How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites

Purpose This study aims to predict the intention to participate (ITP) in public activities by utilizing five levels of e-participation reported in the literature. The study used the levels of e-informing, e-consulting, e-involving, e-collaborating and e-empowering as predictors of the intention to participate in e-government services. Design/methodology/approach An empirical test was adopted using a survey to measure the five levels of e-participation and the dependent variable, ITP in e-government initiatives. The survey included items from previous studies translated to Arabic. Subjects responded to a five-point Likert scale to measure their perceptions regarding the sub-dimensions of each e-participation level. Statistical analyses of the collected data were conducted to test the assumed hypotheses. Multiple regression of the five predictor levels was conducted to predict the ITP in e-government services. Findings All the estimated means of e-participation levels were moderately perceived. The regression results indicated a significant prediction of three levels: e-informing, e-consulting and e-empowering. The other two levels (e-involving and e-collaborating) failed to predict the ITP. The coefficient of determination R2 resulting from the regression test was significant at the 0.001 level, which explained 61.9 per cent of the variance in the dependent variable. Research limitations/implications The instrument used is a newly developed one in Arabic language, which might have influenced the results. The distinction between e-involving and e-collaborating might not have been recognized by subjects, which might have increased the limitations of the study. The results of this study call for more research to validate the instrument and try to see if new statements of e-consulting and e-involving might be employed. The other side could be to reduce the levels to three levels only or merge the insignificant ones into one (four levels only). Practical implications Governments need to assert the role of citizens in the decision-making process. Such assertion is done through the e-participation process. Social implications Jordanians perceive the e-informing and e-consulting levels to be a foundation that can be easily attained, but jumping to the e-empowering level means that the society is keen on the partnership with the government. Originality/value This study is the first to use the participation levels (five levels) as predictors of the ITP. Most studies have utilized theories such as technology acceptance model (TAM), theory of reseaoned action (TRA) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and other technology adoption theories. Also, this research has established ground for an Arabic survey to measure such levels, regardless of their prediction or description purpose.

[1]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[2]  Richard W. Brislin,et al.  Comparative Research Methodology: Cross-Cultural Studies , 1976 .

[3]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  E-democracy and knowledge: A multicriteria framework for the new democratic era , 2003 .

[5]  Subhajit Basu,et al.  E‐government and developing countries: an overview , 2004 .

[6]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[7]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[8]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  A New Agenda for e-Democracy , 2005 .

[9]  Maria Wimmer,et al.  Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre , 2007, ICEGOV '07.

[10]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[11]  M. Islam Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model , 2008 .

[12]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A survey of e-participation research projects in the European Union , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[13]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives , 2008, CACM.

[15]  Junseok Hwang,et al.  Approaching e-Democracy: A Case Study Analysis from Jordan , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology.

[16]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Transforming E-government and E-participation through IT , 2009, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[17]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  E-VOTING SYSTEMS: A TOOL FOR E-DEMOCRACY , 2010 .

[18]  Øystein Sæbø,et al.  Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Impact of National Culture on E-Government Development: A Global Study , 2011, Internet Res..

[20]  Shiva Kolachalam An Overview of e-Government , 2012 .

[21]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Designing E-Government Services: Key Service Attributes and Citizens’ Preference Structures , 2012 .

[22]  Gustav Lidén Is e-democracy more than democratic? : An examination of the implementation of socially sustainable values in an e-Democratic processes , 2012 .

[23]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011) , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Peter Woods,et al.  Predictors for E-government Adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an Empirical Evaluation Based on a Citizen-centric Approach , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[25]  Steve Drew,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of E-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia: Obstacles and Challenges , 2012 .

[26]  Jooho Lee,et al.  E‐Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government , 2012 .

[27]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  Digital Government Adoption in Jordan: An Environmental Model , 2012, Int. Arab. J. e Technol..

[28]  L. Teixeira,et al.  E-participation in Portugal: evaluation of government electronic platforms , 2012 .

[29]  P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan,et al.  Citizen participation and effectiveness of e‐petition: Sutharyakeralam – India , 2012 .

[30]  Yousra Harb,et al.  E–government as an anti–corruption tool: citizens perceptions , 2013 .

[31]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  E-Government and Social Media Sites: The Role and Impact , 2013 .

[32]  D. Norris,et al.  e-participation in local governments: an empirical examination of impacts , 2013, DG.O.

[33]  Yan,et al.  Online Government Services: The Benefits for Operations of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses in Quebec , 2013 .

[34]  Mary J. Newhart,et al.  Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository , 2013 .

[35]  Dimitris Gouscos,et al.  eParticipation in the EU , 2013 .

[36]  Hussain Alenezi,et al.  Investigating the strategic relationship between information quality and e-government benefits , 2013 .

[37]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  E-PARTICIPATION LEVELS AND TECHNOLOGIES , 2013 .

[38]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Designing Public Participation Processes , 2015 .

[39]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  Active Citizen E-Participation in Local Governance: Do Individual Social Capital and E-Participation Management Matter? , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[41]  E. Abu-Shanab Antecedents of trust in e-government services: an empirical test in Jordan: , 2014 .

[42]  Nalin Asanka Gamagedara Arachchilage,et al.  A Critical Review of Theories and Models of Technology Adoption and Acceptance in Information System Research , 2015, Int. J. Technol. Diffusion.

[43]  Ali Tarhini,et al.  Development of quantitative model to investigate the strategic relationship between information quality and e-government benefits , 2015 .

[44]  Lloyd George Waller,et al.  Barriers to transforming government in Jamaica , 2015 .

[45]  A. A. A. R. A. Athmay,et al.  Demographic factors as determinants of e-governance adoption: A field study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) , 2015 .

[46]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..