The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood

Purpose Human vision has a puzzling stereoscopic anisotropy: horizontal depth corrugations are easier to detect than vertical depth corrugations. To date, little is known about the function or the underlying mechanism responsible for this anisotropy. Here, we aim to find out whether this anisotropy is independent of age. To answer this, we compare detection thresholds for horizontal and vertical depth corrugations as a function of age. Methods The depth corrugations were defined solely by the horizontal disparity of random dot patterns. The disparities depicted a horizontal or vertical sinusoidal depth corrugation of spatial frequency 0.1 cyc/deg. Detection thresholds were obtained using Bayesian adaptive staircases from a total of 159 subjects aged from 3 to 73 years. For each participant we computed the anisotropy index, defined as the log10-ratio of the detection threshold for vertical corrugations divided by that for horizontal. Results Anisotropy index was highly variable between individuals but was positive in 87% of the participants. There was a significant correlation between anisotropy index and log-age (r = 0.21, P = 0.008) mainly driven by a significant difference between children and adults. In 67 children aged 3 to 13 years, the mean anisotropy index was 0.34 ± 0.38 (mean ± SD, meaning that vertical thresholds were on average 2.2 times the horizontal ones), compared with 0.59 ± 0.55 in 84 adults aged 18 to 73 years (vertical 3.9 times horizontal). This was mainly driven by a decline in the sensitivity to vertical corrugations. Children had poorer stereoacuity than adults, but had similar sensitivity to adults for horizontal corrugations and were actually more sensitive than adults to vertical corrugations. Conclusions The fact that adults show stronger stereo anisotropy than children raises the possibility that visual experience plays a critical role in developing and strengthening the stereo anisotropy.

[1]  B. Rogers,et al.  Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: The role of orientation disparity , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  S. McKee,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[3]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[4]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Development of human visual function , 2011, Vision Research.

[6]  Jiawei Zhou,et al.  Similar Mechanisms Underlie the Detection of Horizontal and Vertical Disparity Corrugations , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  On the typical development of stereopsis: Fine and coarse processing , 2013, Vision Research.

[8]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Disparity sensitivity in man and owl: Psychophysical evidence for equivalent perception of shape-from-stereo. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[9]  C. Zaroff,et al.  Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  P L Emerson,et al.  Observations on maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods of forced-choice sequential threshold estimation , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D. N. Spinelli,et al.  Visual Experience Modifies Distribution of Horizontally and Vertically Oriented Receptive Fields in Cats , 1970, Science.

[12]  R. Fox,et al.  Stereoacuity in young children. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  A. Hohmann,et al.  Development of visual line acuity in humans. , 1982, Ophthalmic research.

[14]  Keith Langley,et al.  Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax , 2006, Vision Research.

[15]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment , 1970, Nature.

[16]  M. Landy,et al.  Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution So Low? , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Hamer,et al.  Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity , 2010, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  J. Sloper,et al.  Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[19]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  G. Cristóbal,et al.  Separating the chaff from the wheat: possible origins of the oblique effect. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Jenny C. A. Read,et al.  Stereoacuity with Frisby and Revised FD2 Stereo Tests , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  P E Romano,et al.  Stereoacuity development in children with normal binocular single vision. , 1975, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  E. Ciner,et al.  Stereoacuity Development: 6 Months to 5 Years. A New Tool for Testing and Screening , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  B. Julesz.  Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[26]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[27]  A Pentland,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Jeffrey A. Sloan,et al.  Spatial frequency analysis of the visual environment: Anisotropy and the carpentered environment hypothesis , 1978, Vision Research.

[29]  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza,et al.  Testing the horizontal-vertical stereo anisotropy with the critical-band masking paradigm. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[30]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Oblique stimuli are seen best (not worst!) in naturalistic broad-band stimuli: a horizontal effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[31]  Jenny Read,et al.  Spatial Stereoresolution for Depth Corrugations May Be Set in Primary Visual Cortex , 2011, BMC Neuroscience.

[32]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  Perspective, Orientation Disparity, and Anisotropy in Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1992, Perception.

[33]  B. Rogers,et al.  The stereoscopic anisotropy: individual differences and underlying mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  M. Scheiman,et al.  Stereoacuity Development in Young Children , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  J. Marsh,et al.  Anisotropies in the Perception of Three-Dimensional Surfaces , 2022 .

[36]  B Brown,et al.  Decrease in stereoacuity in the seventh decade of life , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[37]  Reduction in binocular enhancement of the visual-evoked potential during development accompanies increasing stereoacuity. , 1998, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[38]  Edward A Essock,et al.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[39]  C. Tyler,et al.  Stereoprocessing of cyclopean depth images: horizontally elongated summation fields , 2001, Vision Research.

[40]  Andrew J. Anderson,et al.  Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method , 2003, Vision Research.

[41]  J. Holmes,et al.  The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity. , 2009, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[42]  J Cooper,et al.  Comparing stereoscopic performance of children using the Titmus, TNO, and Randot stereo tests. , 1979, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[43]  Mohammed I. Alghamdi,et al.  Randot stereoacuity norms in a population of Saudi Arabian children , 1998, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[44]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[45]  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza,et al.  Multiple channels for horizontal, but only one for vertical corrugations? A new look at the stereo anisotropy. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[46]  I. Serrano-Pedraza,et al.  Visual suppression in intermittent exotropia during binocular alignment. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[47]  Mark F. Bradshaw,et al.  Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity , 1999, Vision Research.

[48]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Mechanisms underlying global stereopsis in fovea and periphery , 2013, Vision Research.

[49]  J. Daugman.  Spatial visual channels in the fourier plane , 1984, Vision Research.

[50]  Emily A. Cooper,et al.  Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment , 2015, Science Advances.