECIFIC TROPONIN I LEVELS TO PREDICT THE RISK OF MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES , 2000 .

[43]  Transesophageal Echocardiographic Correlates of Thromboembolism in High-Risk Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  D. Fukai,et al.  Attenuation of compensation of endogenous cardiac natriuretic peptide system in chronic heart failure: prognostic role of plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration in patients with chronic symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. , 1997, Circulation.

[45]  D Wybenga,et al.  Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  K. Kugiyama,et al.  Localization and Mechanism of Secretion of B‐Type Natriuretic Peptide in Comparison With Those of A‐Type Natriuretic Peptide in Normal Subjects and Patients With Heart Failure , 1994, Circulation.

[47]  S. Hifumi,et al.  Prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 and thrombin-antithrombin III complex are useful markers of the hypercoagulable state in atrial fibrillation. , 1992, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[48]  P. Wolf,et al.  Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. , 1991, Stroke.

[49]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[50]  S. Shaughnessy,et al.  Do No Harm: Health Systems’ Duty to Promote Clinician Well-Being , 2022, American Journal of Hospital Medicine.