Measuring the effect of fuel treatments on forest carbon using landscape risk analysis

Abstract. Wildfire simulation modelling was used to examine whether fuel reduction treatments can potentially reduce future wildfire emissions and provide carbon benefits. In contrast to previous reports, the current study modelled landscape scale effects of fuel treatments on fire spread and intensity, and used a probabilistic framework to quantify wildfire effects on carbon pools to account for stochastic wildfire occurrence. The study area was a 68 474 ha watershed located on the Fremont-Winema National Forest in southeastern Oregon, USA. Fuel reduction treatments were simulated on 10% of the watershed (19% of federal forestland). We simulated 30 000 wildfires with random ignition locations under both treated and untreated landscapes to estimate the change in burn probability by flame length class resulting from the treatments. Carbon loss functions were then calculated with the Forest Vegetation Simulator for each stand in the study area to quantify change in carbon as a function of flame length. We then calculated the expected change in carbon from a random ignition and wildfire as the sum of the product of the carbon loss and the burn probabilities by flame length class. The expected carbon difference between the non-treatment and treatment scenarios was then calculated to quantify the effect of fuel treatments. Overall, the results show that the carbon loss from implementing fuel reduction treatments exceeded the expected carbon benefit associated with lowered burn probabilities and reduced fire severity on the treated landscape. Thus, fuel management activities resulted in an expected net loss of carbon immediately after treatment. However, the findings represent a point in time estimate (wildfire immediately after treatments), and a temporal analysis with a probabilistic framework used here is needed to model carbon dynamics over the life cycle of the fuel treatments. Of particular importance is the long-term balance between emissions from the decay of dead trees killed by fire and carbon sequestration by forest regeneration following wildfire.

[1]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires , 2005 .

[2]  Soung-Ryoul Ryu,et al.  Simulating Fire Spread with Landscape Management Scenarios , 2006, Forest Science.

[3]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest , 2005 .

[4]  G. Richards.  An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution , 1990 .

[5]  R. Alig,et al.  Public land, timber harvests, and climate mitigation: Quantifying carbon sequestration potential on U.S. public timberlands , 2008 .

[6]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  Effect of Fuel Treatments on Fuels and Potential Fire Behavior in California, USA, National Forests , 2009 .

[7]  S. Stephens,et al.  Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[9]  R. Neilson,et al.  Climate Change Effects on Vegetation Distribution and Carbon Budget in the United States , 2001, Ecosystems.

[10]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Implementation of National Fire Plan treatments near the wildland–urban interface in the western United States , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Z. Gedalof,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC, CLIMATIC, AND ECOLOGICAL CONTROLS ON EXTREME WILDFIRE YEARS IN THE NORTHWESTERN UNITED STATES , 2005 .

[12]  Patricia L. Andrews,et al.  Fuels Management-How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings , 2006 .

[13]  Thomas T. Veblen,et al.  Forest fuel mapping and evaluation of LANDFIRE fuel maps in Boulder County, Colorado, USA. , 2009 .

[14]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure , 2010 .

[15]  A. Finkral,et al.  The effects of a thinning treatment on carbon stocks in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest , 2008 .

[16]  Coeli M. Hoover,et al.  The Kane Experimental Forest carbon inventory: Carbon reporting with FVS , 2008 .

[17]  Malcolm P. North,et al.  Fuel treatment effects on tree‐based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios , 2009 .

[18]  David L. Martell,et al.  A simulation model of the growth and suppression of large forest fires in Ontario , 2007 .

[19]  Yohay Carmel,et al.  Assessing fire risk using Monte Carlo simulations of fire spread , 2009 .

[20]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Use of artificial landscapes to isolate controls on burn probability , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[22]  John R. Coleman,et al.  A Fire Perimeter Expansion Algorithm-Based on Huygens Wavelet Propagation , 1993 .

[23]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl , 2007 .

[24]  Tim Sexton.  U.S. Federal Fuel Management Programs: Reducing Risk to Communities and Increasing Ecosystem Resilience and Sustainability , 2006 .

[25]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. , 2000 .

[26]  M. Finney.  Fire growth using minimum travel time methods , 2002 .

[27]  George W. Koch,et al.  Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: toward a full accounting of forest carbon offsets , 2008 .

[28]  H. Safford,et al.  Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity in an area of wildland-urban interface, Angora Fire, Lake Tahoe Basin, California , 2009 .

[29]  M. Rollins.  LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment , 2009 .

[30]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Modeling fire in semi-desert grassland/oak woodland: the spatial implications , 2002 .

[31]  M. Finney.  Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[32]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area , 2009, Ecosystems.

[33]  M. Finney.  An Overview of FlamMap Fire Modeling Capabilities , 2006 .

[34]  C. Skinner,et al.  Probability of tree survival after wildfire in an interior pine forest of northern California: Effects of thinning and prescribed fire , 2007 .

[35]  M. Hurteau,et al.  Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[36]  Janet L. Ohmann,et al.  Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest- neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, U.S.A. , 2002 .

[37]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  An overview of the fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator , 2000 .

[38]  Linda S. Heath,et al.  A model of forest floor carbon mass for United States forest types , 2002 .

[39]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  First Order Fire Effects Model: FOFEM 4.0, user's guide , 1997 .

[40]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires , 2006 .

[41]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Climatic Change, Wildfire, and Conservation , 2004 .

[42]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments , 2005 .

[43]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire , 2005 .

[44]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  A strategic assessment of forest biomass and fuel reduction treatments in western states , 2003 .

[45]  Jan W. Van Wagtendonk,et al.  Use of a Deterministic Fire Growth Model to Test Fuel Treatments , 1996 .

[46]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Wildfire risk in the wildland―urban interface: A simulation study in northwestern Wisconsin , 2009 .

[47]  M. Finney.  FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[48]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[49]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Application of wildfire simulation models for risk analysis , 2009 .

[50]  G. E. Dixon.  Essential FVS: A User's Guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator , 2007 .

[51]  M. Finney,et al.  Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA , 2007 .

[52]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States , 2008 .

[53]  E. A. Catchpole,et al.  Modelling the spread of grass fires , 1982, The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics.

[54]  Lisa M. Holsinger,et al.  Effects of fuel treatments on carbon-disturbance relationships in forests of the northern Rocky Mountains § , 2010 .

[55]  Pierpaolo Duce,et al.  Evaluation of FARSITE simulator in Mediterranean maquis , 2007 .