Geometry Aware NMPC Scheme for Morphing Quadrotor Navigation in Restricted Entrances

Geometry-morphing Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs) are gaining more and more attention lately, since their ability to modify their geometric morphology in-flight increases their versatility, while expanding their application range. In this novel research field, most of the works focus on the platform design and on the low-level control part for maintaining stability after the deformation. Nevertheless, another aspect of geometry morphing MAVs is the association of the deformation with respect to the shape and structure of the environment. In this article, we propose a novel Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) structure that modifies the morphology of a quadrotor based on the environmental entrances geometrical shape. The proposed method considers restricted entrances as a constraint in the NMPC and modifies the arm configuration of the MAV to provide a collision free path from the initial position to the desired goal, while passing through the entrance. To the authors’ best knowledge, this work is the first to connect the in-flight morphology with the characteristics of environmental shapes. Multiple simulation results depict the performance and efficiency of the proposed scheme in scenarios where the quadrotor is commanded to pass through restricted areas.

[1]  Manish Kumar,et al.  Flight Control of Sliding Arm Quadcopter with Dynamic Structural Parameters , 2020, ArXiv.

[2]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Cooperative coverage for surveillance of 3D structures , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[3]  Davide Scaramuzza,et al.  Geometry-aware Compensation Scheme for Morphing Drones , 2020, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[4]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Design, Modeling, and Control of an Aerial Robot DRAGON: A Dual-Rotor-Embedded Multilink Robot With the Ability of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Aerial Transformation , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[5]  Srikanth Gururajan,et al.  Evaluation of a Baseline Controller for Autonomous “Figure-8” Flights of a Morphing Geometry Quadcopter: Flight Performance , 2019, Drones.

[6]  George Nikolakopoulos,et al.  Deploying MAVs for autonomous navigation in dark underground mine environments , 2020, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  George Nikolakopoulos,et al.  Switching Model Predictive Control for Online Structural Reformations of a Foldable Quadrotor , 2020, IECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[8]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  GapFlyt: Active Vision Based Minimalist Structure-Less Gap Detection For Quadrotor Flight , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[9]  David Zarrouk,et al.  Flying STAR, a Hybrid Crawling and Flying Sprawl Tuned Robot , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[10]  Tufan Kumbasar,et al.  Design and development of FOLLY: A self-foldable and self-deployable quadcopter , 2020 .

[11]  Dario Floreano,et al.  The Foldable Drone: A Morphing Quadrotor That Can Squeeze and Fly , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[12]  T. Ushio,et al.  A Novel Quadcopter with A Tilting Frame using Parallel Link Mechanism , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[13]  Emil Fresk,et al.  Cooperative coverage path planning for visual inspection , 2018 .

[14]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Tree cavity inspection using aerial robots , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[15]  Mark W. Mueller,et al.  Design and Control of a Passively Morphing Quadcopter , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[16]  Goele Pipeleers,et al.  Embedded nonlinear model predictive control for obstacle avoidance using PANOC , 2018, 2018 European Control Conference (ECC).

[17]  Hriday Bavle,et al.  A Fully-Autonomous Aerial Robot for Search and Rescue Applications in Indoor Environments using Learning-Based Techniques , 2018, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[18]  Y. Bouzid,et al.  Design and Modeling of Unconventional Quadrotors , 2020, 2020 28th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED).

[19]  Valentin Riviere,et al.  Agile Robotic Fliers: A Morphing-Based Approach , 2018, Soft robotics.

[20]  Dimitris P. Tsakiris,et al.  Sfakiotakis, Michael and Chatzidaki, Avgousta and Evdaimon, Theodoros and Kazakidi, Asimina and Tsakiris, Dimitris P. (2016) Effects of compliance in pedundulatory locomotion over granular substrates. In: 2016 24th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), , 2018 .

[21]  Sina Sharif Mansouri,et al.  Non-linear MPC based Navigation for Micro Aerial Vehicles in Constrained Environments , 2020, 2020 European Control Conference (ECC).

[22]  Pakpong Chirarattananon,et al.  A Quadrotor With an Origami-Inspired Protective Mechanism , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[23]  George Nikolakopoulos,et al.  Subterranean MAV Navigation based on Nonlinear MPC with Collision Avoidance Constraints , 2020, IFAC-PapersOnLine.