E-portfolio assessment in an online English language course

Many teachers have the tendency to look at only the standardized test scores of their students while ignoring how or why various dimensions of language proficiency has improved or not improved. Portfolio, however, reveals a clear picture of the student's growth and development. This study reflects that traditional approaches to assessment of student progress in EFL writing lack indicators of students' development of the skill and aims to answer the following questions: what are the learning gains of students who keep an e-portfolio as part of an elementary-level English course and what are student perceptions about the online course, using an e-portfolio and their learning gains? For this aim, the researchers worked with two groups of students: the e-portfolio group who kept an electronic portfolio in the online elementary level English language course and the traditional assessment group who did not keep an e-portfolio. Although there were not significant differences between the post-test scores of the two groups, there were significant learning gains in both groups. The perceptions of the students in the e-portfolio group reflected that they benefited from and enjoyed keeping a portfolio.

[1]  Authentic Progress Assessment of Oral Language: Oral Portfolios. , 2001 .

[2]  R. French.  Portfolio Assessment and LEP Students. , 1992 .

[3]  Sevdeğer Çeçen,et al.  The Effects of Portfolio Keeping on Writing Anxiety of EFL Students , 2007 .

[4]  Teresa Garcia,et al.  Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. , 1994 .

[5]  Barbara Bray.  Eight Steps to Success: Technology Staff Development That Works. , 1999 .

[6]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[7]  Shumei Zhang.  Has Portfolio Assessment Become Common Practice in EFL Classrooms? Empirical Studies from China , 2009 .

[8]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Performance-Based Assessment and Educational Equity , 1994 .

[9]  J van Tartwijk,et al.  The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study , 2005, Medical education.

[10]  R. Dunn,et al.  Survey of research on learning styles , 1989 .

[11]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .

[12]  J. M. O'malley,et al.  A Portfolio Assessment Model for ESL. , 1994 .

[13]  Cynthia E. Glidden.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (2nd ed.). , 1993 .

[14]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  Performance and Portfolio Assessment for Language Minority Students. Program Information Guide Series, 9. , 1992 .

[15]  Diane Lapp,et al.  Reporting Reading Progress: A Comparison Portfolio for Parents. , 1989 .

[16]  G. Madaus,et al.  Searching for Alternatives to Standardized Tests: Whys, Whats, and Whithers. , 1989 .

[17]  R. Calfee,et al.  Advancing Academic Literacy through Teachers' Assessments. , 1989 .

[18]  Debra Lucas,et al.  Personality Type (MBTI) Relationship to Performance and Satisfaction in Web-based Instruction (WBI) , 2007 .

[19]  Icy Lee,et al.  Balancing the dual functions of portfolio assessment , 2010 .

[20]  Alexandra Nunes.  Portfolios in the EFL classroom: disclosing an informed practice , 2004 .

[21]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  Assessing the Portfolio: Principles for Practice, Theory, and Research , 2000 .

[22]  Jim Parsons,et al.  A Note on Using Portfolios To Assess Learning. , 1999 .