Adverse childhood experiences and sexual dysfunction in midlife women: Is there a link?

BACKGROUND One in 3 children has had at least 1 adverse childhood experience (ACE), and ACEs have been associated with multiple medical and psychiatric morbidities in women later in life, including greater menopause symptom burden. AIM To evaluate the association between ACEs and female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in midlife women. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis from DREAMS-the Data Registry on Experiences of Aging, Menopause, and Sexuality-was conducted with questionnaires completed by women aged 40 to 65 years who presented to a women's health clinic at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from May 2015 to December 2016. History of ACEs was obtained with the validated ACE questionnaire. FSD was assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index and the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised. OUTCOMES The association between ACEs and FSD (defined as Female Sexual Function Index score ≤26.55 and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score ≥11) was evaluated via a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusting for age, menopause status, hormone therapy use, anxiety, depression, relationship satisfaction, hot flash severity, and history of abuse in the past year. RESULTS Women (N = 1572) had a mean age of 53.2 years. Overall 59% reported having at least 1 ACE. When compared with no ACEs, a history of ≥4 ACEs significantly increased the odds of not being sexually active (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.30-2.57; P < .001). Among sexually active women, the proportion of women with FSD increased sequentially as the number of ACEs increased. In the univariate analysis, a history of ≥4 ACEs significantly increased the odds of FSD as compared with no ACEs (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.50-2.99; P < .001). The association remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.15-2.68; P = .009). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The findings highlight an opportunity for clinicians to screen for ACEs in women with sexual dysfunction and offer appropriate treatment and counseling as indicated. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS Strengths of the study include the large cohort, the use of validated tools for assessment of ACEs and FSD, and the adjustment for multiple potential confounding factors. Limitations include the cross-sectional study design, recall bias in reporting ACEs and recent abuse, and the low representation of racially and ethnically diverse women in the cohort. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates an increased risk of sexual inactivity and sexual dysfunction in midlife women who experienced childhood adversity. The sexual dysfunction in women with ACEs seems to be independent of other factors that potentially affect female sexual function in midlife.