Phenomenological methodology for assessing the influence of flow conditions on the acoustic response of exhaust aftertreatment systems

Abstract The increasing limits of standards on aerosol and gaseous emissions from internal combustion engines have led to the progressive inclusion of different exhaust aftertreatment systems (EATS) as a part of the powertrain. Regulated emissions are generally abated making use of devices based on monolithic structures with different chemical functions. As a side effect, wave transmission across the device is affected and so is the boundary at the exhaust line inlet, so that the design of the latter is in turn affected. While some models are available for the prediction of these effects, the geometrical complexity of many devices makes still necessary in many cases to rely on experimental measurements, which cannot cover all the diversity of flow conditions under which these devices operate. To overcome this limitation, a phenomenological methodology is proposed in this work that allows for the sound extrapolation of experimental results to flow conditions different from those used in the measurements. The transfer matrix is obtained from tests in an impulse rig for different excitation amplitudes and mean flows. The experimental coefficients of the transmission matrix of the device are fitted to Fourier series. It allows treating the influence of the flow conditions on the acoustic response, which is manifested on changes in the characteristic periods, separately from the specific properties of every device. In order to provide predictive capabilities to the method, the Fourier series approach is coupled to a gas dynamics model able to account for the sensitivity of propagation velocity to variations in the flow conditions.

[1]  Francisco José Arnau,et al.  Time-domain computation of muffler frequency response: Comparison of different numerical schemes , 2007 .

[2]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[3]  Darius Mehta,et al.  Diesel Cold-Start Emission Control Research for 2015–2025 LEV III Emissions - Part 2 , 2013 .

[4]  Adam Kotrba,et al.  DPF Acoustic Performance: An Evaluation of Various Substrate Materials and Soot Conditions , 2011 .

[5]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Sound propagation in an array of narrow porous channels with application to diesel particulate filters , 2006 .

[6]  M. L. Munjal,et al.  Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers , 2014 .

[7]  Tamer Elnady,et al.  Simulation of diesel particulate filters in large exhaust systems , 2013 .

[8]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Simulation of the particle oxidation catalyst POC acoustics , 2014 .

[9]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[10]  Mats Åbom,et al.  Acoustic modelling and testing of diesel particulate filters , 2005 .

[11]  Panagiota Dilara,et al.  Cost effectiveness of particulate filter installation on Direct Injection Gasoline vehicles , 2013 .

[12]  Pedro Piqueras,et al.  Experimental assessment of pre-turbo aftertreatment configurations in a single stage turbocharged diesel engine. Part 1: Steady-state operation , 2015 .

[13]  Malcolm J. Crocker,et al.  Review of theoretical and experimental aspects of acoustical modeling of engine exhaust systems , 1994 .

[14]  John German,et al.  Estimated Cost of Emission Control Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles Part 1 - Gasoline , 2013 .

[15]  Yan-yan Zhan,et al.  Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , 1995 .

[16]  T. Johnson Review of Vehicular Emissions Trends , 2015 .

[17]  J. Desantes,et al.  ACOUSTIC BOUNDARY CONDITION FOR UNSTEADY ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW CALCULATIONS , 1995 .

[18]  G. F. Mucklow,et al.  Wave Action following Sudden Release of Compressed Gas from a Cylinder , 1948 .

[19]  Francisco José Arnau,et al.  A fluid dynamic model for unsteady compressible flow in wall-flow diesel particulate filters , 2011 .

[20]  Antonio J. Torregrosa,et al.  The 3Dcell Approach for the Acoustic Modeling of After-Treatment Devices , 2011 .

[21]  E. Dokumaci Sound transmission in narrow pipes with superimposed uniform mean flow and acoustic modelling of automobile catalytic converters , 1995 .

[22]  José Galindo,et al.  High-frequency response of a calculation methodology for gas dynamics based on Independent Time Discretisation , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[23]  Pedro Piqueras,et al.  Experimental and computational approach to the transient behaviour of wall-flow diesel particulate filters , 2017 .

[24]  T. Johnson Diesel Engine Emissions and Their Control , 2008 .

[25]  Byungchul Choi,et al.  De-NOx characteristics of a combined system of LNT and SCR catalysts according to hydrothermal aging and sulfur poisoning , 2011 .

[26]  Payri,et al.  Modified impulse method for the measurement of the frequency response of acoustic filters to weakly nonlinear transient excitations , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. M. Novak,et al.  Wave attenuation in catalytic converters: Reactive versus dissipative effects , 1998 .

[28]  K. S. Peat,et al.  A First Aproximation To The Effects Of Mean Flow On Sound Propagation Through Cylindrical Capillary Tubes , 1992 .

[29]  J. R. Serrano,et al.  Application of the two-step Lax and Wendroff FCT and the CE-SE method to flow transport in wall-flow monoliths , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[30]  R. J. Astley,et al.  WAVE PROPAGATION IN CATALYTIC CONVERTERS: FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM AND FINITE ELEMENT TO SOLUTION SCHEME , 1995 .

[31]  T. W. Wu,et al.  BEM Modeling of Mufflers with Diesel Particulate Filters and Catalytic Converters , 2009 .

[32]  Byungchul Choi,et al.  Effect of copper precursor on simultaneous removal of PM and NOx of a 2-way SCR/CDPF , 2016 .

[33]  Marco Antonio Luersen,et al.  Globalized Nelder-Mead method for engineering optimization , 2002 .