ARE WE THERE YET? INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF DESIGN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE IN CONVERGENCE TIME

In distributed design individual designers have local control over design variables and seek to minimize their own individual objectives. The amount of time required to reach equilibrium solutions in decentralized design can vary based on the design process architecture chosen. There are two primary design process architectures, sequential and parallel, and a number of possible combinations of these architectures. In this paper a game theoretic approach is developed to determine the time required for a parallel and sequential architecture to converge to a solution for a two designer case. The equations derived solve for the time required to converge to a solution in closed form without any objective function evaluations. This result is validated by analyzing a distributed design case study. In this study the equations accurately predict the convergence time for a sequential and parallel architecture. A second validation is performed by analyzing a large number of randomly generated two designer systems. The approach in this case successfully predicts convergence within 3 iterations for nearly 98% of the systems analyzed. The remaining 2% highlight one of the approach’s weaknesses; it is susceptible to numerically ill conditioned problems. Understanding the rate at which distributed design problems converge is of key importance when determining design architectures. This work begins the investigation with a two designer case and lays the groundwork to expand to larger design systems with multiple design variables.Copyright © 2009 by ASME

[1]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  AN OPTIMAL MARKETING AND ENGINEERING DESIGN MODEL FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT USING ANALYTICAL TARGET CASCADING , 2004 .

[2]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[3]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design , 1997 .

[4]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[5]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[6]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[7]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Concurrent Subspace Optimization Using Design Variable Sharing in a Distributed Computing Environment , 1996 .

[8]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A Study of Convergence in Decentralized Design , 2003, DAC 2003.

[9]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Advancement of Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 2000 .

[10]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  An Investigation of Equilibrium Stability in Decentralized Design Using Nonlinear Control Theory , 2004 .

[11]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A study of convergence in decentralized design processes , 2005 .

[12]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[13]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  A Deterministic Lagrangian-Based Global Optimization Approach for Large Scale Decomposable Problems , 2008, DAC 2008.

[14]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[15]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Convergence and Stability in Distributed Design of Large Systems , 2004, DAC 2004.

[16]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .

[17]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Ordering design tasks based on coupling strengths , 1994 .

[18]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1992 .

[19]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanskisobieski,et al.  On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems , 1988 .

[20]  J. Nash.  NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.

[21]  J. L. Rogers.  DeMAID/GA an Enhanced Design Manager's Aid for Intelligent Decomposition , 1996 .

[22]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Planning Concurrency and Managing Iteration in Projects , 2001 .

[23]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Non-Cooperative Games , 2000 .

[24]  Kemper Lewis.  The tradeoffs between cooperative and approximate cooperative formulations in multidisciplinary design , 1998 .

[25]  T. L. Vincent,et al.  Game Theory as a Design Tool , 1983 .

[26]  Carlos S. Kubrusly.  Convergence and Stability , 2003 .

[27]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Modeling Subsystem Interactions: A Game Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[28]  Christopher Meyer,et al.  Fast Cycle Time: How to Align Purpose, Strategy, and Structure for Speed , 1993 .

[29]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design , 1996 .

[30]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Decentralized Design at the Edge of Rationality , 2006 .

[31]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  ADAPTIVE RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD - A GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION SCHEME FOR APPROXIMATION-BASED DESIGN PROBLEMS , 2001 .