Measuring online information seeking context, Part 2: Findings and discussion

Context is one of the most important concepts in information seeking and retrieval research. However, the challenges of studying context are great; thus, it is more common for researchers to use context as a post hoc explanatory factor, rather than as a concept that drives inquiry. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for collecting data about information seeking context in natural online environments, and identify which aspects of context should be considered when studying online information seeking. The study is reported in two parts. In this, the second part, results and implications of this research are presented. Part 1 (Kelly, 2006) discussed previous literature on information seeking context and behavior, situated the current study within this literature, and described the naturalistic, longitudinal research design that was used to examine and measure the online information seeking context of seven users during a 14-week period. Results provide support for the value of the method in studying online information seeking context, the relative importance of various measures of context, how these measures change over time, and, finally, the relationship between these measures. In particular, results demonstrate significant differences in distributions of usefulness ratings according to task and topic. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[2]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[3]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  The Stratified Model of Information Retrieval Interaction: Extension and Applications , 1997 .

[4]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task complexity, problem structure and information actions - Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Information needs: a person-in-situation approach , 1997 .

[8]  Diane Kelly.  Measuring online information seeking context, Part 1: Background and method , 2006 .

[9]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  A User-Centered Approach to Evaluating Topic Models , 2004, ECIR.

[10]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[11]  Colleen Cool.  The Concept of Situation in Information Science. , 2001 .

[12]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Seeking Meaning: a process approach to library and information services" Ablex Publishing , 2003 .

[13]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Issues of context in information retrieval (IR): an introduction to the special issue , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Information seeking and mediated searching: Part 2. Uncertainty and its correlates , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 3. Successive searching , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Diane Kelly,et al.  The effects of topic familiarity on information search behavior , 2002, JCDL '02.

[17]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Medical students' personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving , 1995 .

[18]  A. Schutz.  The Structures of the Life World , 1973 .