Slope angle estimation method based on sparse subspace clustering for probe safe landing

To avoid planetary probes landing on steep slopes where they may slip or tip over, a new method of slope angle estimation based on sparse subspace clustering is proposed to improve accuracy. First, a coordinate system is defined and established to describe the measured data of light detection and ranging (LIDAR). Second, this data is processed and expressed with a sparse representation. Third, on this basis, the data is made to cluster to determine which subspace it belongs to. Fourth, eliminating outliers in subspace, the correct data points are used for the fitting planes. Finally, the vectors normal to the planes are obtained using the plane model, and the angle between the normal vectors is obtained through calculation. Based on the geometric relationship, this angle is equal in value to the slope angle. The proposed method was tested in a series of experiments. The experimental results show that this method can effectively estimate the slope angle, can overcome the influence of noise and obtain an exact slope angle. Compared with other methods, this method can minimize the measuring errors and further improve the estimation accuracy of the slope angle.

[1]  Wioleta Błaszczak-Bąk,et al.  The OptD-multi method in LiDAR processing , 2017 .

[2]  Hedieh Sajedi,et al.  A novel clustering algorithm based on data transformation approaches , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Hai-Ying Shan,et al.  The spectral characterization of butterfly-like graphs , 2017 .

[4]  Kerry McGuire,et al.  Developing Decision Aids to Enable Human Spaceflight Autonomy , 2016, AI Mag..

[5]  Shiji Song,et al.  Robust K-Median and K-Means Clustering Algorithms for Incomplete Data , 2016 .

[6]  Jing Liu,et al.  LIDAR obstacle warning and avoidance system for unmanned aerial vehicle sense-and-avoid , 2016 .

[7]  Michèle Lavagna,et al.  A multilayer perceptron hazard detector for vision-based autonomous planetary landing , 2016 .

[8]  Erwin Mooij,et al.  A stereo-vision hazard-detection algorithm to increase planetary lander autonomy , 2016 .

[9]  Ting Tao,et al.  Innovative hazard detection and avoidance guidance for safe lunar landing , 2016 .

[10]  Hutao Cui,et al.  Robust hazard matching approach for visual navigation application in planetary landing , 2015 .

[11]  Hutao Cui,et al.  Robust plane fitting algorithm for landing hazard detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  J. Biele,et al.  Rosetta Lander – Philae: Landing preparations☆ , 2015 .

[13]  M. Watkins,et al.  Selection of the Mars Science Laboratory Landing Site , 2012 .

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[15]  Zhang Gong-ping An algorithm of terrain hazard assessment for planetary soft landing , 2011 .

[16]  Jean-Emmanuel Deschaud,et al.  A Fast and Accurate Plane Detection Algorithm for Large Noisy Point Clouds Using Filtered Normals and Voxel Growing , 2010 .

[17]  Li Shuang,et al.  Autonomous navigation and guidance scheme for precise and safe planetary landing , 2009 .

[18]  Liu Liangdong A LIDAR-Based Autonomous Landing Site Selection Method for Pinpoint Lunar Soft Landing , 2009 .

[19]  Yang Qin-ke Researches on DEM Derived Slope: A Review and Prospective , 2007 .

[20]  Andrew E. Johnson,et al.  Lidar-Based Hazard Avoidance for Safe Landing on Mars , 2002 .

[21]  Edoardo Amaldi,et al.  On the Approximability of Minimizing Nonzero Variables or Unsatisfied Relations in Linear Systems , 1998, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[22]  M. Hestenes Multiplier and gradient methods , 1969 .