Numerical analysis of an osseointegrated prosthesis fixation with reduced bone failure risk and periprosthetic bone loss.

Currently available implants for direct attachment of prosthesis to the skeletal system after transfemoral amputation (OPRA system, Integrum AB, Sweden and ISP Endo/Exo prosthesis, ESKA Implants AG, Germany) show many advantages over the conventional socket fixation. However, restraining biomechanical issues such as considerable bone loss around the stem and peri-prosthetic bone fractures are present. To overcome these limiting issues a new concept of the direct intramedullary fixation was developed. We hypothesize that the new design will reduce the peri-prosthetic bone failure risk and adverse bone remodeling by restoring the natural load transfer in the femur. Generic CT-based finite element models of an intact femur and amputated bones implanted with 3 analyzed implants were created and loaded with a normal walking and a forward fall load. The strain adaptive bone remodeling theory was used to predict long-term bone changes around the implants and the periprosthetic bone failure risk was evaluated by the von Mises stress criterion. The results show that the new design provides close to physiological distribution of stresses in the bone and lower bone failure risk for the normal walking as compared to the OPRA and the ISP implants. The bone remodeling simulations did not reveal any overall bone loss around the new design, as opposed to the OPRA and the ISP implants, which induce considerable bone loss in the distal end of the femur. This positive outcome shows that the presented concept has a potential to considerably improve safety of the rehabilitation with the direct fixation implants.

[1]  Universitätsklinikum Münster,et al.  Langfristiger Einfluss der anatomisch angepassten spongiösen Endoprothese auf den periprothetischen Knochen , 2006 .

[2]  A. Tonino,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems , 1999 .

[3]  Kerstin Hagberg,et al.  Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Rickard Brånemark,et al.  Load on Osseointegrated Fixation of a Transfemoral Amputee During a Fall: Loading, Descent, Impact and Recovery Analysis , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Rehabilitation of the transfemoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: The United Kingdom experience , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  O. Büll Theoretische Aspekte und erste praktische Ergebnisse von perkutanen Exoprothesen bei Oberschenkelamputationen , 2006 .

[7]  A. Amis,et al.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Horst Heinrich Aschoff,et al.  Transcutaneous, distal femoral, intramedullary attachment for above-the-knee prostheses: an endo-exo device. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  W. Xu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress and Strain Analysis of a Transfemoral Osseointegration Implant , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  H Grundei,et al.  [The first osseointegrated percutaneous prosthesis anchor for above-knee amputees]. , 2001, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[11]  Joshua J Jacobs,et al.  Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[12]  W. Chambers San Antonio, Texas , 1940 .

[13]  Pieter U Dijkstra,et al.  Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  A Comparative Finite-Element Analysis of Bone Failure and Load Transfer of Osseointegrated Prostheses Fixations , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Tony Unsworth,et al.  Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H. , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  J. Keyak,et al.  Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  Armando Navarro The Development of a New Concept. , 1980 .

[18]  M. Bemben,et al.  BMD and Bone Geometry in Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputees , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  K. Staubach,et al.  Die Endo-Exo-Femurprothese , 2010, Der Unfallchirurg.

[20]  Jamshid Tehranzadeh,et al.  Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Balancing incompatible endoprosthetic design goals: a combined ingrowth and bone remodeling simulation. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  R. Martin,et al.  The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  K. Hagberg,et al.  Socket Versus Bone-Anchored Trans-Femoral Prostheses: Hip Range of Motion and Sitting Comfort , 2005, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[24]  W. Hozack,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems. A Matched-Pair Analysis of Coated and Uncoated Implants* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  Gordon Blunn,et al.  Osseocutaneous integration of an intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis implant used for reconstruction of a transhumeral amputee: case report. , 2010, The Journal of hand surgery.

[26]  C. Lunow,et al.  [Endo-exo femoral prosthesis: clinical course after primary implantation of an intramedullary percutaneous endo-exo femoral prosthesis following upper leg amputation]. , 2010, Der Unfallchirurg.

[27]  K. Hagberg,et al.  One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses--rehabilitation perspective. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[28]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Experimental assessment of a new direct fixation implant for artificial limbs. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[29]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A Low Stiffness Composite Biologically Fixed Prosthesis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  Wei Xu,et al.  X-Ray Image Review of the Bone Remodeling Around an Osseointegrated Trans-femoral Implant and a Finite Element Simulation Case Study , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  A. Clausen,et al.  Die Endo-Exo-Femurprothese – ein neues Konzept zur knochengeführten, prothetischen Versorgung von oberschenkelamputierten Patienten , 2009 .

[33]  Nazirah Binti Hasnan Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering , 2013 .

[34]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  Patrick J McMahon,et al.  Adaptive glenoid bone remodeling simulation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  K. Hagberg,et al.  Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: Prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[38]  R. Eastell,et al.  Bone loss around 2 different types of hip prostheses. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[39]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  J. Lauritzen,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur following uncemented total knee arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[41]  B. Rydevik,et al.  Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  A. Amis,et al.  The influence of tibial component fixation techniques on resorption of supporting bone stock after total knee replacement. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Joint area constraint had no influence on bone loss in proximal tibia 5 years after total knee replacement , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[44]  Vivek Trikha,et al.  Clinical Study , 1961, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[45]  Patrick J McMahon,et al.  Effect of glenoid prosthesis design on glenoid bone remodeling: adaptive finite element based simulation. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  Naoto Saito,et al.  Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty , 2000, The Lancet.

[47]  Jan H B Geertzen,et al.  University of Groningen Skin Problems of the Stump in Lower Limb Amputees Meulenbelt, , 2011 .

[48]  HighWire Press,et al.  The journal of bone and joint surgery - British volume , 1948 .

[49]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[50]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.