The OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project: history and background.

OBJECTIVE To describe the background, history, and approach of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) Project, an initiative to implement quality measures for international benchmarking of medical care at the health system level. METHOD The participating countries and international organizations selected five priority areas (cardiac care, diabetes, mental health, patient safety, and primary care/prevention) and developed a conceptual framework to guide the project. International expert panels were formed to identify clinically important, scientifically sound, and feasible measures based on a structured consensus process. RESULTS The consensus process was successfully completed in all five priority areas leading to a recommendation of 86 indicators. Nine indicators were selected for diabetes, 12 for mental health, 17 for cardiac care, 21 for patient safety, and 27 for primary care and prevention. CONCLUSIONS The initial experience of the HCQI Project demonstrates that international consensus can be achieved in how to measure the quality of care in priority areas, suggesting substantial demand for and interest in comparative information at the health system level. However, much additional work remains necessary before the project can supply policymakers and researchers with ongoing, comprehensive, and reliable data on the quality of care in industrialized countries.

[1]  S. Mattke,et al.  Selecting Indicators for the Quality of Mental Health Care at the Health Systems Level in OECD Countries , 2004 .

[2]  F Champagne,et al.  A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  F Berrino,et al.  EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94--results and commentary. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  P. Kramers,et al.  The ECHI project: health indicators for the European Community. , 2003, European journal of public health.

[5]  Gerard F Anderson,et al.  How does the quality of care compare in five countries? , 2004, Health affairs.

[6]  Jeremy Hurst,et al.  Health Care Quality Indicators Project Conceptual Framework Paper , 2006 .

[7]  P. Kramers,et al.  The ECHI project: health indicators for the European Community , 2003 .

[8]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Selecting indicators for the quality of diabetes care at the health systems level in OECD countries. , 2006, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[9]  Sheila Leatherman,et al.  The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis. , 2003, Health affairs.

[10]  S. Leatherman,et al.  Selecting Indicators for the Quality of Health Promotion, Prevention and Primary Care at the Health Systems Level in OECD Countries , 2004 .

[11]  P. M. Jonsson,et al.  Selecting indicators for patient safety at the health system level in OECD countries. , 2006, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[12]  B. Burnand,et al.  The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual , 2001 .