Mapping the flow of information within the putative mirror neuron system during gesture observation

The putative mirror neuron system may either function as a strict feed-forward system or as a dynamic control system. A strict feed-forward system would predict that action observation leads to a predominantly temporal→parietal→premotor flow of information in which a visual representation is transformed into motor-programs which contribute to action understanding. Instead, a dynamic feedback control system would predict that the reverse direction of information flow predominates because of a combination of inhibitory forward and excitatory inverse models. Here we test which of these conflicting predictions best matches the information flow within the putative mirror neuron system (pMNS) and between the pMNS and the rest of the brain during the observation of comparatively long naturalistic stretches of communicative gestures. We used Granger causality to test the dominant direction of influence. Our results fit the predictions of the dynamic feedback control system: we found predominantly an information flow within the pMNS from premotor to parietal and middle temporal cortices. This is more pronounced during an active guessing task than while passively reviewing the same gestures. In particular, the ventral premotor cortex sends significantly more information to other pMNS areas than it receives during active guessing than during passive observation.

[1]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Jean Decety,et al.  When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[8]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[10]  Marleen B. Schippers,et al.  Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  What activates the human mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: Bottom-up visual features or top-down intentions? , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  Kiyotaka Nemoto,et al.  The neural network for the mirror system and mentalizing in normally developed children: an fMRI study , 2004, Neuroreport.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI Adaptation Reveals Mirror Neurons in Human Inferior Parietal Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[16]  D I Perrett,et al.  Motion sensitive cells in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area. I. Lack of response to the sight of the animal's own limb movement. , 1993, Experimental brain research.

[17]  R. Schubotz Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  C. Keysers,et al.  Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Playing Charades in the fMRI: Are Mirror and/or Mentalizing Areas Involved in Gestural Communication? , 2009, PloS one.

[20]  D. Perrett,et al.  Motion sensitive cells in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area: response discrimination between self-generated and externally generated pattern motion , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Alexander Kraskov,et al.  Corticospinal Neurons in Macaque Ventral Premotor Cortex with Mirror Properties: A Potential Mechanism for Action Suppression? , 2009, Neuron.

[24]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  I Know What You Are Doing A Neurophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[26]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  C. Keysers,et al.  Empathy and the Somatotopic Auditory Mirror System in Humans , 2006, Current Biology.

[30]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Inferior frontal gyrus activity triggers anterior insula response to emotional facial expressions. , 2008, Emotion.

[31]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience: where are we heading? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  End or Means—The “What” and “How” of Observed Intentional Actions , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[37]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[38]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  C. Heyes,et al.  What Is the Significance of Imitation in Animals , 2000 .

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. , 2007, Neuroreport.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[43]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Mirror neurons , 2009, Current Biology.

[44]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  R. Miall,et al.  Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. , 2003, Neuroreport.

[46]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[47]  Ayse Pinar Saygin,et al.  Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[49]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[50]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Joint Action, Interactive Alignment, and Dialog , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[51]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Infants predict other people's action goals , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[53]  G. Csibra,et al.  'Obsessed with goals': functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[54]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[55]  Claus Lamm,et al.  Predicting the actions of others taps into one's own somatosensory representations—A functional MRI study , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Somatosensation in social perception , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[57]  B. Puri,et al.  The human mirror system: A motor resonance theory of mind-reading , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[58]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging , 1998, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.

[59]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  The effect of intra- and inter-subject variability of hemodynamic responses on group level Granger causality analyses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[60]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.