IMM-LMMSE filtering algorithm for ballistic target tracking with unknown ballistic coefficient

For ballistic target tracking using radar measurements in the polar or spherical coordinates, various nonlinear filters have been studied. Previous work often assumes that the ballistic coefficient of a missile target is known to the filter, which is unrealistic in practice. In this paper, we study the ballistic target tracking problem with unknown ballistic coefficient. We propose a general scheme to handle nonlinear systems with a nuisance parameter. The interacting multiple model (IMM) algorithm is employed and for each model the linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) filter is used. Although we assume that the nuisance parameter is random and time invariant, our approach can be extended to time varying case. A useful property of the model transition probability matrix (TPM) is studied which provides a viable way to tune the model probability. In simulation studies, we illustrate the design of the TPM and compare the proposed method with another two IMM-based algorithms where the extended Kalman filter (EKF) and the unscented filter (UF) are used for each model, respectively. We conclude that the IMM-LMMSE filter is preferred for the problem being studied.

[1]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  Comparison of several ballistic target tracking filters , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[2]  X. Rong Li,et al.  General model-set design methods for multiple-model approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  The interacting multiple model algorithm for systems with Markovian switching coefficients , 1988 .

[4]  X. R. Li,et al.  Optimal Linear Estimation Fusion — Part IV : Optimality and Efficiency of Distributed Fusion , 2001 .

[5]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Numerically robust implementation of multiple-model algorithms , 1999, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[6]  Zhanlue Zhao,et al.  The behavior of model probability in multiple model algorithms , 2005, 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[7]  Zhanlue Zhao,et al.  Probabilistic model distortion measure and its application to model-set design of multiple model approach , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[8]  LI X.RONG,et al.  Best linear unbiased filtering with nonlinear measurements for target tracking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  P. J. Costa Adaptive model architecture and extended Kalman-Bucy filters , 1994 .

[10]  A. Farina,et al.  Tracking a ballistic target: comparison of several nonlinear filters , 2002 .

[11]  Marcelo G. S. Bruno,et al.  A density assisted particle filter algorithm for target tracking with unknown ballistic coefficient , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[12]  H.A.P. Blom,et al.  Particle filtering for stochastic hybrid systems , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[13]  V. Jilkov,et al.  Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part V. Multiple-model methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  X. Rong Li,et al.  Measuring Estimator's Credibility: Noncredibility Index , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[15]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[16]  Vesselin P. Jilkov,et al.  A survey of maneuvering target tracking: approximation techniques for nonlinear filtering , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  X. Rong Li,et al.  Recursibility and optimal linear estimation and filtering , 2004, CDC.

[18]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..