Magnetic levitation pump versus constrained vortex pump: a pilot study on the hemolysis effect during minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Santarpino,et al. Air, inflammation and biocompatibility of the extracorporeal circuits , 2020, Perfusion.
[2] M. Thuong,et al. Hemolysis and Plasma Free Hemoglobin During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: From Clinical Implications to Laboratory Details , 2020, ASAIO journal.
[3] F. Bartolomucci,et al. Fibonacci's Golden Ratio-An Innovative Approach to the Design and Management of Extra-Corporeal Circulation. , 2019, Surgical technology international.
[4] A. Moritz,et al. Prospective, Randomized Un-Blinded Three Arm Controlled Study in Coronary Artery Revascularization with Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Systems (MiECC): Surrogate Parameter Analysis of Biocompatibility. , 2018, The heart surgery forum.
[5] T. Carrel,et al. Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation should become the standard practice in coronary revascularization surgery. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[6] J. Schaarschmidt,et al. Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.
[7] G. Schears,et al. Using Daily Plasma-Free Hemoglobin Levels for Diagnosis of Critical Pump Thrombus in Patients Undergoing ECMO or VAD Support. , 2015, The journal of extra-corporeal technology.
[8] C. Thuys,et al. A comparison study of haemolysis production in three contemporary centrifugal pumps , 2014, Perfusion.
[9] Hilde van der Togt,et al. Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..