Advanced Factor Analysis on Pittsburgh Particle Size-Distribution Data Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program

Positive matrix factorization (PMF) method was applied to particle size-distribution data acquired during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) from July 2001 to August 2001. After removing those days with nucleation events, a total of 1632 samples, each with 165 evenly-sized intervals from 0.003 to 2.5 μm, were obtained from scanning mobility particle spectrometer (SMPS) and aerodynamic particle sampler (APS). The temporal resolution was 15 min. The values for each set of five consecutive-size bins were averaged to produce 33 new size channels. The size distributions of particle number as well as volume were analyzed with a bilinear model. Three kinds of information were used to identify the sources: the number and volume size distributions associated with the factors, the time frequency properties of the contribution of each source (Fourier analysis of source contribution values) and the correlations of the contribution values with the gas-phase data and some composition data. Through these analyses, the sources were assigned as sparse nucleation, local traffic, stationary combustion, grown particles and remote traffic, and secondary aerosol in a sequence of decreasing number concentration contributions. Conditional probability function (CPF) analysis was performed for each source so as to ascertain the likely directions in which the sources were located.

[1]  Andrey Khlystov,et al.  Nucleation Events During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Description and Relation to Key Meteorological, Gas Phase, and Aerosol Parameters Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[2]  C. Stanier,et al.  An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distributions Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[3]  Andrey Khlystov,et al.  Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) , 2004 .

[4]  P. Hopke,et al.  Analysis of ambient particle size distributions using Unmix and positive matrix factorization. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  P. Paatero,et al.  Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic models , 2002 .

[6]  S. Solberg,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2002 .

[7]  P. Hopke,et al.  Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: chemical composition and sources. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Concentrations of ultrafine, fine and PM2.5 particles in three European cities , 2001 .

[9]  Finn Palmgren,et al.  Experimental studies of ultrafine particles in streets and the relationship to traffic , 2001 .

[10]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Identification of Sources of Phoenix Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  D Mark,et al.  Characterization of Particles from a Current Technology Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine , 2000 .

[12]  P. Paatero,et al.  Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and suburban residential areas in Thailand by positive matrix factorization , 2000 .

[13]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  The modality of particle size distributions of environmental aerosols , 1999 .

[14]  T. Bond,et al.  Climate-Relevant Particulate Emission Characteristics of a Coal Fired Heating Plant , 1999 .

[15]  P. Paatero,et al.  Application of positive matrix factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong , 1999 .

[16]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Identification of Source Nature and Seasonal Variations of Arctic Aerosol byPositive Matrix Factorization , 1999 .

[17]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of aerosols in a subtropical urban atmosphere : Particle size distribution and correlation with gaseous pollutants , 1998 .

[18]  P. Paatero.  Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis , 1997 .

[19]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[20]  Samuel S. M. Wong.  Computational methods in physics and engineering (2nd ed.) , 1997 .

[21]  G. Harris,et al.  1. Aerosol emissions measured with a laser optical particle counter , 1996 .

[22]  E. Kauppinen,et al.  22.O.04 Coal combustion aerosol particle size distribution determination using low-pressure impactor and CCSEM methods , 1994 .

[23]  G. Reischl.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosols by the Differential Mobility Analyzer Method: Concepts and Realization Criteria for the Size Range Between 2 and 500 nm , 1991 .

[24]  Willy Z. Sadeh,et al.  A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at grand Canyon national park , 1985 .

[25]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Multielemental characterization of urban roadway dust , 1980 .