Using interactive management to facilitate a student-centred conceptualisation of critical thinking: a case study

Critical thinking (CT) is a metacognitive process, consisting of a number of sub-skills and dispositions, that, when used appropriately, increases the chances of producing a logical solution to a problem or a valid conclusion to an argument. CT has been identified as a fundamental learning objective of third-level education; however, students often report not being given the opportunity to adequately understand and cultivate CT skills. Though most CT interventions are designed based on academic or expert definitions of CT skills, students are rarely, if ever, asked to guide their instruction by describing their perspectives on what constitutes CT. The current case study investigated students’ conceptualisations of what constitutes good CT using a collective intelligence methodology, interactive management. Interactive management (IM) is a computer-assisted process that allows a group to build a structural model describing relations between elements in a system. Though decades of research on group decision-making in educational and social psychology highlight the many limitations associated with group problem solving (e.g. as a result of an over-reliance on heuristics, cognitive biases and ‘groupthink’), a fundamental skill for making decisions and solving problems is the ability to collectively visualise the structure of a shared problem, and use this knowledge to design solutions and strategies for collective action. Results of IM group work from the current case study revealed five core CT skills (clarity of expression, conversational skill, inference, evaluation, and explanation), five CT dispositions (detachment, listening, systematicity, recognising uncertainty, and self-questioning) and fourteen structural relationships among them. The ability to detach, listen and engage in conversation with others, were seen as fundamental drivers of all other competencies in the system. Results are discussed in light of research and theory on CT and best practice for CT instruction.

[1]  Tanja Engelmann,et al.  THE ADDED VALUE OF COMMUNICATION IN A CSCL-SCENARIO COMPARED TO JUST HAVING ACCESS TO THE PARTNERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION , 2010 .

[2]  T. Gelder,et al.  Learning to Reason: A Reason!-Able Approach. , 2000 .

[3]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR TRIBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE MODEL FOR CONSENSUS BUILDING , 1991 .

[4]  Luc T Le,et al.  Graduate Skills Assessment : Stage One Validity Study , 2002 .

[5]  R. Gagne.  Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[6]  Margaret Lloyd,et al.  Thinking critically about critical thinking in higher education , 2010 .

[7]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[8]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  Guidelines For Computer-Assisted Group Problem Solving , 1992 .

[9]  Michael Hogan,et al.  The promotion of critical thinking skills through argument mapping , 2011 .

[10]  Ian Stewart,et al.  An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments , 2012, Metacognition and Learning.

[11]  W. Ashby,et al.  Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems , 1991 .

[12]  Lawrence R. Frey,et al.  Innovations in group facilitation : applications in natural settings , 1995 .

[13]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[14]  Alexander N. Christakis,et al.  Correspondence: Systems profiles , 1987 .

[15]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[16]  Vaiva Rimiene,et al.  Assessing and Developing Students' Critical Thinking , 2002 .

[17]  C. Argyris.  Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational , 1982 .

[18]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Motivation, emotion, and cognition: integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development , 2004 .

[20]  V. Feeg,et al.  Forum on the future of pediatric nursing: looking toward the 21st century. , 1988, Pediatric nursing.

[21]  Garth Boomer,et al.  Negotiating the Curriculum. , 1978 .

[22]  B. Rogoff.  Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[23]  Cromer Il,et al.  Forum on the future of pediatric nursing: looking toward the 21st century. , 1988 .

[24]  K. Fischer.  A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. , 1980 .

[25]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Australian Education Review, No. 43. , 1999 .

[26]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[27]  Christopher P. Dwyer,et al.  An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century , 2014 .

[28]  Juliane Freud,et al.  Thought And Knowledge An Introduction To Critical Thinking , 2016 .

[29]  David R. Fordham,et al.  Critical thinking in the public accounting profession: aptitudes and attitudes , 1998 .

[30]  R. Alfaro-LeFevre.  Critical thinking. , 1997, Nursing spectrum.

[31]  S. Mehra,et al.  The decision makers. , 1979, New internationalist.

[32]  R. H. Eniss.  A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities , 1987 .

