The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle

BackgroundMethane represents 16 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. It has been estimated that ruminant livestock produce ca. 29 % of this methane. As individual animals produce consistently different quantities of methane, understanding the basis for these differences may lead to new opportunities for mitigating ruminal methane emissions. Metagenomics is a powerful new tool for understanding the composition and function of complex microbial communities. Here we have applied metagenomics to the rumen microbial community to identify differences in the microbiota and metagenome that lead to high- and low-methane-emitting cattle phenotypes.MethodsFour pairs of beef cattle were selected for extreme high and low methane emissions from 72 animals, matched for breed (Aberdeen-Angus or Limousin cross) and diet (high or medium concentrate). Community analysis was carried out by qPCR of 16S and 18S rRNA genes and by alignment of Illumina HiSeq reads to the GREENGENES database. Total genomic reads were aligned to the KEGG genes databasefor functional analysis.ResultsDeep sequencing produced on average 11.3 Gb per sample. 16S rRNA gene abundances indicated that archaea, predominantly Methanobrevibacter, were 2.5× more numerous (P = 0.026) in high emitters, whereas among bacteria Proteobacteria, predominantly Succinivibrionaceae, were 4-fold less abundant (2.7 vs. 11.2 %; P = 0.002). KEGG analysis revealed that archaeal genes leading directly or indirectly to methane production were 2.7-fold more abundant in high emitters. Genes less abundant in high emitters included acetate kinase, electron transport complex proteins RnfC and RnfD and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase. Sequence data were assembled de novo and over 1.5 million proteins were annotated on the subsequent metagenome scaffolds. Less than half of the predicted genes matched matched a domain within Pfam. Amongst 2774 identified proteins of the 20 KEGG orthologues that correlated with methane emissions, only 16 showed 100 % identity with a publicly available protein sequence.ConclusionsThe abundance of archaeal genes in ruminal digesta correlated strongly with differing methane emissions from individual animals, a finding useful for genetic screening purposes. Lower emissions were accompanied by higher Succinovibrionaceae abundance and changes in acetate and hydrogen production leading to less methanogenesis, as similarly postulated for Australian macropods. Large numbers of predicted protein sequences differed between high- and low-methane-emitting cattle. Ninety-nine percent were unknown, indicating a fertile area for future exploitation.

[1]  A. Chao Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population , 1984 .

[2]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Hydrogen and methane emissions from beef cattle and their rumen microbial community vary with diet, time after feeding and genotype , 2014, British Journal of Nutrition.

[3]  J.-F. Cheng,et al.  Adaptation to herbivory by the Tammar wallaby includes bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles different from other herbivores , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  P. Hobson,et al.  Microbial ecology and activities in the rumen: Part II. , 1982, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[5]  P. Golyshin,et al.  Aberystwyth University Isolation and characterization of novel lipases/esterases from a bovine rumen metagenome , 2015 .

[6]  R. E. Hungate Hydrogen as an intermediate in the rumen fermentation , 2004, Archiv für Mikrobiologie.

[7]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep. , 2003, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[8]  S. Tringe,et al.  Metagenomic Discovery of Biomass-Degrading Genes and Genomes from Cow Rumen , 2011, Science.

[9]  P. Janssen Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics , 2010 .

[10]  A. Spang,et al.  Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen , 2013, Nature Communications.

[11]  S. Tringe,et al.  Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae Implicated in Low Methane Emissions from Tammar Wallabies , 2011, Science.

[12]  J. Goopy,et al.  Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[13]  N. Boon,et al.  Methanotrophic archaea possessing diverging methane-oxidizing and electron-transporting pathways , 2013, The ISME Journal.

[14]  J. Padmanabha,et al.  Functional Gene Analysis Suggests Different Acetogen Populations in the Bovine Rumen and Tammar Wallaby Forestomach , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  Shengguo Zhao,et al.  Isolation and biochemical characterization of two lipases from a metagenomic library of China Holstein cow rumen. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[16]  C. Martin,et al.  Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[17]  R. Prins,et al.  Regulation of rumen lactate metabolism and the role of lactic acid in nutritional disorders of ruminants , 1978, Veterinary Science Communications.

[18]  L. Guan,et al.  Assessment of the Microbial Ecology of Ruminal Methanogens in Cattle with Different Feed Efficiencies , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  Anne-Kristin Kaster,et al.  Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[20]  R. Thauer Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson. 1998 Marjory Stephenson Prize Lecture. , 1998, Microbiology.

[21]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Russell,et al.  The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  G. Matrone,et al.  Sulfate reduction by a Desulfovibrio species isolated from sheep rumen. , 1974, Applied microbiology.

[25]  K. Timmis,et al.  Novel Polyphenol Oxidase Mined from a Metagenome Expression Library of Bovine Rumen , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  D. Kell,et al.  The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes—KEGG , 2000, Yeast.

