GNC of the SphereX Robot for Extreme Environment Exploration on Mars

Wheeled ground robots are limited from exploring extreme environments such as caves, lava tubes and skylights. Small robots that can utilize unconventional mobility through hopping, flying or rolling can overcome these limitations. Mul-tiple robots operating as a team offer significant benefits over a single large ro-bot, as they are not prone to single-point failure, enable distributed command and control and enable execution of tasks in parallel. These robots can complement large rovers and landers, helping to explore inaccessible sites, obtaining samples and for planning future exploration missions. Our robots, the SphereX, are 3-kg in mass, spherical and contain computers equivalent to current smartphones. They contain an array of guidance, navigation and control sensors and electronics. SphereX contains room for a 1-kg science payload, including for sample return. Our work in this field has recognized the need for miniaturized chemical mobility systems that provide power and propulsion. Our research explored the use of miniature rockets, including solid rockets, bi-propellants including RP1/hydrogen-peroxide and polyurethane/ammonium-perchlorate. These propulsion options provide maximum flight times of 10 minutes on Mars. Flying, especially hovering consumes significant fuel; hence, we have been developing our robots to perform ballistic hops that enable the robots to travel efficiently over long distances. Techniques are being developed to enable mid-course correction during a ballistic hop. Using multiple cameras, it is possible to reconstitute an image scene from motion blur. Hence our approach is to enable photo mapping as the robots travel on a ballistic hop. The same images would also be used for navigation and path planning. Using our proposed design approach, we are developing low-cost methods for surface exploration of planetary bodies using a network of small robots.

[1]  M. Malin,et al.  Evidence for recent groundwater seepage and surface runoff on Mars. , 2000, Science.

[2]  E. Robens,et al.  Study on the Possible Existence of Water on the Moon , 2009 .

[3]  Jekan Thangavelautham,et al.  On the Catalytic Degradation in Fuel Cell Power Supplies for Long‐Life Mobile Field Sensors , 2013 .

[4]  J. Balaram,et al.  Rotorcrafts for Mars Exploration , 2014 .

[5]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  David Wettergreen,et al.  Real‐Time SLAM with Octree Evidence Grids for Exploration in Underwater Tunnels , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[7]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Distributed Coverage Control for Mobile Anisotropic Sensor Networks , 2013 .

[8]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Through the eyes of a bird: modelling visually guided obstacle flight , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  M. Pavone,et al.  Spacecraft/rover hybrids for the exploration of small Solar System bodies , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[10]  Goran Jurisa Basic Power-scavenging Tumbleweed Rover , 2010 .

[11]  Steven Dubowsky Jean-Sébastien Low Cost Micro Exploration Robots for Search and Rescue in Rough Terrain , 2006 .

[12]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  Robot Mobility Systems for Planetary Surface Exploration - State-of-the-Art and Future Outlook: A Literature Survey , 2010 .

[13]  Abhilash Pandya,et al.  A Review of Active Mechanical Driving Principles of Spherical Robots , 2012, Robotics.

[14]  Henry S. Wright,et al.  Liquid Rocket Propulsion for Atmospheric Flight in the Proposed ARES Mars Scout Mission , 2004 .

[15]  Jae Hyun Lee,et al.  Mechanism, control, and visual management of a jumping robot , 2008 .

[16]  Lovell Lawrence A LIQUID‐PROPELLANT ROCKET MOTOR.* , 2009 .

[17]  Jeffrey Antol,et al.  A New Vehicle for Planetary Surface Exploration: The Mars Tumbleweed , 2005 .

[18]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[19]  John Lygouras,et al.  Robot Path Generation by Viewing a Static Scene from a Single Camera , 2002 .

[20]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  Jean-Sébastien Plante,et al.  Mobility and Power Feasibility of a Microbot Team System for Extraterrestrial Cave Exploration , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Steven Dubowsky,et al.  A Concept Mission: Microbots for Large‐Scale Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration , 2005 .

[23]  On the origin of lunar sinuous rilles , 1969 .

[24]  Mei Yi Cheung,et al.  Lithium hydride powered PEM fuel cells for long-duration small mobile robotic missions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[25]  Jekan Thangavelautham,et al.  Spherical planetary robot for rugged terrain traversal , 2017, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[26]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Analysis of actuation and dynamic balancing for a single-wheel robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[27]  William Whittaker,et al.  Comparative evaluation of range sensing technologies for underground void modeling , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[28]  Serge Caron,et al.  A Spherical Robot for Planetary Surface Exploration , 2001 .

[30]  Hagen Schempf,et al.  Cyclops: miniature robotic reconnaissance system , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[31]  A. Alasty,et al.  Satellite attitude control using three reaction wheels , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[32]  Christopher Batten,et al.  Kickbot : A Spherical Autonomous Robot , 2008 .

[33]  Jekanthan Thangavelautham,et al.  Flying, Hopping Pit-Bots for Cave and Lava Tube Exploration on the Moon and Mars , 2017, ArXiv.

[34]  Steven Dubowsky,et al.  A passive lithium hydride based hydrogen generator for low power fuel cells for long-duration sensor networks , 2014 .