A look at spatial abilities in undergraduate women science majors

Contemporary investigations indicate that men generally perform significantly better in tasks involving visuo-spatial awareness than do women. Researchers have attempted to explain this difference through several hypotheses but as yet the reason for the dimorphism has not been established. Further, contemporary studies have indicated that enhancement of mental image formation and manipulation is possible when students are subjected to carefully designed spatial interventions. Present research was conducted to see if women in the sciences were as spatial perceptively accurate as their male counterparts. The researcher also was interested to find if the women that received the intervention excercises improved in their visuo-spatial awareness as rapidly as their male counterparts. The study was conducted on science majors at a suburban two year college. The population was randomly divided into groups (experimental, placebo, and control) each containing approximately the same number of men and women. All groups were given a battery of spatial perception tests (Ekstrom et al, 1976) at the onset of the winter semester and a second version of the battery at the conclusion of the semester. An analysis of variance followed by Scheffe contrasts were run on the results. The statistics revealed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the nonexperimental groups on the tests. When the differences between the mean scores for the women in the experimental group were statistically compared to those of the men in the experimental group the women were improving at a more rapid rate. Many women have the capacity to develop visuo-spatial aptitude and although they may start out behind men in spatial ability, they learn quickly and often catch up to the men's level when given meaningful visuo-spatial interventions.

[1]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? , 1980, Science.

[2]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[3]  Anne C. Petersen,et al.  Physical androgyny and cognitive functioning in adolescence. , 1976 .

[4]  J. Mcglone,et al.  Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Jane M. Connor,et al.  Sex Differences in Children's Response to Training on a Visual-Spatial Test. , 1977 .

[6]  Michael C. Mitchelmor Three-dimensional geometrical drawing in three cultures , 1980 .

[7]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[8]  T. Lord Biology and the Right Brain , 1985 .

[9]  Lynn S. Liben,et al.  Sex Differences in Performance on Piagetian Spatial Tasks: Differences in Competence or Performance?. , 1980 .

[10]  G B Kolata,et al.  Math and sex: are girls born with less ability? , 1980, Science.

[11]  G. Pallrand,et al.  Spatial Ability and Achievement in Introductory Physics. , 1984 .

[12]  T. Lord Enhancing the visuo‐spatial aptitude of students , 1985 .

[13]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  The myth of equality in science classrooms , 1983 .

[14]  John Zachary Young,et al.  Programs of the brain , 1978 .

[15]  P. Caplan,et al.  Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. , 1985, The American psychologist.

[16]  M. V. Leeuwen A Cross-Cultural Examination of Psychological Differentiation in Males and Females , 1978 .