Investigating Technology Concepts to Support Rohingya Refugees in Malaysia

The Rohingya ethnic group is one of the most persecuted minorities, whose specific circumstances pose unique and interesting challenges. The digital revolution is transforming the world and is leaving refugees behind (UNHCR). In this paper, we present a multiphase user centred approach we used to explore how Rohingya refugees could access assistance by utilizing technology they already have or share; both early on and long after they arrived in a new country. The findings we present from phase 1, which was an early participatory design phase, were confirmed and endorsed by the Rohingya community, UNHCR and local charities during phase 3. These findings, suggest that concepts aiming to assist Rohingya refugees should primarily focus on: safety, social capital, upskilling, and language translation. Finally, we present the iterative user centred design, implementation, and evaluation of one of these concepts focusing on safety, before being deployed within the Rohingya community in Malaysia.

[1]  N. Endut,et al.  Resilience, smartphone use and language among urban refugees in the Global south , 2021, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.

[2]  M. Wood,et al.  Primary Crime Prevention Apps: A Typology and Scoping Review , 2021, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[3]  Melati Nungsari,et al.  Poverty and precarious employment: the case of Rohingya refugee construction workers in Peninsular Malaysia , 2020 .

[4]  Mohd Safwan Ghazali,et al.  Developing a Demographic, Human Capital Values and Economic Profiling of Rohingya Refugees Workers in Malaysia , 2020 .

[5]  A. Alencar.  Mobile communication and refugees: An analytical review of academic literature , 2020, Sociology Compass.

[6]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Using Cultural Probes in HCI4D/ICTD: A Design Case Study from Bungoma, Kenya , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  J. Skues,et al.  A Content Analysis of Personal Safety Apps: Are They Keeping Us Safe or Making Us More Vulnerable? , 2020, Violence against women.

[8]  P. Sakdapolrak,et al.  Forced Migration in Southeast Asia: A Brief Overview of Current Research , 2019 .

[9]  T. Mancini,et al.  The opportunities and risks of mobile phones for refugees’ experience: A scoping review , 2019, PloS one.

[10]  M. Wood,et al.  Viral justice? Online justice-seeking, intimate partner violence and affective contagion , 2019 .

[11]  Yasmin Salim.  LIVELIHOOD SUSTAINABILITY AMONG ROHINGYA REFUGEES: A CASE STUDY IN TAMAN SENANGIN, SEBERANG PERAI, PENANG , 2019, Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences.

[12]  Jera Lego.  Making Refugees (Dis)Appear: Identifying Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand and Malaysia , 2018 .

[13]  J. Read,et al.  Enlisting friends to reduce sexual victimization risk: There's an app for that… but nobody uses it , 2018, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[14]  Jaz Hee-jeong Choi,et al.  Refugee and the post-trauma journeys in the fuzzy front end of co-creative practices , 2018, PDC.

[15]  H. Legido-Quigley,et al.  The health needs and access barriers among refugees and asylum-seekers in Malaysia: a qualitative study , 2018, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[16]  Kevin Revier.  “Now you’re connected”: Carceral visuality and police power on MobilePatrol , 2018, Theoretical Criminology.

[17]  Carleen F. Maitland,et al.  Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Digital Connectivity in Marginalized Communities , 2018, Computer.

[18]  A. Hasinoff,et al.  Rape: is there an app for that? An empirical analysis of the features of anti-rape apps , 2017 .

[19]  Negin Dahya,et al.  Tracing pathways to higher education for refugees: the role of virtual support networks and mobile phones for women in refugee camps , 2017 .

[20]  K. Smets.  The way Syrian refugees in Turkey use media: Understanding “connected refugees” through a non-media-centric and local approach , 2017 .

[21]  Charity Chao Mbogo,et al.  Beyond “yesterday’s tomorrow”: future-focused mobile interaction design by and for emergent users , 2017, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  Mangai Natarajan,et al.  Police Response to Domestic Violence: A Case Study of TecSOS Mobile Phone Use in the London Metropolitan Police Service , 2016 .

[23]  G. Mascheroni,et al.  Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: Opportunities, constraints, and emotions , 2016 .

[24]  M. Paret,et al.  Precarity and agency through a migration lens , 2016 .

[25]  Vered Slonim-Nevo,et al.  Risk Factors Associated with Culture Shock among Asylum Seekers from Darfur , 2016 .

[26]  Michael S. Daubs,et al.  App-centric mobile media and commoditization: Implications for the future of the open Web , 2016 .

[27]  William D. Tucker,et al.  The ethical limits of bungee research in ICTD , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS).

[28]  Carl-Ulrik Schierup,et al.  Migration, Precarization and the Democratic Deficit in Global Governance , 2015 .

[29]  Borja Martinović,et al.  Return Wishes of Refugees in the Netherlands: The Role of Integration, Host National Identification and Perceived Discrimination , 2015 .

[30]  I. Maas,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Interethnic Contacts in Germany: Estimates from a Multilevel Growth Curve Model , 2015 .

[31]  Kalpana Viswanath,et al.  SafetiPin: an innovative mobile app to collect data on women's safety in Indian cities , 2015 .

[32]  Daniel Trottier,et al.  Crowdsourcing CCTV surveillance on the Internet , 2014 .

[33]  Cameron Tonkinwise,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism , 2014 .

[34]  Susan Banki.  Precarity of Place: a complement to the growing precariat literature , 2013 .

[35]  M. Lindsay,et al.  Survivor Feedback on a Safety Decision Aid Smartphone Application for College-Age Women in Abusive Relationships , 2013 .

[36]  Torin Monahan,et al.  Crowdsourcing urban surveillance: The development of homeland security markets for environmental sensor networks , 2013 .

[37]  Burkhard Schafer.  Crowdsourcing and cloudsourcing CCTV surveillance , 2013, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[38]  R. Sanyal.  Refugees and the City: An Urban Discussion , 2012 .

[39]  Henrique Santos,et al.  Open Government and Citizen Participation in Law Enforcement via Crowd Mapping , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[40]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial Computing , 2012 .

[41]  Marcos De Oliveira,et al.  Collective intelligence in law enforcement - The WikiCrimes system , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[42]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[43]  Sjaak Kroon,et al.  Perceived discrimination and acculturation among Iranian refugees in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[44]  Gary Marsden,et al.  People are people, but technology is not technology , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  Randall D. Spain,et al.  Measurement Invariance of the Nasa TLX , 2008 .

[46]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[48]  David Isaacs,et al.  The World Café: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter , 2005 .

[49]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[50]  Janet Taylor.  Refugees and social exclusion: What the literature says , 2004 .

[51]  Jacob Buur,et al.  The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design , 2002, TCHI.

[52]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[53]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .