Increasing LPWAN Scalability by Means of Concurrent Multiband IoT Technologies: An Industry 4.0 Use Case

One of the most important challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the next years will be the smooth incorporation of millions of smart devices into its communications paradigm. The greater coverage area of sub-1-GHz low-power wide area networks (LPWANs) makes them a suitable technology to easily encompass hundreds of end devices under a single base station. However, LPWAN inherent simplicity affects negatively on scalability, as these networks are not flexible enough to deal with a high number of nodes unless their traffic load is really low, which limits many potential use-cases. This paper analyzes the scalability issue in LPWAN and proposes the INTER-HARE protocol: a solution based on the use of concurrent multiband IoT technologies, where an 868-MHz LPWAN acts as transparent backhaul for a set of subnetworks working at 2.4 GHz. The implementation of the INTER-HARE protocol on a real IoT platform was assessed both in several laboratory testbeds and in a pilot developed in the premises of an industrial company, proving its suitability in non-delay sensitive monitoring applications with end devices scattered throughout the targeted area.

[1]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Multi-radio medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2010, Int. J. Sens. Networks.

[2]  Milica Pejanovic,et al.  Range Extension in IEEE 802.11ah Systems Through Relaying , 2017, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[3]  Brendan O'Flynn,et al.  Multiradio, multiboot capable sensing systems for home area networking , 2016 .

[4]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  HARE: Supporting Efficient Uplink Multi-Hop Communications in Self-Organizing LPWANs , 2017, Sensors.

[5]  Konstantin Mikhaylov,et al.  Method of Assigning Spreading Factor to Improve the Scalability of the LoRaWan Wide Area Network , 2018, 2018 10th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT).

[6]  Kevin Klues,et al.  Opal: A Multiradio Platform for High Throughput Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Embedded Systems Letters.

[7]  David Boyle,et al.  A Novel and Miniaturized 433/868MHz Multi-band Wireless Sensor Platform for Body Sensor Network Applications , 2012, 2012 Ninth International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks.

[8]  Adam Dunkels,et al.  Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors , 2004, 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[9]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the scalability of uncoordinated multiple access for the Internet of Things , 2017, 2017 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[10]  Fernando R. Mazarrón,et al.  Study of the Vertical Distribution of Air Temperature in Warehouses , 2014 .

[11]  Jaume Barceló,et al.  IEEE 802.11AH: the WiFi approach for M2M communications , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[12]  Claire Goursaud,et al.  Dedicated networks for IoT : PHY / MAC state of the art and challenges , 2015, IOT 2015.

[13]  Yun Yang,et al.  Dual-Band Sensor Network for Accurate Device-Free Localization in Indoor Environment with WiFi Interference , 2015, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Towards Energy Efficient Design of Multi-radio Platforms for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ipsn 2008).

[15]  Francesco Sottile,et al.  Cognitive-based multi-radio prototype for industrial environment , 2018, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[16]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Sub-GHz LPWAN Network Coexistence, Management and Virtualization: An Overview and Open Research Challenges , 2017, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[17]  Evgeny M. Khorov,et al.  A survey on IEEE 802.11ah: An enabling networking technology for smart cities , 2015, Comput. Commun..

[18]  Glenn Ergeerts,et al.  Survey of the DASH7 Alliance Protocol for 433 MHz Wireless Sensor Communication , 2013, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[19]  Utz Roedig,et al.  Do LoRa Low-Power Wide-Area Networks Scale? , 2016, MSWiM.

[20]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  Multi-hop communication in the uplink for LPWANs , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Mahbubur Rahman,et al.  Integrating Low-Power Wide-Area Networks in White Spaces , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM Third International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI).

[22]  Michael Brünig,et al.  Radio diversity for reliable communication in WSNs , 2011, Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[23]  Mahesh Sooriyabandara,et al.  Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[24]  Adam Dunkels.  Rime - a lightweight layered communication stack for sensor networks. , 2007 .

[25]  Jacques Bughin,et al.  The internet of things: mapping the value beyond the hype , 2015 .

[26]  Hiroyuki Morikawa,et al.  Multi-Hop LoRa Networks Enabled by Concurrent Transmission , 2017, IEEE Access.

[27]  Utz Roedig,et al.  LoRa for the Internet of Things , 2016, EWSN.

[28]  Cristina Cano,et al.  Low energy operation in WSNs: A survey of preamble sampling MAC protocols , 2011, Comput. Networks.

[29]  Liviu-Octavian Varga.  Multi-hop Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks : routing and low duty-cycle link layer. (Réseaux de capteurs sans fils multi-sauts à récupération d'énergie : routage et couche liaison de bas rapport cyclique) , 2015 .

[30]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.