Diagnosis and reduction of bullwhip in supply chains

“Bullwhip” describes the general tendency for small changes in end‐customer demand to be amplified within a production‐distribution system. A 10 per cent increase in sales to end‐customers can precipitate a 40 per cent upswing in production and subsequent downswing (as excess stocks are depleted) within a three‐echelon supply chain. It is shown how proven material flow control principles significantly reduce bullwhip in a global supply chain. The evidence demonstrates that a methodology, which has evolved over several decades, provides a suitable framework for effective change. Bullwhip is not a new problem; it is a new name coined to describe a very well‐known problem. Some observed barriers to change are briefly reviewed.

[1]  A. Hameri.  A method to avoid demand amplification in bulk paper distribution , 1996 .

[2]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[3]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Supply Chain Dynamics—The Change Engineering Challenge of the Mid 1990s , 1992 .

[4]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Dynamic analysis of an inventory and order based production control system , 1982 .

[5]  Peter McCullen,et al.  The Impact of Agile Manufacturing on Supply Chain Dynamics , 1999 .

[6]  David Burden,et al.  Production-Inventory Systems: Planning and Control , 1979 .

[7]  C. Harland,et al.  The dynamics of customer dissatisfaction in supply chains , 1995 .

[8]  George Jr. Stalk Hout.  Competing Against Time : How Time Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets , 2002 .

[9]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Smoothing Supply Chain Dynamics , 1991 .

[10]  Michael Ballé.  The business process re-engineering action kit : a five day plan to redesign your processes , 1995 .

[11]  Philip Kaminsky,et al.  A New Computerized Beer Game: A Tool for Teaching the Value of Integrated Supply Chain Management 1 , 1998 .

[12]  John B. Houlihan.  International supply chain management , 1985 .

[13]  S. Disney,et al.  Speeding up the progress curve towards effective supply chain management , 2000 .

[14]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  Extending the beer game to include real-life supply chain characteristics , 1999 .

[15]  Jane Edghill,et al.  Industrial case-study on the dynamics and sensitivity of a close-coupled production-distribution system† , 1988 .

[16]  Charles H. Fine.  Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .

[17]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Coefficient plane models for control system analysis and design , 1981 .

[18]  J. Holmström.  Product range management: a case study of supply chain operations in the European grocery industry , 1997 .

[19]  D. Towill.  FORRIDGE - Principles of good practice in material flow , 1997 .

[20]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[21]  D. Farmer,et al.  Effective Pipeline Management: How to Manage Integrated Logistics , 1991 .

[22]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  The principles of production control , 1968 .

[23]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  The use of expert systems in the design of multi-echelon production distribution systems , 1988 .

[24]  C. New.  The Use of Throughput Efficiency as a Key Performance Measure for the New Manufacturing Era , 1993 .

[25]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[26]  David Helliwell Taylor,et al.  Demand amplification: has it got us beat? , 2000 .

[27]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[28]  J. P. Hofer,et al.  Problems in industrial dynamics , 1966 .

[29]  Nick Rich,et al.  The seven value stream mapping tools , 1997 .