[33]  D. Kuhn.  A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[34]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to Group Problem Solving , 1995 .

[35]  Joan Boykoff Baron,et al.  Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice , 1986 .

[36]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. , 1970 .

[37]  J. Flavell.  Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[38]  Jeffrey D. Kromrey,et al.  Teaching Critical Thinking in a Community College History Course: Empirical Evidence from Infusing Paul's Model , 2001 .

[39]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[40]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[41]  John N. Warfield,et al.  A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity Through Systems Design , 1994 .

[42]  Benjamin J. Broome.  Collective Design of the Future: Structural Analysis of Tribal Vision Statements , 1995 .

[43]  William I. Gorden.  Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life , 1984 .

[44]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[45]  P Haggard,et al.  The psychology of action. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[46]  A. Fisher,et al.  Critical Thinking : What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World , 2007 .

[47]  Robert H. Ennis.  Is Critical Thinking Culturally Biased , 1998 .

[48]  Christopher P. Dwyer,et al.  Metacognitive Skill Development and Applied Systems Science: A Framework of Metacognitive Skills, Self-regulatory Functions and Real-World Applications , 2015 .

[49]  Richard M. Lerner,et al.  Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, Vol. 1, 6th ed. , 2006 .

[50]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned For , 1981 .

[51]  James C. Hershauer.  The New Science of Management Decision , 1978 .

[52]  Tim van Gelder.  How To Improve Critical Thinking Using Educational Technology. , 2001 .

[53]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[54]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Personal Epistemology The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing , 2002 .

[55]  D. Perkins,et al.  Good thinking… , 2004, Nursery World.

[56]  D. Bohm.  A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. , 1986 .

[57]  D. Alan Bensley.  Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Unified Skills Approach , 1997 .

[58]  Christopher P. Dwyer,et al.  The Evaluation of Argument Mapping as a Learning Tool , 2011 .

[59]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher , 1994 .

[60]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories , 1997 .

[61]  Mary Brabeck.  The Relationship between Critical Thinking Skills and Development of Reflective Judgment among Adolescent and Adult Women. , 1981 .

[62]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[63]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  The impact of the social sciences , 1966 .

[64]  L. Resnick.  The Nature of Intelligence , 2024 .

[65]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments , 1997 .

[66]  Kelly Y.L. Ku,et al.  Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance , 2010 .

[67]  Owen Harney,et al.  Collaborative learning: the effects of trust and open and closed dynamics on consensus and efficacy , 2012, Social Psychology of Education.

[68]  E. Glaser.  An Experiment in Development of Critical Thinking , 1942 .

[69]  John Bigelow,et al.  Improving critical thinking using web based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback , 2009 .

[70]  R. R. Allen.  A TAXONOMY OF CONCEPTS AND CRITICAL ABILITIES RELATED TO THE EVALUATION OF VERBAL ARGUMENTS. , 1967 .

[71]  John N. Warfield,et al.  A Handbook of Interactive Management , 1994 .

[72]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[73]  Garth Boomer,et al.  Negotiating the Curriculum: Educating For The 21st Century , 1992 .

[74]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[75]  T. Solon,et al.  Generic Critical Thinking Infusion and Course Content Learning in Introductory Psychology. , 2007 .

[76]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[77]  Dermot F. Donnelly,et al.  ‘Just Be Quiet and Listen to Exactly What He's Saying': Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms , 2014 .

[78]  R. Heller.  The Decision Makers , 1989 .

[79]  Michael Hogan,et al.  Against didacticism: A psychologist's view , 2006 .

[80]  D. Halpern.  Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[81]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[82]  Kelly Y. L. Ku,et al.  Assessing Students' Critical Thinking Performance: Urging for Measurements Using Multi-Response Format. , 2009 .

[83]  Wilder D. Bancroft,et al.  How to think about… , 1928, New Scientist.

[84]  Richard D. Roberts,et al.  Is Intelligence Critical Thinking? Why We Need a New Definition of Intelligence , 2007 .

[85]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  How digital concept maps about the collaborators’ knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..