[27]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Archaeal abundance in post-mortem ruminal digesta may help predict methane emissions from beef cattle , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Catherine L Drennan,et al.  A Ni-Fe-Cu Center in a Bifunctional Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase/ Acetyl-CoA Synthase , 2002, Science.

[29]  C. Horn,et al.  The potential of Megasphaera elsdenii isolates to control ruminal acidosis , 2010 .

[30]  C. Joshi,et al.  Metagenomic analysis of virulence-associated and antibiotic resistance genes of microbes in rumen of Indian buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). , 2012, Gene.

[31]  Peter Schönhei Chapter 4 Bioenergetics and transport in methanogens and related thermophilic archaea , 1993 .

[32]  E. Jackson,et al.  The analysis of agricultural materials: a manual of the analytical methods used by the Agricultural Development and Advisory Service. , 1986 .

[33]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  Desulfovibrio of the sheep rumen , 1976, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[34]  K. Nelson,et al.  Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  S. Ragsdale,et al.  Enzymology of the acetyl-CoA pathway of CO2 fixation. , 1991, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[36]  Biochemical and kinetic characterization of the multifunctional β-glucosidase/β-xylosidase/α-arabinosidase, Bgxa1 , 2014, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[37]  J. Clemente,et al.  Simultaneous Amplicon Sequencing to Explore Co-Occurrence Patterns of Bacterial, Archaeal and Eukaryotic Microorganisms in Rumen Microbial Communities , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  Florent E. Angly,et al.  Phage-bacteria relationships and CRISPR elements revealed by a metagenomic survey of the rumen microbiome. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[39]  Wen-Han Yu,et al.  Pyramidobacter piscolens gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the phylum 'Synergistetes' isolated from the human oral cavity. , 2009, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[40]  O. Neijssel,et al.  The energetics of bacterial growth: a reassessment , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[41]  Peter H. Janssen,et al.  Structure of the Archaeal Community of the Rumen , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[42]  Torsten Seemann,et al.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation , 2014, Bioinform..

[43]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[44]  L. Bodrossy,et al.  Molecular Ecology Techniques for the Study of Aerobic Methanotrophs , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[45]  F. Nakazawa,et al.  Description of Mogibacterium pumilum gen. nov., sp. nov. and Mogibacterium vescum gen. nov., sp. nov., and reclassification of Eubacterium timidum (Holdeman et al. 1980) as Mogibacterium timidum gen. nov., comb. nov. , 2000, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[46]  G. Holtrop,et al.  Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii , 2008, British Journal of Nutrition.

[47]  C. Creevey,et al.  Metasecretome-selective phage display approach for mining the functional potential of a rumen microbial community , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[48]  D. Morgavi,et al.  Effect of fibre- and starch-rich finishing diets on methanogenic Archaea diversity and activity in t , 2011 .

[49]  K. Bernard,et al.  Dialister micraerophilus sp. nov. and Dialister propionicifaciens sp. nov., isolated from human clinical samples. , 2005, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[50]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. , 2009, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[51]  R M Murray,et al.  Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep , 1976, British Journal of Nutrition.

[52]  Michael E Goddard,et al.  The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[53]  D. Lloyd,et al.  Hydrogenosomes in known species of rumen entodiniomorphid protozoa , 1984 .

[54]  Hideaki Tanaka,et al.  MetaVelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads , 2011, BCB '11.

[55]  Lei Chang,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of Two β-Glucosidase/Xylosidase Enzymes from Yak Rumen Metagenome , 2011, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[56]  Dongwan D. Kang,et al.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome , 2014, Genome research.

[57]  B. Hayes,et al.  Investigating the effect of two methane-mitigating diets on the rumen microbiome using massively parallel sequencing. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[58]  L. Guan,et al.  Characterization of Variation in Rumen Methanogenic Communities under Different Dietary and Host Feed Efficiency Conditions, as Determined by PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Analysis , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[59]  J. Russell,et al.  The role of pH in regulating ruminal methane and ammonia production. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[60]  Mick Watson,et al.  Meta4: a web application for sharing and annotating metagenomic gene predictions using web services , 2013, Front. Genet..

[61]  C. Martin,et al.  Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[62]  M. P. Bryant,et al.  The rumen bacteria , 1997 .

[63]  J. Kemp,et al.  Characterisation of Two Bifunctional Cellulase–Xylanase Enzymes Isolated from a Bovine Rumen Metagenome Library , 2013, Current Microbiology.

[64]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[65]  Siva Ganesh,et al.  Two Different Bacterial Community Types Are Linked with the Low-Methane Emission Trait in Sheep , 2014, PloS one.

[66]  William J. Kelly,et al.  The Genome Sequence of the Rumen Methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium Reveals New Possibilities for Controlling Ruminant Methane Emissions , 2010, PloS one.

[67]  K. Timmis,et al.  Novel hydrolase diversity retrieved from a metagenome library of bovine rumen microflora. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[68]  S. Wiedemann,et al.  Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review , 2011 .