The generation of problem-focussed patent clusters: a comparative analysis of crowd intelligence with algorithmic and expert approaches

This paper presents a new crowdsourcing approach to the construction of patent clusters, and systematically benchmarks it against previous expert and algorithmic approaches. Patent databases should be rich sources of inspiration that could lead engineering designers to novel solutions for creative problems. However, the sheer volume and complexity of patent information means this potential is rarely realised. Rather than the keyword driven searches common in commercial systems designers need tools that help them understand patents in the context of the problem they are considering. This paper presents an approach to address this problem by using crowd intelligence for effective generation of patent clusters at lower cost and with greater rationale. A systematic study was carried out to compare the crowd's efficiency with both expert and algorithmic patent clusters, with results indicating that the crowd was able to create 80% more patent pairs with appropriate rationale.

[1]  Aviv Segev,et al.  Identification of trends from patents using self-organizing maps , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Linda Kato,et al.  Exploratory analytics on patent data sets using the SIMPLE platform , 2011 .

[3]  Sunghae Jun,et al.  Document clustering method using dimension reduction and support vector clustering to overcome sparseness , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Sunghae Jun,et al.  Graphical causal inference and copula regression model for apple keywords by text mining , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[5]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Service-oriented Technology Roadmap (SoTRM) using patent map for R&D strategy of service industry , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Yi Ren,et al.  When Crowdsourcing Fails: A Study of Expertise on Crowdsourced Design Evaluation , 2015 .

[7]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  The united innovation process: integrating science, design, and entrepreneurship as sub-processes , 2015, Design Science.

[8]  Frank Passing,et al.  Applying an anchor based patent mapping approach: Basic conception and the case of carbon fiber reinforcements , 2016 .

[9]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Samee U. Khan,et al.  A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Li-wei Zhang,et al.  Research of Technical Development Trend and Hot Points Based on Text Mining , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science.

[12]  Petra Moser.  Patents and Innovation: Evidence from Economic History , 2012 .

[13]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities , 2011, Scientometrics.

[14]  Chien-Yi Huang,et al.  Developing a Rework Process for Underfilled Electronics Components via Integration of TRIZ and Cluster Analysis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology.

[15]  Türkay Dereli,et al.  Classifying technology patents to identify trends: Applying a fuzzy-based clustering approach in the Turkish textile industry , 2009 .

[16]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[17]  Andy Gibbs,et al.  Advanced document retrieval techniques for patent research , 2008 .

[18]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A METHODOLOGY FOR DISCOVERING STRUCTURE IN DESIGN DATABASES , 2011 .

[19]  Riccardo Apreda,et al.  Automatic extraction of function-behaviour-state information from patents , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[20]  Jef R. Peeters,et al.  Effectiveness of the PAnDA ideation tool , 2010 .

[21]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  A Fuzzy Ontological Knowledge Document Clustering Methodology , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[22]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Deployment of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge , 2004, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[24]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Using design database structures to characterize freedom-to-operate in a design space: A legal case study , 2013 .

[25]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Dragan Kukolj,et al.  PSALM - Tool for business intelligence , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the 35th International Convention MIPRO.

[27]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Discovering Structure in Design Databases Through Functional and Surface Based Mapping , 2013 .

[28]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  A knowledge centric methodology for dental implant technology assessment using ontology based patent analysis and clinical meta-analysis , 2014, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[29]  Jonathan Corney,et al.  The analysis and presentation of patents to support engineering design , 2016 .

[30]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Creating patents on the new technology using analogy-based patent mining , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Expert representation of design repository space: A comparison to and validation of algorithmic output , 2013 .

[32]  Peter Atzmüller,et al.  Semantic enrichment and added metadata – Examples of efficient usage in an industrial environment , 2009 .

[33]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[34]  Min Yan,et al.  Representing design knowledge as a network of function, behaviour and structure , 1993 .

[35]  Dragan Kukolj,et al.  Comparison of algorithms for patent documents clusterization , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the 35th International Convention MIPRO.

[36]  Liu Bin,et al.  Technology and Effect Matrix for Patent Clustering , 2013, 2013 10th Web Information System and Application Conference.

[37]  Yongtae Park,et al.  On the Development and Application of a Self-Organizing Feature Map-Based Patent Map , 2002 .

[38]  Bokyoung Kang,et al.  Novelty-focused patent mapping for technology opportunity analysis , 2015 .

[39]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  Technology-driven roadmaps for identifying new product/market opportunities: Use of text mining and quality function deployment , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[40]  Dongwoo Kang,et al.  An SAO-based text mining approach to building a technology tree for technology planning , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[41]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[42]  Dragan Kukolj,et al.  Effectiveness of text processing in patent documents visualization , 2013, 2013 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY).

[43]  Indra Budi,et al.  Clustering patent document in the field of ICT (Information & Communication Technology) , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval.

[44]  Jong Hwan Suh,et al.  A New Visualization Method for Patent Map: Application to Ubiquitous Computing Technology , 2006, ADMA.

[45]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis.  Demographics of Mechanical Turk , 2010 .

[46]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  Using patent data for technology forecasting: China RFID patent analysis , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[47]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Design-by-analogy: experimental evaluation of a functional analogy search methodology for concept generation improvement , 2015 .

[48]  Chin-Yuan Fan,et al.  Applying K-means clustering and technology map in Asia Pacific-semiconductors industry analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[49]  Masatsura Igami,et al.  Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications , 2008, Scientometrics.

[50]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  Clustering patents using non-exhaustive overlaps , 2010 .

[51]  Joost R. Duflou,et al.  SEABIRD: Scalable search for systematic biologically inspired design , 2015, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[52]  David Harrison,et al.  Identifying patent conflicts: TRIZ-Led patent mapping , 2014 .

[53]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search , 2014 .