Biological black water treatment combined with membrane separation.

Separate treatment of black (toilet) water offers the possibility to recover energy and nutrients. In this study three combinations of biological treatment and membrane filtration were compared for their biological and membrane performance and nutrient conservation: a UASB followed by effluent membrane filtration, an anaerobic MBR and an aerobic MBR. Methane production in the anaerobic systems was lower than expected. Sludge production was highest in the aerobic MBR, followed by the anaerobic MBR and the UASB-membrane system. The level of nutrient conservation in the effluent was high in all three treatment systems, which is beneficial for their recovery from the effluent. Membrane treatment guaranteed an effluent which is free of suspended and colloidal matter. However, the concentration of soluble COD in the effluent still was relatively high and this may seriously hamper subsequent nutrient recovery by physical-chemical processes. The membrane filtration behaviour of the three systems was very different, and seemed to be dominated by the concentration of colloidals in the membrane feed. In general, membrane fouling was the lowest in the aerobic MBR, followed by the membranes used for UASB effluent filtration and the anaerobic MBR.

[1]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[2]  G Zeeman,et al.  Performance of UASB septic tank for treatment of concentrated black water within DESAR concept. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  D. Jeison,et al.  Cake layer formation in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[4]  I. Steen,et al.  Why Recover Phosphorus for Recycling, and How? , 1999 .

[5]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[6]  Alain Grasmick,et al.  Hydrodynamic control of bioparticle deposition in a MBR applied to wastewater treatment , 1998 .

[7]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications , 2004 .

[8]  H. Siegrist,et al.  Prediction of recycle phosphorus loads from anaerobic digestion , 1997 .

[9]  G Zeeman,et al.  Anaerobic biodegradability and digestion in accumulation systems for concentrated black water and kitchen organic-wastes. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[11]  Walter Lorch,et al.  Handbook of water purification , 1981 .

[12]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[13]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors: Applications and Research Directions , 2006 .