Towards filmless and distance radiology

To many people radiology is synonymous with films. For 20 years or so, however, it has been possible to capture digitally data traditionally displayed on film, and that was true from the beginning of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging too. There is more to picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) than the economies of filmlessness and the ability to modify images. To realise the full potential of PACS requires huge and expensively equipped networks linking the radiology department, hospital wards, outpatient clinics, laboratories, family doctors' clinics, and so on, permitting simultaneous consultations on different sites and almost instant reporting from specialist radiologists at a distance. The data sets that need to be transferred are huge but some of the technical obstacles are now being overcome and the past few years have seen some hospitals move to a filmless state. The more common pattern, though, will be a piecemeal approach. PACS and teleradiology certainly provide a quicker imaging service. How soon a total PACS will save money for a hospital operating budget is less clear.

[1]  R Mattheus,et al.  European standardization efforts: an important framework for medical imaging. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[2]  R L Morin,et al.  infoRAD: computers for clinical practice and education in radiology. Teleradiology: fundamental considerations and clinical applications. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  A. Fymat,et al.  Teleradiology: will it transform the practice of radiology? , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  H K Huang,et al.  Clinical experience in the use of photostimulable phosphor radiographic systems. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[5]  D Gur,et al.  The hidden costs of delayed access to diagnostic imaging information: impact on PACS implementation. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Claude Nahmias,et al.  2048 x 2048 (2K) digital videofluorography (DVF): a clinical perspective , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[7]  J C Honeyman,et al.  Evaluation of requirements and planning for picture archiving and communication systems. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  T Endo,et al.  Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[9]  S C Horii,et al.  Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit. , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  L E Grenier,et al.  Current developments in departmental PACS for ultrasound. , 1995, Medinfo. MEDINFO.

[11]  W. D. Bidgood,et al.  Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  K. Lehmann,et al.  Digital fluoroscopic radiology: evaluation of the clinical impact. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[13]  M Osteaux,et al.  Picture archiving and communication system (PACS): a progressive approach with small systems. , 1996, European journal of radiology.

[14]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.