Validation of a novel endoscopic program for measuring the size of gastrointestinal lesions

BackgroundValid and reliable methods for measurement of lesion sizes during endoscopy have not been established.MethodsWe developed a novel software program (ENDOVER; Poinbionics, Seoul, Republic of Korea) to measure lesions sizes and assessed its validity and reliability. To validate the program, we measured standard coin sizes and estimated measurement errors. To assess program reliability, 32 pictures of endoscopically resected specimens were used to measure tissue sizes six times in a 24-h interval by two examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreements. Agreement between the program and pathological measurements was assessed by absolute differences.ResultsThe nominal standard sizes of 10-won, 100-won, and 500-won coins were 18.0, 24.0, and 26.5 mm, and the calculated sizes were 18.09, 24.48, and 26.31 mm, respectively. ICCs of the long and short diameters were, respectively, 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–0.95] and 0.93 (CI 0.89–0.96) for examiner 1 and 0.88 (CI 0.81–0.93) and 0.92 (CI 0.87–0.95) for examiner 2. Interobserver ICCs of the long and short diameters were 0.97 (CI 0.94–0.99) and 0.97 (CI 0.94–0.99), respectively. The mean absolute differences between the program and pathological measurements were 4.4 and 4.7 mm for the long and short diameters, respectively.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that the novel measurement program is a valid and reliable method for estimation of lesion sizes from endoscopic findings during and after examination.

[1]  Toshiyuki Matsui,et al.  A new stereoscopic endoscopy system: accurate 3-dimensional measurement in vitro and in vivo with distortion-correction function. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  W. Smith,et al.  Endoscopic measurement of lesion size: improved accuracy with image processing. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  D. Park,et al.  Lymph node metastasis from intestinal-type early gastric cancer: experience in a single institution and reassessment of the extended criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  Li Lu,et al.  Reliability analysis: Calculate and Compare Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) in SAS , 2007 .

[5]  G. Lee,et al.  Degree of Healing and Healing-Associated Factors of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Induced Ulcers After Pantoprazole Therapy for 4 Weeks , 2009, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[6]  Shinji Tanaka,et al.  Calibration of a 3D endoscopic system based on active stereo method for shape measurement of biological tissues and specimen , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  M. Choi,et al.  Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer With Submucosal Invasion: Analysis of a Single Institutional Experience , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[8]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  How reliable is determination of ulcer size by endoscopy? , 1979, British medical journal.

[9]  M. Classen,et al.  A new method for the endoscopic determination of gastrointestinal ulcer area. , 1981, Endoscopy.

[10]  J. Waye,et al.  Colon Polypectomy: A Review of Routine and Advanced Techniques , 2013, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[11]  G. Lee,et al.  Endoscopic and oncologic outcomes after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: 1370 cases of absolute and extended indications. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  K. Devarajan,et al.  Endoscopic imaging and size estimation of colorectal adenomas in the multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.