The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models

SUMMARY Most applications of the publicly released Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment monthly gravity field models require the application of a spatial filter to help suppressing noise and other systematic errors present in the data. The most common approach makes use of a simple Gaussian averaging process, which is often combined with a ‘destriping’ technique in which coefficient correlations within a given degree are removed. As brute force methods, neither of these techniques takes into consideration the statistical information from the gravity solution itself and, while they perform well overall, they can often end up removing more signal than necessary. Other optimal filters have been proposed in the literature; however, none have attempted to make full use of all information available from the monthly solutions. By examining the underlying principles of filter design, a filter has been developed that incorporates the noise and full signal variance–covariance matrix to tailor the filter to the error characteristics of a particular monthly solution. The filter is both anisotropic and nonsymmetric, meaning it can accommodate noise of an arbitrary shape, such as the characteristic stripes. The filter minimizes the mean-square error and, in this sense, can be considered as the most optimal filter possible. Through both simulated and real data scenarios, this improved filter will be shown to preserve the highest amount of gravity signal when compared to other standard techniques, while simultaneously minimizing leakage effects and producing smooth solutions in areas of low signal.

[1]  F. LeMoine,et al.  The use of mascons to resolve time-variable gravity from GRACE , 2007 .

[2]  Ki-Weon Seo,et al.  Optimized smoothing of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) time‐variable gravity observations , 2006 .

[3]  J. Wahr,et al.  Measurements of Time-Variable Gravity Show Mass Loss in Antarctica , 2006, Science.

[4]  Willi Freeden,et al.  Constructive Approximation on the Sphere: With Applications to Geomathematics , 1998 .

[5]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  A statistical filtering approach for Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity data , 2008 .

[6]  S. Swenson,et al.  Methods for inferring regional surface‐mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time‐variable gravity , 2002 .

[7]  Sean S. B. Moore,et al.  FFTs for the 2-Sphere-Improvements and Variations , 1996 .

[8]  Pavel Ditmar,et al.  Localized spectral analysis of global satellite gravity fields for recovering time-variable mass redistributions , 2008 .

[9]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[10]  Ingo Sasgen,et al.  Wiener optimal filtering of GRACE data , 2006 .

[11]  P. Ditmar,et al.  Gravity Field Modeling on the Basis of GRACE Range-Rate Combinations , 2007 .

[12]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[13]  Roland Klees,et al.  Computation of spherical harmonic coefficients from gravity gradiometry data to be acquired by the GOCE satellite: regularization issues , 2003 .

[14]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The bias in GRACE estimates of continental water storage variations , 2006 .

[15]  F. LeMoine,et al.  Resolving mass flux at high spatial and temporal resolution using GRACE intersatellite measurements , 2005 .

[16]  P. Milly,et al.  Global Modeling of Land Water and Energy Balances. Part I: The Land Dynamics (LaD) Model , 2002 .

[17]  J. Kusche Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[18]  Frederik J. Simons,et al.  Spatiospectral localization of global geopotential fields from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) reveals the coseismic gravity change owing to the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2008 .

[19]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Basin scale estimates of evapotranspiration using GRACE and other observations , 2004 .

[20]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[21]  C. Shum,et al.  Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement , 2005 .

[22]  E. Schrama,et al.  Improved accuracy of GRACE gravity solutions through empirical orthogonal function filtering of spherical harmonics , 2007 .

[23]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Comparison of two model approaches in the Zambezi river basin with regard to model reliability and identifiability , 2005 .

[24]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Terrestrial water mass load changes from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) , 2006 .