Single Step, a general approach for genomic selection
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ignacy Misztal | Andrés Legarra | Ignacio Aguilar | Ole F. Christensen | O. F. Christensen | A. Legarra | I. Misztal | I. Aguilar
[1] I Misztal,et al. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations? , 2014, Journal of dairy science.
[2] A Legarra,et al. Assessment of accuracy of genomic prediction for French Lacaune dairy sheep. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.
[3] Guosheng Su,et al. Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[4] P. VanRaden,et al. Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.
[5] C. Robert-Granié,et al. A first step toward genomic selection in the multi-breed French dairy goat population. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.
[6] Luis Varona,et al. On the Additive and Dominant Variance and Covariance of Individuals Within the Genomic Selection Scope , 2013, Genetics.
[7] Ignacy Misztal,et al. Genetic Evaluation using Unsymmetric Single Step Genomic Methodology with Large Number of Genotypes , 2013 .
[8] T. Knürr,et al. Single Step Evaluations using Haplotype Segments , 2013 .
[9] J. K. Bertrand,et al. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models. , 2013, Journal of animal science.
[10] B. Harris,et al. Impact of Including a Large Number of Female Genotypes on Genomic Selection , 2013 .
[11] L. Varona,et al. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[12] I Misztal,et al. Unknown-parent groups in single-step genomic evaluation. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.
[13] P. Hansen,et al. Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci for Rectal Temperature during Heat Stress in Holstein Cattle , 2013, PloS one.
[14] Moudud Alam,et al. A Novel Generalized Ridge Regression Method for Quantitative Genetics , 2013, Genetics.
[15] P Madsen,et al. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.
[16] A. Legarra,et al. Computation of deregressed proofs for genomic selection when own phenotypes exist with an application in French show-jumping horses. , 2013, Journal of animal science.
[17] Claude Chevalet,et al. Variance and Covariance of Actual Relationships between Relatives at One Locus , 2013, PloS one.
[18] I Misztal,et al. Methods to approximate reliabilities in single-step genomic evaluation. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.
[19] P M VanRaden,et al. Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.
[20] O. F. Christensen,et al. Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[21] Dorian J. Garrick,et al. A Fast EM Algorithm for BayesA-Like Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values , 2012, PloS one.
[22] P Madsen,et al. Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.
[23] M. Lund,et al. Estimating Additive and Non-Additive Genetic Variances and Predicting Genetic Merits Using Genome-Wide Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers , 2012, PloS one.
[24] A Legarra,et al. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.
[25] J. Pösö,et al. Single step genomic evaluations for the Nordic Red Dairy cattle test day data , 2012 .
[26] A Legarra,et al. Genomic selection in the French Lacaune dairy sheep breed. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.
[27] W. Muir,et al. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes. , 2012, Genetics research.
[28] M. Lund,et al. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.
[29] R. Wellmann,et al. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits. , 2012, Genetics research.
[30] Christian Maltecca,et al. Effectiveness of genomic prediction on milk flow traits in dairy cattle , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[31] B. Kinghorn,et al. A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[32] J. Woolliams,et al. The unified approach to the use of genomic and pedigree information in genomic evaluations revisited. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.
[33] I Misztal,et al. Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.
[34] I Misztal,et al. Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale. , 2011, Journal of animal science.
[35] I Misztal,et al. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. , 2011, Genetics research.
[36] R. Wellmann,et al. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation. , 2011, Genetics research.
[37] A. Legarra,et al. Use of a reduced set of single nucleotide polymorphisms for genetic evaluation of resistance to Salmonella carrier state in laying hens. , 2011, Poultry science.
[38] B S Weir,et al. Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. , 2011, Genetics research.
[39] V Ducrocq,et al. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.
[40] C. Robert-Granié,et al. Improved Lasso for genomic selection. , 2011, Genetics research.
[41] I Misztal,et al. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens. , 2011, Journal of animal science.
[42] Andrés Legarra,et al. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[43] R. Fernando,et al. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[44] Ignacy Misztal,et al. Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[45] P. Visscher,et al. Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[46] Zhe Zhang,et al. Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values Using a Trait-Specific Marker-Derived Relationship Matrix , 2010, PloS one.
[47] L. Varona,et al. A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[48] B. Harris,et al. Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.
[49] I Misztal,et al. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.
[50] M. Lund,et al. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[51] R. Fernando,et al. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[52] I Misztal,et al. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.
[53] I Misztal,et al. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.
[54] D. Garrick,et al. Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.
[55] José Crossa,et al. Predicting Quantitative Traits With Regression Models for Dense Molecular Markers and Pedigree , 2009, Genetics.
[56] P. Visscher,et al. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. , 2009, Genetics research.
[57] R. Fernando,et al. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[58] P. VanRaden,et al. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.
[59] P. VanRaden,et al. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.
[60] Andrés Legarra,et al. Performance of Genomic Selection in Mice , 2008, Genetics.
[61] I Misztal,et al. Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.
[62] Karin Meyer,et al. WOMBAT—A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML) , 2007, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.
[63] N Gengler,et al. A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.
[64] K. J. Abraham,et al. Improved techniques for sampling complex pedigrees with the Gibbs sampler , 2007, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[65] Ismo Strandén,et al. MiX99 - effective solver for large and complex linear mixed models. , 2006 .
[66] I. D. Boer,et al. Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding , 1993, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[67] D. Gianola,et al. Optimal properties of the conditional mean as a selection criterion , 1986, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[68] Jean-Jacques Colleau,et al. An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients , 2002, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[69] Ignacy Misztal,et al. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90) , 2002 .
[70] M. Goddard,et al. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.
[71] M. Lidauer,et al. Solving large mixed linear models using preconditioned conjugate gradient iteration. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.
[72] R. Fernando,et al. Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance. , 1997, Journal of animal science.
[73] Kermit Ritland,et al. Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients , 1996 .
[74] P M VanRaden,et al. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.
[75] G. Casella,et al. Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.
[76] Rick Spence. Simple extensions , 1989 .
[77] M Grossman,et al. Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction , 1989, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[78] R. L. Quaas,et al. Additive Genetic Model with Groups and Relationships , 1988 .
[79] C. N. Morris,et al. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .
[80] Daniel Gianola,et al. Bayesian Methods in Animal Breeding Theory , 1986 .
[81] C. Cockerham,et al. Analyses of gene frequencies. , 1973, Genetics.
[82] C. R. Henderson. SIRE EVALUATION AND GENETIC TRENDS , 1973 .
[83] C. Cockerham,et al. VARIANCE OF GENE FREQUENCIES , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[84] W. G. Cochran,et al. Improvement by Means of Selection , 1951 .
[85] H. F. Smith,et al. A DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION FOR PLANT SELECTION , 1936 .