Skin-derived microorgan autotransplantation as a novel approach for therapeutic angiogenesis.

Despite promising preclinical results, transient single-factor-based therapeutic angiogenesis has shown no definitive benefits in clinical trials. The use of skin-derived microorgans (SMOs), capable of sustained expression of angiogenic factors and sustained viability with their cellular and extracellular elements, constitutes an attractive alternative. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of SMO implantation in a porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia. Eighteen pigs underwent placement of an ameroid constrictor on the proximal circumflex artery. Three weeks later, split-thickness skin biopsies were harvested and pigs were randomized to lateral wall implantation of either 8 or 16 SMOs or blank injections. The procedure was safe and resulted in no adverse events. Three weeks after treatment, SMO implantation resulted in significant improvement of lateral wall perfusion during pacing, assessed by isotope-labeled microspheres [post- vs. pretreatment ratios of lateral/anterior wall blood flow were 1.31 +/- 0.09 (SMOs) and 1.04 +/- 0.06 (controls); P = 0.03]. No significant difference in angiographic scores was observed. Microvascular relaxation in response to VEGF was impaired in the ischemic territory of the control group but returned to normal after SMO implantation, indicating restoration of endothelial function. Molecular studies showed significant increases in VEGF and CD31 expression in the ischemic area of treated animals. Morphometric analysis showed increased neovascularization with SMO treatment. Autotransplantation of SMOs constitutes a novel approach for safe and effective therapeutic angiogenesis with improvement in perfusion, normalization of microvascular reactivity, and increased expression of VEGF and CD31.

[1]  M. Marikovsky,et al.  Skin-Derived Micro-Organs Induce Angiogenesis in Rabbits , 2006, Journal of Vascular Research.

[2]  J. Wykrzykowska,et al.  TRANSENDOCARDIAL AND TRANSEPICARDIAL INTRAMYOCARDIAL FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR-2 ADMINISTRATION: MYOCARDIAL AND TISSUE DISTRIBUTION , 2005, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[3]  G. Nadel,et al.  Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions allow for epidermal cells to display an in vivo-like phenotype in vitro. , 2005, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[4]  E. Hasson,et al.  A Cell-Based Multifactorial Approach to Angiogenesis , 2005, Journal of Vascular Research.

[5]  J. Wykrzykowska,et al.  Transendocardial and trans-epicardial intramyocardial FGF-2 administration : Myocardial and Tissue Distribution , 2005 .

[6]  F. Sellke,et al.  Inhibition of the cardiac angiogenic response to exogenous vascular endothelial growth factor. , 2004, Surgery.

[7]  P. Oettgen,et al.  RTEF-1, a Novel Transcriptional Stimulator of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Hypoxic Endothelial Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  正史 渋谷 血管新生とその制御―VEGF と受容体を中心に― , 2004 .

[9]  F. Sellke,et al.  Hypoxia induces myocyte-dependent COX-2 regulation in endothelial cells: role of VEGF. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[10]  F. Sellke,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in VEGF-induced Vasodilation: VEGF Dilates Microvessels but Not Epicardial and Systemic Arteries and Veins , 2003, Annals of vascular surgery.

[11]  Brian H Annex,et al.  The VIVA Trial Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis , 2003 .

[12]  H. Fine,et al.  Bone marrow-derived, endothelial progenitor-like cells as angiogenesis-selective gene-targeting vectors , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[13]  F. Sellke,et al.  Intrapericardial administration of basic fibroblast growth factor: Myocardial and tissue distribution and comparison with intracoronary and intravenous administration , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  P. Oettgen,et al.  Bone marrow transplantation for the heart: fact or fiction? , 2003, The Lancet.

[15]  T. Asahara,et al.  Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for vascular regeneration. , 2002, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[16]  T. Henry,et al.  Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial , 2002, Circulation.

[17]  Imo E. Hoefer,et al.  Role of Ischemia and of Hypoxia-Inducible Genes in Arteriogenesis After Femoral Artery Occlusion in the Rabbit , 2001, Circulation research.

[18]  B. Bussolati,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 modulates vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated angiogenesis via nitric oxide. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[19]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth. , 2001, Cardiovascular research.

[20]  F. Loop,et al.  Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular DiseaseIsolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: Late consequences of incomplete revascularization☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[21]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Molecular Basis of Angiogenesis: Role of VEGF and VE‐Cadherin , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Pearlman,et al.  Coronary angiogenesis: detection in vivo with MR imaging sensitive to collateral neocirculation--preliminary study in pigs. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  J. Pearlman,et al.  Intrapericardial delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 induces neovascularization in a porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[24]  J. Pearlman,et al.  Local perivascular delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: results of a phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[25]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Direct myocardial revascularization and angiogenesis--how many patients might be eligible? , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  F. Sellke,et al.  Intracoronary and intravenous administration of basic fibroblast growth factor: myocardial and tissue distribution. , 1999, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[27]  R. Busse,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulates nitric oxide synthase expression in endothelial cells. , 1999, Cardiovascular research.

[28]  F. Sellke,et al.  Comparison of VEGF delivery techniques on collateral-dependent microvascular reactivity. , 1998, Microvascular research.

[29]  Judahfolkman Angiogenic Therapy of the Human Heart , 1998 .

[30]  F. Sellke,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of intracoronary VEGF delivery: evidence of tachyphylaxis and NO dependence of response. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[31]  R Bicknell,et al.  Nitric oxide synthase lies downstream from vascular endothelial growth factor-induced but not basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[32]  J. Folkman,et al.  Angiogenesis and angiogenesis inhibition: an overview. , 1997, EXS.

[33]  D. Harrison,et al.  Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA, protein, and activity during cell growth. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.