Genetic Analysis of Ephrin-A2 and Ephrin-A5 Shows Their Requirement in Multiple Aspects of Retinocollicular Mapping

Ephrin-A2 and -A5 are thought to be anteroposterior mapping labels for the retinotectal/retinocollicular projection. Here, gene disruptions of both these ephrins are characterized. Focal retinal labeling reveals moderate map abnormalities when either gene is disrupted. Double heterozygotes also have a phenotype, showing an influence of absolute levels. In vitro assays indicate these ephrins are required for repellent activity in the target and also normal responsiveness in the retina. In double homozygotes, anteroposterior order is almost though not completely lost. Temporal or nasal retinal labelings reveal quantitatively similar but opposite shifts, with multiple terminations scattered widely over the target. These results indicate an axon competition mechanism for mapping, with a critical role for ephrins as anteroposterior topographic labels. Dorsoventral topography is also impaired, showing these ephrins are required in mapping both axes.

[1]  G. Schneider,et al.  Orderly compression of the retinotectal projection following partial tectal ablation in the newborn hamster , 1979, Nature.

[2]  S. Henke-Fahle,et al.  Avoidance of posterior tectal membranes by temporal retinal axons. , 1987, Development.

[3]  F. Bonhoeffer,et al.  The Eph family in retinal axon guidance , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Identification and cloning of ELF-1, a developmentally expressed ligand for the Mek4 and Sek receptor tyrosine kinases , 1994, Cell.

[5]  U. Drescher,et al.  Topographic targeting and pathfinding errors of retinal axons following overexpression of ephrinA ligands on retinal ganglion cell axons. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[6]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Molecular Development of Sensory Maps Representing Sights and Smells in the Brain , 1999, Cell.

[7]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Detection of Ligands in Regions Anatomically Connected to Neurons Expressing the Eph Receptor Bsk: Potential Roles in Neuron–Target Interaction , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo , 1996, Cell.

[9]  J Huf,et al.  Response of retinal ganglion cell axons to striped linear gradients of repellent guidance molecules. , 1998, Journal of neurobiology.

[10]  P. Godement,et al.  Cross-species recognition of tectal cues by retinal fibers in vitro. , 1989, Development.

[11]  J G Flanagan,et al.  The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographic Guidance Labels in a Sensory Projection to the Forebrain , 1998, Neuron.

[13]  R. Sperry.  CHEMOAFFINITY IN THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF NERVE FIBER PATTERNS AND CONNECTIONS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  D. Cerretti,et al.  Characterization of the genes for mouse LERK-3/Ephrin-A3 (Epl3), mouse LERK-4/Ephrin-A4 (Epl4), and human LERK-6/Ephrin-A2 (EPLG6): conservation of intron/exon structure. , 1998, Genomics.

[15]  F. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Chromophore-assisted laser inactivation of a repulsive axonal guidance molecule , 1996, Current Biology.

[16]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Polarized expression of the receptor protein tyrosine kinase Cek5 in the developing avian visual system. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[17]  D. Willshaw,et al.  On a role for competition in the formation of patterned neural connexions , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  M. Bronner‐Fraser,et al.  The receptor tyrosine kinase QEK5 mRNA is expressed in a gradient within the neural retina and the tectum. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[19]  R. Klein,et al.  Similarities and Differences in the Way Transmembrane-Type Ligands Interact with the Elk Subclass of Eph Receptors , 1996, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[20]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Control of topographic retinal axon branching by inhibitory membrane-bound molecules. , 1994, Science.

[22]  R. Bronson,et al.  Neonatal lethality and lymphopenia in mice with a homozygous disruption of the c-abl proto-oncogene , 1991, Cell.

[23]  A. Flenniken,et al.  Eph Receptors and Ligands Comprise Two Major Specificity Subclasses and Are Reciprocally Compartmentalized during Embryogenesis , 1996, Neuron.

[24]  H Honda,et al.  Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  H. Baier,et al.  Mutations disrupting the ordering and topographic mapping of axons in the retinotectal projection of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. , 1996, Development.

[26]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF‐1 in guiding retinal axons , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[27]  R. Hunt,et al.  Retinotectal specificity: models and experiments in search of a mapping function. , 1980, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  J R Sanes,et al.  Lamina-specific connectivity in the brain: regulation by N-cadherin, neurotrophins, and glycoconjugates. , 1997, Science.

[29]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on optic axon branching and remodelling in vivo , 1995, Nature.

[30]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases , 1995, Cell.

[31]  C. Shatz.  Emergence of order in visual system development. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  C. Cepko,et al.  Misexpression of the Emx-Related Homeobox Genes cVax and mVax2 Ventralizes the Retina and Perturbs the Retinotectal Map , 1999, Neuron.

[33]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map , 1995, Cell.

[34]  Franco Weth,et al.  Modulation of EphA Receptor Function by Coexpressed EphrinA Ligands on Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons , 1999, Neuron.

[35]  H. Baier,et al.  Axon guidance by gradients of a target-derived component. , 1992, Science.

[36]  A. Flenniken,et al.  Distinct and overlapping expression patterns of ligands for Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases during mouse embryogenesis. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[37]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Graded and lamina-specific distributions of ligands of EphB receptor tyrosine kinases in the developing retinotectal system. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[38]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of Eph receptors suggest multiple mechanisms in patterning of the visual system. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[39]  Jonas Frisén,et al.  Ephrin-A5 (AL-1/RAGS) Is Essential for Proper Retinal Axon Guidance and Topographic Mapping in the Mammalian Visual System , 1998, Neuron.

[40]  G. Feng,et al.  Roles for Ephrins in Positionally Selective Synaptogenesis between Motor Neurons and Muscle Fibers , 2000, Neuron.

[41]  P. Leder,et al.  Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization. , 1994, Genes & development.

[42]  J. Sanes,et al.  The Eph Kinase Ligand AL-1 Is Expressed by Rostral Muscles and Inhibits Outgrowth from Caudal Neurons , 1996, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[43]  C. Holt,et al.  Inhibition of FGF Receptor Activity in Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons Causes Errors in Target Recognition , 1996, Neuron.

[44]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Ehk-1 and Ehk-2: two novel members of the Eph receptor-like tyrosine kinase family with distinctive structures and neuronal expression. , 1993, Oncogene.

[45]  A Gierer,et al.  Model for the retino-tectal projection , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[46]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Retinotectal maps: molecules, models and misplaced data , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Eph family receptors and their ligands distribute in opposing gradients in the developing mouse retina. , 1996, Developmental biology.