Enabling design characteristics and budget usefulness

This study aims to investigate the influence of budgeting design characteristics on perceived budgeting usefulness, based on the enabling-coercive framework.,This paper develops a survey in one large publicly-listed Brazilian company that operates in the electric utility industry. The sample comprises 75 middle managers from different areas of this organization. This study uses structural equation modeling as the data analysis method.,The results indicate that internal and global transparencies determine middle managers’ perceptions of budgeting usefulness, while no relationship was found for repair capacity and flexibility characteristics. This paper shows that managers, when provided with global and internal transparencies and independently of their level discretion regarding target revisions or the reallocation of resources, perceive budgeting systems as being useful for decision-facilitating and decision-influencing roles.,The findings might be relevant for budgeting professionals to review or design the budgeting system in terms of dribbling potential flaws and increasing its use in the organization.,The study explores the multidimensionality of the enabling-coercive budgeting design construct. This study provides a theoretical contribution to the literature by showing that budget alignment, integration, learning and information sharing are relevant such that an organization could improve the assertiveness using budgeting systems. Besides, this paper provides an opposing view about the supposed relation between flexible budgeting design and budgeting usefulness. Frequently, some management directions are offered by the literature and no guarantee is provided in terms of the connection between the adoption and the usefulness of those mechanisms. Therefore, the findings shed more light on the practical developments in budgeting.

[1]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development , 2016 .

[2]  Martin Messner,et al.  Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators , 2012 .

[3]  Paula van Veen-Dirks.  Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers , 2010 .

[4]  Stephen C. Hansen,et al.  Multiple facets of budgeting: an exploratory analysis , 2004 .

[5]  Anna Rohlfing-Bastian,et al.  Delegation of strategic decision-making authority to middle managers , 2016 .

[6]  Lili-Anne Kihn,et al.  Information system integration, enabling control and performance , 2009 .

[7]  D. Brown,et al.  Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions , 2008 .

[8]  I. Beuren,et al.  Reflexos do sistema de mensuração de desempenho habilitante na performance de tarefas e satisfação no trabalho , 2018 .

[9]  M. Wouters,et al.  Using Prototypes to Induce Experimentation and Knowledge Integration in the Development of Enabling Accounting Information*: Prototypes to Induce Experimentation and Knowledge Integration , 2011 .

[10]  Hossein Nouri,et al.  The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment , 1998 .

[11]  Theresa Libby,et al.  Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice , 2010 .

[12]  Victor S. Maas,et al.  The effects of uncertainty on the roles of controllers and budgets: an exploratory study , 2011 .

[13]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Souplesse et efficience: Une étude sur le terrain des systèmes de contrôle de gestion d'une chaîne de restauration , 2004 .

[14]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department , 2008 .

[15]  Martin Messner,et al.  Management Control in New Product Development: The Dynamics of Managing Flexibility and Efficiency , 2009 .

[16]  Ranjani Krishnan,et al.  Budget Type and Performance — The Moderating Effect of Uncertainty , 2005 .

[17]  Jonas Gerdin,et al.  Developing Enabling Performance Measurement Systems: On the Interplay Between Numbers and Operational Knowledge , 2015 .

[18]  Laurie L. Burney,et al.  The Intersection of "Bad Apples, " "Bad Barrels, " and the Enabling Use of Performance Measurement Systems , 2017, J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  I. Beuren,et al.  Enabling and coercive management control systems and organizational resilience , 2019 .

[21]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies , 2005 .

[22]  Daniel Magalhães Mucci,et al.  As Múltiplas Funções do Orçamento Empresarial , 2016 .

[23]  D. Marginson,et al.  "Continuous" budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control , 2010 .

[24]  D. Marginson,et al.  Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers' budgeting behaviours , 2005 .

[25]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance : The Impact of Information and Environmental Volatility , 1992 .

[26]  Robert B. Welker,et al.  Testing a Model of Cognitive Budgetary Participation Processes in a Latent Variable Structural Equations Framework , 1996 .

[27]  Samuel Sponem,et al.  Exploring differences in budget characteristics, roles and satisfaction: A configurational approach , 2016 .

[28]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  An empirical analysis of the association between the use of executive support systems and perceived organizational competitiveness , 1999 .

[29]  Tiina Henttu-Aho.  Enabling characteristics of new budgeting practice and the role of controller , 2016 .

[30]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[31]  Jean-François Henri,et al.  Exploring the Consequences of Competing Uses of Budgets , 2020, Australian Accounting Review.

[32]  L. Kihn.  How do controllers and managers interpret budget targets , 2011 .