The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli.

The systemic model for floral induction, dubbed florigen, was conceived in photoperiod-sensitive plants but implies, in its ultimate form, a graft-transmissible signal that, although activated by different stimuli in different flowering systems, is common to all plants. We show that SFT (SINGLE-FLOWER TRUSS), the tomato ortholog of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), induces flowering in day-neutral tomato and tobacco plants and is encoded by SFT. sft tomato mutant plants are late-flowering, with altered architecture and flower morphology. SFT-dependent graft-transmissible signals complement all developmental defects in sft plants and substitute for long-day stimuli in Arabidopsis, short-day stimuli in Maryland Mammoth tobacco, and light-dose requirements in tomato uniflora mutant plants. The absence of donor SFT RNA from flowering receptor shoots and the localization of the protein in leaf nuclei implicate florigen-like messages in tomato as a downstream pathway triggered by cell-autonomous SFT RNA transcripts. Flowering in tomato is synonymous with termination of the shoot apical meristems, and systemic SFT messages attenuate the growth of apical meristems before and independent of floral production. Floral enhancement by systemic SFT signals is therefore one pleiotropic effect of FT orthologs.

[1]  A. Samach,et al.  The Flowering Integrator FT Regulates SEPALLATA3 and FRUITFULL Accumulation in Arabidopsis Leavesw⃞ , 2005, The Plant Cell Online.

[2]  François Parcy,et al.  The mRNA of the Arabidopsis Gene FT Moves from Leaf to Shoot Apex and Induces Flowering , 2005, Science.

[3]  Wolfgang Busch,et al.  Integration of Spatial and Temporal Information During Floral Induction in Arabidopsis , 2005, Science.

[4]  K. Goto,et al.  FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex , 2005, Science.

[5]  Shelley Hepworth,et al.  CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis , 2004, Development.

[6]  Robert Turgeon,et al.  Graft Transmission of a Floral Stimulant Derived from CONSTANS1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[7]  Naama Menda,et al.  In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[8]  C. Dean,et al.  Multiple Pathways in the Decision to Flower: Enabling, Promoting, and Resetting , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[9]  D. Zamir,et al.  The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[10]  J. Kinet,et al.  Flowering in the uniflora mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): description of the reproductive structure and manipulation of flowering time , 1998, Plant Growth Regulation.

[11]  M. Jamilena,et al.  SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS regulates the transition and maintenance of flowering in tomato , 2004, Planta.

[12]  Koji Goto,et al.  TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis Homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, Counteracts the Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the Vascular Tissues of Leaves to Regulate Flowering Time Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.016 , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[13]  M. Yano,et al.  Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice , 2003, Nature.

[14]  S. Prat,et al.  Control of photoperiod-regulated tuberization in potato by the Arabidopsis flowering-time gene CONSTANS , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  N. Adir,et al.  Tomato SP-Interacting Proteins Define a Conserved Signaling System That Regulates Shoot Architecture and Flowering Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.010293. , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[16]  Z. Schwarz‐Sommer,et al.  Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. , 2000, Science.

[17]  D. Weigel,et al.  Integration of floral inductive signals in Arabidopsis , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Y. Kobayashi,et al.  A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. , 1999, Science.

[19]  J. Chory,et al.  Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. , 1999, Science.

[20]  H. Tsukaya,et al.  Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[21]  M. Ganal,et al.  The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. , 1998, Development.

[22]  M Koornneef,et al.  Genetic interactions among late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis. , 1998, Genetics.

[23]  F. Madueño,et al.  Different roles of flowering-time genes in the activation of floral initiation genes in Arabidopsis. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[24]  E. Coen,et al.  Inflorescence Commitment and Architecture in Arabidopsis , 1997, Science.

[25]  J. Zeevaart Physiology of Flower Formation , 1976 .

[26]  Daphne Vince-Prue,et al.  Photoperiodism in Plants , 1975 .

[27]  T. Steeves,et al.  Patterns in plant development: Subject index , 1972 .

[28]  A. Calvert Effect of the Early Environment on the Development of Flowering in Tomato II. Light and Temperature Interactions , 1959 .

[29]  H. Allard Gigantism in Nicotiana tabacum and Its Alternative Inheritance , 1919, The American Naturalist.