Cycloid vs. harmonic drives for use in high ratio, single stage robotic transmissions

Harmonic and cycloid drives are both compact, high ratio transmissions appropriate for use in anthropomorphic robots, although cycloid drives are rarely used in the field. This paper describes the design parameters for cycloid drives and shows the results of six cycloid models designed to match corresponding harmonic drives. Cycloid drive models were compared with manufacturing data from corresponding harmonic drives with respect to maximum gear ratio, transmission thickness, efficiency, backlash/gear ratio ripple, and reflected inertia. Cycloid drive designs were found to be thinner, more efficient, and to have lower reflected inertia than corresponding harmonic drives. However, the cycloid designs had larger gear ratio ripple and substantial backlash, and they could not meet the maximum gear ratio provided by the corresponding harmonic drives in two out of six models for equal applied torques. Two cycloid drives were manufactured to confirm efficiency predictions and demonstrated moderate to high efficiency across a range of output torques. Cycloid drives should be considered for robotic and prosthetic applications where smaller thickness/higher efficiency requirements dominate over low backlash/gear ratio ripple considerations.

[1]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[2]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Unified Approach to Cycloid Drive Profile, Stress, and Efficiency Optimization , 2010 .

[3]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  User-Modulated Impedance Control of a Prosthetic Elbow in Unconstrained, Perturbed Motion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Timothy D. Tuttle,et al.  Understanding and Modeling the Behavior of a Harmonic Drive Gear Transmission , 1992 .

[5]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS) , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Thomas H. Massie,et al.  The PHANToM Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects , 1994 .

[7]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  Improved torque fidelity in harmonic drive sensors through the union of two existing strategies , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[8]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Development of 4-DOF manipulator using mechanical impedance adjuster , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Joong-Ho Shin,et al.  On the lobe profile design in a cycloid reducer using instant velocity center , 2006 .

[10]  Daniel C. H. Yang,et al.  Design and application guidelines for cycloid drives with machining tolerances , 1990 .

[11]  Richard F. ff. Weir,et al.  CHAPTER 32 DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL ARMS AND HANDS FOR PROSTHETIC APPLICATIONS , 2005 .

[12]  Hamid D. Taghirad,et al.  Modeling and Parameter Identification of Harmonic Drive Systems , 1998 .

[13]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  A New Cycloid Drive With High-Load Capacity and High Efficiency , 2004 .

[14]  Ta-Shi Lai,et al.  Geometric design of roller drives with cylindrical meshing elements , 2005 .

[15]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Soft robotics , 2008, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[16]  Ian W. Hunter,et al.  A comparative analysis of actuator technologies for robotics , 1992 .